Skip to content

· Public charity

Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$199k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$3.5MEnvironment$148kRecreation & Sports$32kCommunity Improvement$25kHuman Services$20k
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 35 grants below total $1,203,133, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,530,167 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $327,034 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $507k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $646k
$20,875
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLEITEZ PRODUCE$198,660
MILLER FARMS PRODUCE (B&T PRODUCE)$190,657
ARCADIA CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE FOOD & AGRICULTURE$73,562
ASHTON FARMS$66,769
BARAJAS PRODUCE$65,610
78 ACRES$50,924
OCHOA PRODUCE$39,327
KNOPP FARMS ON THE SHORE$37,438
MICKLEY'S ORCHARD AND FARM MARKET$34,229
WEAVER BROTHERS$34,125
MCCLEAF'S ORCHARD$33,133
BEN'S PRODUCE$31,972
KINGS PRODUCE$27,886
QUAKER VALLEY ORCHARDS$27,150
SMADC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CORNERSTONES: $29k → 6%CORNERSTONES INC: $20k → 6%CORNERSTONES: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 32 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
11

Total granted

$3.5M
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+7%

Still filing today

19%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementFood & NutritionEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ARCADIA FOOD INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $312k · revenue +83%
  • TC
    TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND
    3× · 2022–2024 · $241k · revenue +104%
  • FO
    Friends of the National Arboretum
    3× · 2017–2019 · $169k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • NF
    Nature Forward
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +7%
  • HF
    HERCULES FENCE
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • LC
    LICKING CREEK BEND FARM
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
2
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
3
Crossroads Community Food Network Inc

Improving community health through local food access.

Food & Nutrition
4
Farmville Community Garden
Food & Nutrition
5
Engaged Community Offshoots

Our mission is to serve as a prototype for sustainable_local urban farming. we grow great food, farms,and farmers inside the capital beltway in prince georges county maryland.

Education
6
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
7
Stone Barns Restoration Corp Dba Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri

Stone barns center is a nonprofit farm, education, and research center with a mission to catalyze an ecological food culture. since 2004, we have been driving innovation in sustainable farming practices and mindful food choices that…

Arts & Culture
8
Bethesda Green Inc

Bethesda green works to locally accelerate the sustainable economy with a focus on innovation, impact, and community. we are an incubator, a connector, and a community partner. we accelerate green business startups into viable companies…

Environment
9
Washington Dc Meals on Wheels Inc

We deliver healthy delicious meals to our home-bound neighbors. With a vision of creating a more interconnected resilient and compassionate community our program supports entire family systems. In 2024 236 volunteers delivered 55,642 meals…

—
10
Harry R Hughes Center for Agro-Ecology

The Center brings together diverse interests from the agricultural, forestry, and environmental communities for the purpose of retaining Maryland's working landscapes and the industries they support while protecting and improving the…

Food & Nutrition
11
Neighborhood Farmers Market Alliance

Neighborhood farmers market alliance's mission is to strengthen and support washington's small farms and farming families by providing effective direct sales sites and broadening access to seattle shoppers.

Community Improvement
12
Local Environmental Agriculture Project Leap

Local environmental agricultural project's (leap) mission is to create an equitable food and farming system which prioritizes health and abundance. we do this by supporting community initiatives, markets, farms, and farmers.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstones Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arcadia Food Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLEITEZ PRODUCE: $572,042 · OtherPLEITEZ PRODUCEB & T PRODUCE (MILLER FARMS): $527,744 · OtherB & T PRODUCE (MILLER FARMS)BARAJAS PRODUCE: $212,996 · OtherBARAJAS PRODUCEMCLEAF'S MARKET: $137,243 · Other78 ACRES: $132,448 · OtherASHTON FARMS: $120,790 · OtherOCHOA PRODUCE: $101,917 · Other+36 more: $1,064,416 · Other+36 moreARCADIA FOOD INC: $312,368 · Food & NutritionARCADIA FO…Common Good City Farm: $23,475 · Food & NutritionCommon Goo…TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND: $240,839 · Community Improvement+1 more: $5,537 · Community ImprovementFriends of the National Arboretum: $168,823 · EnvironmentNature Forward: $20,000 · EnvironmentCORNERSTONES INC: $68,646 · Human ServicesDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $22,454 · Youth Development
Other$2,869,596Food & Nutrition$335,843Community Improvement$246,376Environment$188,823Human Services$68,646Youth Development$22,454

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARCADIA FOOD INC: $312,368 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND: $240,839 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetFriends of the National Arboretum: $168,823 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCORNERSTONES INC: $68,646 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOODWORKS: $40,746 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCommon Good City Farm: $23,475 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $22,454 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNature Forward: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC: $5,537 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRITEPATHS INC: $5,009 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARCADIA FOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the National Arboretum ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOODWORKS ↗
  • Who funds Common Good City Farm ↗
  • Who funds DREAMING OUT LOUD INC ↗
  • Who funds Nature Forward ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC15.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Patagoniaorg · Impactassetsinc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freshfarm Markets funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freshfarm Markets. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Nature Forward: 32% of income from government
  • Tri-County Council for Southern Maryland: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Freshfarm Markets’ filings →

More from the funding graph