Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$199k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$3.5MEnvironment$148kRecreation & Sports$32kCommunity Improvement$25kHuman Services$20k
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 35 grants below total $1,203,133 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,530,167 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $327,034 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $507k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $646k
$20,875
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLEITEZ PRODUCE$198,660
MILLER FARMS PRODUCE (B&T PRODUCE)$190,657
ARCADIA CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE FOOD & AGRICULTURE$73,562
ASHTON FARMS$66,769
BARAJAS PRODUCE$65,610
78 ACRES$50,924
OCHOA PRODUCE$39,327
KNOPP FARMS ON THE SHORE$37,438
MICKLEY'S ORCHARD AND FARM MARKET$34,229
WEAVER BROTHERS$34,125
MCCLEAF'S ORCHARD$33,133
BEN'S PRODUCE$31,972
KINGS PRODUCE$27,886
QUAKER VALLEY ORCHARDS$27,150
SMADC$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CORNERSTONES: $29k → 6%CORNERSTONES INC: $20k → 6%CORNERSTONES: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 32 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
11

Total granted

$3.5M
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+7%

Still filing today

19%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementFood & NutritionEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ARCADIA FOOD INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $312k · revenue +83%
  • TC
    TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND
    3× · 2022–2024 · $241k · revenue +104%
  • FO
    Friends of the National Arboretum
    3× · 2017–2019 · $169k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • NF
    Nature Forward
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +7%
  • HF
    HERCULES FENCE
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • LC
    LICKING CREEK BEND FARM
    one grant, 2022 · $14k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
2
Community Groundworks Inc

Community groundworks connects individuals to urban agricultural and natural lands within a diverse learning community. we grow wholesome and organic food for local tables, steward urban natural areas, inspire healthful eating, and offer…

3
Community Food Connections Inc

Support small farms and other businesses. Bring sustainable healthy products to the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
Community Farmers Markets Inc

To develop a local food infrastructure for long term sustainability and meaningful community impact and grow a diverse local food culture by maintaining an authentic space for all people to share community, fair food, and healthy…

Food & Nutrition
5
Crossroads Community Food Network Inc

Improving community health through local food access.

Food & Nutrition
6
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
7
Capital Roots Inc

Capital roots, inc. is a not for profit organization that nourishes healthy communities by providing access to fresh food and green spaces for all. it is our beleif that organic gardening and urban revitilization activites promote self…

Environment
8
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
9
Fresh Food Connect

To grow a more local and resilient food system by connecting gardeners with their communities

Food & Nutrition
10
Montgomery County Food Council Inc

Mcfc builds an equitable, resilient and sustainable local food system through collaboration, transformation, and cultivation.mcfc envisions a vibrant and equitable food system that is healthy for our community, economy, and environment.

Food & Nutrition
11
Outgrowing Hunger

We nurture connections between people,nature,and food by ensuring access to garden space and farmland, and providing education and mentoring on regenerative and sustainable agricultural practices.

Food & Nutrition
12
Neighborhood Farmers Market Alliance

Neighborhood farmers market alliance's mission is to strengthen and support washington's small farms and farming families by providing effective direct sales sites and broadening access to seattle shoppers.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerstones Inc and the most unlike its peers is Arcadia Food Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLEITEZ PRODUCE — $572,042 · OtherPLEITEZ PRODUCEB & T PRODUCE (MILLER FARMS) — $527,744 · OtherB & T PRODUCE (MILLER FARMS)BARAJAS PRODUCE — $212,996 · OtherBARAJAS PRODUCEMCLEAF'S MARKET — $137,243 · Other78 ACRES — $132,448 · OtherASHTON FARMS — $120,790 · OtherOCHOA PRODUCE — $101,917 · Other+36 more — $1,064,416 · Other+36 moreARCADIA FOOD INC — $312,368 · Food & NutritionARCADIA FO…Common Good City Farm — $23,475 · Food & NutritionCommon Goo…TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND — $240,839 · Community Improvement+1 more — $5,537 · Community ImprovementFriends of the National Arboretum — $168,823 · EnvironmentNature Forward — $20,000 · EnvironmentCORNERSTONES INC — $68,646 · Human ServicesDREAMING OUT LOUD INC — $22,454 · Youth Development
Other$2,869,596Food & Nutrition$335,843Community Improvement$246,376Environment$188,823Human Services$68,646Youth Development$22,454

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARCADIA FOOD INC — $312,368 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND — $240,839 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetFriends of the National Arboretum — $168,823 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCORNERSTONES INC — $68,646 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOODWORKS — $40,746 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCommon Good City Farm — $23,475 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC — $22,454 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNature Forward — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBUILDING BRIDGES ACROSS THE RIVER INC — $5,537 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRITEPATHS INC — $5,009 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARCADIA FOOD INC
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY COUNCIL FOR SOUTHERN MARYLAND
  • Who funds Friends of the National Arboretum
  • Who funds CORNERSTONES INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOODWORKS
  • Who funds Common Good City Farm
  • Who funds DREAMING OUT LOUD INC
  • Who funds Nature Forward

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC15.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Patagoniaorg · Impactassetsinc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Freshfarm Markets funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 32%
  • Nature Forward32% of income from government
  • Tri-County Council for Southern Maryland6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph