Skip to content

· Private foundation

Friedland Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7.8M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$882kPhilanthropy$440kArts & Culture$152kAnimals$130kYouth Development$40kEnvironment$18kCivil Rights$13kHealth$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $113k
  • $250k+3 grants · $16M
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAULA FRIEDLAND BOGGUST FOUNDATION$7,848,035
STEINER FAMILY FOUNDATION$7,848,035
COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST$300,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA$113,000
NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION$15,000
WESTSIDE FOUNDATION$10,000
OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS$6,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS$5,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$4,960
RESPECT$1,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$1,000
CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$500
DUCHESNE ACADEMY OF SACRED HEART$250
CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $100k → 13%NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION: $15k → 13%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%NET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION: $8k → 13%NET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION: $8k → 13%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 12%NET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION: $8k → 13%NET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION: $8k → 13%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 12%NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%NET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION: $8k → 13%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 12%WESTSIDE FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%FILM STREAMS: $13k → 12%FILM STREAMS: $13k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%OMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $6k → 12%PAULA FRIEDLAND BOGGUST FOUNDATION: $7.8M → 12%STEINER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7.8M → 12%COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $300k → 12%COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $100k → 12%COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $100k → 12%COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $50k → 12%COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $50k → 12%COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $50k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA: $113k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA: $99k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA: $74k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA: $74k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA: $49k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA: $49k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA: $49k → 12%JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA: $46k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 24 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -36% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
5

Total granted

$1.6M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-36%

Still filing today

54%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 2% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST
    6× · 2017–2025 · $650k · revenue ×23
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +31%
  • NH
    NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • SF
    STEINER FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2025 · $7.8M
  • PF
    PAULA FRIEDLAND BOGGUST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2025 · $7.8M
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.

Environment
2
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
3
The Omaha Institute for Nonprofit Journalism

The omaha institute for nonprofit journalism (oinj) formed in 2022 with a simple mission - help build a sustainable and equitable future for journalism in nebraska's largest city. oinj aims to be both a local journalism lab and incubator,…

—
4
Museum of Nebraska Art

The museum of nebraska art (mona) celebrates the history of nebraska's visual art for diverse audiences. mona collects, preserves, researches, exhibits, and interprets the work of artists who were born, lived, trained, or worked in…

Arts & Culture
5
Nebraska State Historical Society Foundation

The nebraska state historical society foundation's mission is to support the preservation, interpretation and appreciation of nebraska history.

Arts & Culture
6
Stand for Schools

Stand for schools supports nebraska's public schools, working to advance policies that make them stronger while opposing policies that would weaken them.

Education
7
Nebraska Community Foundation

The nebraska community foundation unleashes abundant local assets, inspires charitable giving, and connects ambitious people to build stronger communities and a greater nebraska.

Philanthropy
8
Omaha Parks Foundation

The mission of the omaha parks foundation is to improve, promote, preserve, protect, and support omaha's parks and recreation system. we engage in initiatives that make our parks system more accessible, inclusive, and beneficial to all…

Environment
9
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
10
Share Omaha

Our mission is to help nonprofits fulfill theirs.

Philanthropy
11
Unf Charitable Gift Fund

The unf charitable gift fund was established to enable donors to make charitable donations to multiple organizations, including the university of nebraska.

Philanthropy
12
Nebraska Realtors Association

Unite realtor boards to be able to influence matters affecting real estate state wide, unify laws and regulations and promote education among members

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Nebraska Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Nebraska Jewish Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STEINER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $7,848,035 · OtherSTEINER FAMILY FOUNDATIONPAULA FRIEDLAND BOGGUST FOUNDATION: $7,848,035 · OtherPAULA FRIEDLAND BOGGUST FOUNDATION+18 more: $242,360 · OtherCOMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $650,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $500,000 · Education+1 more: $4,000 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC: $553,250 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $130,000 · AnimalsNEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $8,000 · Arts & CultureRESPECT2: $8,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $10,000 · EnvironmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$15,938,430Education$1,154,000Philanthropy$553,250Animals$130,000Arts & Culture$53,500Environment$10,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $650,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC: $553,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $130,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MIDLANDS: $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION: $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRESPECT2: $8,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $4,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF OMAHA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds NET FOUNDATION FOR TELEVISION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds RESPECT2 ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE OMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · The Fred and Eve Simon Charitable Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Phillip and Terri Schrager Foundation · Jewish Federation of Omaha Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation · Martha and David Slosburg Family Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Friedland Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Friedland Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Friedland Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Friedland Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Friedland Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph