· Private foundation
Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $220k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DINING FOR DIABETES - COX MONETT HOSP | $100,000 |
| CARE TO LEARN | $70,000 |
| CAMP BARNABAS | $50,000 |
| FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC | $25,000 |
| BARRY-LAWRENCE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $25,000 |
| DEVON'S BEAT | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCOXHEALTH FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2023 · $454k · revenue +42%
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC6× · 2018–2023 · $294k · revenue +75%
- TFTHE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC2× · 2024–2025 · $75k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWESTgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +36%
- TTTHE TOOTH TRUCK INCone grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
- STSHOES THAT FITgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +124%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide lodging to families of hospitalized children at an affordable cost, or no cost, based on need through operation of the ronald mcdonald house.
At ronald mcdonald house, we provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
To provide a supportive home-away-from-home for families of children receiving medical care at riley children's health and other area hospitals.
Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.
To provide lodging and support services to families with critically ill or injured children.
To provide improved access to primary care, behavioral healthcare and oral health care services for medically underserved individuals in central missouri regardless of their ability to pay. our vision is embracing people and inspiring…
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Illinois (RMHCCI) provides programs to support the well-being of children and provides a home away from home for families with children receiving medical care.
The organization provides lodging and supportive services to families of serious ill or injured children who require medical care and treatment in columbia, mo area medical centers.
Ronald mcdonald house charities columbia, sc creates, funds and supports programs that directly improve the health and well-being of children and their families.
Cincinnati children's hospital medical center will be the leader in improving child health. cincinnati children's will provide child health and transform delivery of care through fully integrated, globally recognized research, education,…
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values are the organizational…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of the Ozarks Inc and the most unlike its peers is Devons Beat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BARNABAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COXHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds COX-MONETT HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds BARRY-LAWRENCE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds Care to Learn ↗
- Who funds DEVONS BEAT ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds THE TOOTH TRUCK INC ↗
- Who funds SHOES THAT FIT ↗
- Who funds CRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arvest Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · Missouri Sports Hall of Fame · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ?
Find your warmest path to Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.