Skip to content

· Public charity

Friendship Circle International Inc

Friendship circle international provides support for more than 80 regional organizations around the world.

$258k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$597kReligion$275kYouth Development$17kInternational$6k
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $192,792, the rows itemized in this filing. The $257,565 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $64,773 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $92k
$12,002
Median grant
5
States reached
$37k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF BROOKLYN$92,365
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF UPPER EAST SIDE$45,604
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE MARYLAND$13,040
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE FIVE TOWNS$12,002
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF TOLEDO$11,022
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PHILADELPHIA$7,359
LUBAVITCH YESHIVA$6,000
CHABAD UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$5,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Friendship Circle Central Jersey: $8k → 6%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE CENTRAL JERSEY: $7k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $40k on the FY2022 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$40k · 100% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT FOR SERVICES

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$790k · 10 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +118% since the first grant, against +77% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$790k
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+118%
+77%

Still filing today

40%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22
Youth DevelopmentReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF BROOKLYN INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $318k · revenue +156%
  • FC
    FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE
    4× · 2017–2021 · $41k · revenue +118%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PHILADELPHIA REGION INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $38k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • BC
    Broward CHAI Center Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +13%
  • THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue +346%
  • FC
    Friendship Circle of Connecticut Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Friendship Circle of Washington

The Friendship Circle extends respite, inclusion,support and friendship to families, children and teens with special needs and involves them in a full range of social, educational & life skills experiences. this unique formula introduces…

Education
2
Bay Area Friendship Circle

To provide assistance and support to the families of children with special needs.

Human Services
3
Circle of Friends for Kids
International
4
Friendship Circle of Va

To create an inclusive community by facilitating friendships and social opportunities for people with and without disabilities to connect through meaningful social experiences at home and throughout the community.

Health
5
Friendship Circle of Passaic County

To provide friends and companions for children with special needs and to teach compassion and inclusion to main stream teens in a general educational environment.

Human Services
6
Friendship Circle of Miami Beach and North Dade Inc

Friendship Circle of Miami Beach and North Dade, Inc. provides assistance and support to the families of children with disabilities. The Organization serves more than 250 families and is served by hundreds of volunteers accross Miami-Dade…

Youth Development
7
Friends Circle Organization of Yeshiva Haramban U Beit Yossef Inc

To further jewish education and help all jews in need

—
8
Jews of the Circle Inc
Religion
9
Friendship Circle of North Broward and South Palm Beach Inc

The Friendship Circle provides assistance and support to the families of children with special needs.

Human Services
10
Friendship Circle Sd Inc

to enrich the lives of children, teens and adults with special needs through social and recreational experiences and to inspire volunteers to participate in building a stronger and more inclusive community.

Human Services
11
Friendship Circle Delaware Valley North Inc

The Friendship Circle provides assistance and support to the families of children with special needs as well as to individuals and families struggling with addiction, isolation, and other crises. It provides grants for organizations to…

Human Services
12
Friendship Circle International Inc

Friendship circle international provides support for more than 80 regional organizations around the world. the organization supports entities whose mission it is to bring happiness and companionship to children and young adults with…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Friendship Circle Philadelphia Region Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Lubavitch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD-LUBAVITCH OF THE UPPER EAST SIDE INC: $148,323 · OtherCHABAD-LUBAVITCH OF THE UPPER EAST SIDE INCCHABAD-LUBAVITCH OF MARYLAND INC: $98,763 · OtherCHABAD-LUBAVITCH OF MARYLAND INCCHABAD OF GREAT NECK INC: $64,423 · OtherCHABAD OF GREAT NECK INCTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PHILADELPHIA REGION INC: $37,730 · OtherTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PHILADELPHIA REGION INCCHABAD OF NEWTON INC: $30,846 · OtherCHABAD OF NEWTON INCFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE FIVE TOWNS: $23,024 · OtherCHABAD HOUSE OF CONN INC: $19,165 · Other+6 more: $38,218 · Other+6 moreFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF BROOKLYN INC: $318,445 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF BROOKLYN INCFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $40,668 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDSHIP CIRCLETHE HOUSTON FRIENDSHIP AND WELLNESS CIRCLE INC: $16,994 · Youth DevelopmentBroward CHAI Center Inc: $15,782 · ReligionFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC: $5,029 · ReligionTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $8,551 · EducationFriendship Circle of Connecticut Inc: $8,196 · EducationTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $14,825 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $5,807 · International
Other$460,492Youth Development$376,107Religion$20,811Education$16,747Human Services$14,825International$5,807

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF BROOKLYN INC: $318,445 over 5y, 15% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $40,668 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PHILADELPHIA REGION INC: $37,730 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetTHE HOUSTON FRIENDSHIP AND WELLNESS CIRCLE INC: $16,994 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetBroward CHAI Center Inc: $15,782 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $14,825 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $8,551 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFriendship Circle of Connecticut Inc: $8,196 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH: $5,807 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC: $5,029 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF BROOKLYN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE PHILADELPHIA REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSTON FRIENDSHIP AND WELLNESS CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Broward CHAI Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Circle of Connecticut Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF CLEVELAND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY22.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Nash Charity Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ojc Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friendship Circle International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friendship Circle International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Friendship Circle International Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Friendship Circle International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Friendship Circle International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph