Loading…
· Private foundation
FULDNER FAMILY FDN-PIA EQU
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$290k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
2
Communities
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Religion$560kPhilanthropy$454kHealth$444kRecreation & Sports$60kHousing & Shelter$50kHuman Services$20kOther$331k
02FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $230k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- COX MONETT HOSPITAL INC$110,000
- CAMP BARNABAS$70,000
- FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC$50,000
- TOOTH TRUCK INC$40,000
- DEVON'S BEAT$20,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 6 repeat orgs$341k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
3
Total granted
$1.6M
$71k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+81%
+149%
Still filing today
83%
33%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $270k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthReligionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCOXHEALTH FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2023 · $454k · revenue +42%
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS6× · 2018–2023 · $294k · revenue +81%
- BLBARRY LAWRENCE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER2× · 2022–2023 · $170k · revenue +206%
Funded once
- CCCHILDREN'S CENTERone grant, 2019 · $50k
- STSHOES THAT FITgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +149%
- IHISABEL'S HOUSEone grant, 2018 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central Texas Inc
To provide lodging and support services to families with critically ill or injured children.
Health
2
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities
Ronald mcdonald house charities of northeast kansas keeps families close by providing a comfortable and conveniently located home for parents and loved ones who have children receiving medical care at area hospitals.
Health
3
Cox Barton County Hospital
The organization provides quality health care, education and research in order to improve the health of the communities it serves.
Health
4
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of
The organization provides lodging and supportive services to families of serious ill or injured children who require medical care and treatment in columbia, mo area medical centers.
Health
5
Coxhealth
Supporting organization for lester e cox medical centers, cox monett hospital, cox barton county hospital, and skaggs community hospital association.
Health
6
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities
Through support of ronald mcdonald houses in north carolina, rmhc of nc keeps families close to their sick or injured children while they receive treatment at hospitals in our state. rmhc of nc also provides grants to nc charities that…
—
7
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of
To provide a supportive home-away-from-home for families of children receiving medical care at riley children's health and other area hospitals.
—
8
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of
The mission of ronald mcdonald house charities of indiana - michiana is to provide a "home-away-from-home" for families of seriously ill children.
—
9
Ronald Mcdonald House
Ronald mcdonald house charities (rmhc) columbia, sc provides guest families with all the comforts of home, so they are able to focus on what matters the most, the health of their child. keeping families close to each other and the care…
Human Services
10
The Children's Mercy Hospital
Excellence in healthcare for children
Health
11
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of South
To create, find and support programs that direclty improve the health of children.
Health
12
Ronald McDonald House Charities of
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Illinois (RMHCCI) provides a supportive place for families to stay while their child is receiving medical care, and supports programs that directly improve the health and well-being of children.…
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of the and the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Council for Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Religion$560,024Philanthropy$454,115Health$444,495Other$331,000Recreation & Sports$60,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Human Services$20,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BARNABAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COXHEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS ↗
- Who funds BARRY LAWRENCE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds COX MONETT HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Lincoln Council for Community Betterment ↗
- Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds TOOTH TRUCK INC ↗
- Who funds SHOES THAT FIT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Arvest Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation FULDNER FAMILY FDN-PIA EQU funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Lincoln Council for Community Betterment.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.4× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 352241981 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Lincoln Council for Community Betterment, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 91% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ?
Find your warmest path to Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines