Skip to content
French American Aid for Children Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

French American Aid for Children Inc

The mission of french american aid for children, inc.

$342k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.1MYouth Development$539kInternational$160kEducation$125kHealth$75kCrime & Legal$19k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $200,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $342,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $142,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$65,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC$75,000
KIPS BAY BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB$65,000
THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $506k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $75k → 9%THE NEW YORK FOUNDLING: $30k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $61k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $60k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $60k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $60k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $55k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $55k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $142k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$142k · 100% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT UNDERPRIVILEGED AND VULNERABLE CHILDREN

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 8 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +103% since the first grant, against +81% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$1.8M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+81%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCrime & LegalEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $695k · revenue +17%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $476k · revenue +103%
  • KB
    Kips Bay Boys & Girls Club
    8× · 2017–2024 · $464k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • RT
    REACT TO FILM INC
    one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue -82% · 74% of their budget
  • NY
    NEW YORK FOUNDLINGgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +81%
  • TC
    THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The New York Center for Children

The new york center for children provides trauma-focused therapy services to victims of child abuse, free of charge, for as long as their healing requires.

Human Services
2
The Child Study Center of New York

To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.

—
3
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
4
Children's Center of New Paltz Inc

Operate and maintain a day care center for children of students, faculty, and staff of the state university of new york at new paltz, and for children of the greater new paltz community.

Human Services
5
Children in Conflict Inc

Vision: a world where no child's life is torn apart by war.children in conflict works tirelessly to restore hope, safety and childhoods to children whose lives are affected by war.

Human Services
6
Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

—
7
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
New York Center for Child Development

To provide educational and therapeutic services for children from three to five years of age with significant social emotional challenges and/or developmental delays designed to promote their optimal development.

Education
9
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
10
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
11
Partnership With Children Inc

Partnership with children's mission is to strengthen the emotional, social, and cognitive skills of children in new york city so they can succeed in school, society, and life.

—
12
International Preschools

To operation preschool education programs in the New York City metropolitan area.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Inadcure Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $695,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INCTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $475,950 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC+1 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesKips Bay Boys & Girls Club: $464,000 · Youth DevelopmentKips Bay Boys & Girls ClubREACT TO FILM INC: $75,000 · OtherREACT TO F…ELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER: $67,500 · OtherELIZABETH …THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT: $30,000 · OtherTHE CHILDR…THE BOOKS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherTHE BOOKS …THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $64,000 · EducationGIRLS WRITE NOW INC: $10,500 · EducationAlbertine Foundation: $35,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC: $18,500 · Crime & LegalINADCURE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Health
Human Services$1,200,950Youth Development$464,000Other$192,500Education$74,500Arts & Culture$35,000Crime & Legal$18,500Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $695,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $475,950 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKips Bay Boys & Girls Club: $464,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetREACT TO FILM INC: $75,000 over 1y, 74% of budgetELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER: $67,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $64,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlbertine Foundation: $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDLING: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT: $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE BOOKS FOR KIDS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDREN OF PROMISE NYC: $18,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS WRITE NOW INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINADCURE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC11× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization French American Aid for Children Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from French American Aid for Children Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on French American Aid for Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home