Skip to content

· Private foundation

Freeman E Fairfield Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$122k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$186kFood & Nutrition$147kInternational$127kHuman Services$61kArts & Culture$43kHousing & Shelter$34kEnvironment$15kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RM Plyes Boys Camp$20,000
Meals on Wheels of Long Beach$20,000
Downtown Associated Youth Svcs$15,000
Pathways$10,000
Boys Girls Club of Long Beach$10,000
Caterina's Club$5,000
Salvation Army$5,000
Assistance Leage of Long Beach$5,000
Century Villages of Cabrillo$5,000
Ronald McDonald House$5,000
Food Bank of Southern CA$5,000
YMCA of Greater Long Beach$5,000
Conservation Corps of Long Beach$5,000
Young Horizons Child Development Ce$3,000
Long Beach Blast$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Caterina's Club: $5k → 10%Young Horizons Child Development Ce: $3k → 14%Young Horizons Child Development Ce: $2k → 14%Life Steps Foundation: $2k → 14%YOUNG HORIZONS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$593k · 19 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$593k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
-1%

Still filing today

42%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentEducationInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Best Buddies International Inc
    5× · 2017–2023 · $127k · revenue +81%
  • RP
    RM PYLES BOYS CAMP
    5× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +72%
  • FF
    FOOD FINDERS INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE EDWIN DOROTHY BAKER FD
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUBS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • LA
    LB AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SC
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youths Working for Change

Expand opportunities available to underresourced individuals in the city of long beach

Youth Development
2
Long Beach Community Improvement League

To provide high quality and affordable child care, nutrition and other social services to low-income families.

—
3
Leadership Long Beach

We are a catalyst that informs, activates, and connects community leaders to more meaningfully serve Long Beach.

—
4
Assistance League of Laguna Beach

Assistance League of Laguna Beach volunteers are focused on transforming lives and strengthening our community.

Human Services
5
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Los Angeles

To help at-promise children and youth in los angeles reach their fullest potential through professionally supported, one-to-one mentoring relationships that strengthen their social, emotional, cognitive and behavioral competencies. youth…

Youth Development
6
Big Brothersbig Sisters Agency of Santa Cruz County Inc

Create and support mentoring matches that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
7
Long Beach Call

To ensure all long beach secondary students, grades 6-12, have access to inspiring work-based learning opportunities in growing and emerging career sectors, complementing what they learn in class.

—
8
Family Promise of Los Angeles

Family promise of the south bay assists families experiencing housing insecurity with short-term shelter, case management, and navigation with the goal of creating a sustainable solution for their family.

Human Services
9
Long Beach Area Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber is the platform for business to provide leadership, education and advocacy so that the Long Beach area thrives in the 21st century.

—
10
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central California

Our mission is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

—
11
Los Angeles Team Mentoring Inc

Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.

Youth Development
12
Catholic Big Brothers Big Sisters Inc

Catholic Big Brothers Big Sisters pairs youth in-need and volunteers of all faiths and backgrounds in one-to-one professionally suported mentoring relationships to help them academically and in life.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Long Beach; the most unlike its peers is Life Steps Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RM PYLES BOYS CAMP: $90,000 · OtherRM PYLES BOYS CAMPMEALS ON WHEELS: $50,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSPATHWAYS: $41,000 · OtherPATHWAYSDowntown Associated Youth Svcs: $30,000 · OtherDowntown Associated Youth SvcsTHE EDWIN & DOROTHY BAKER FD: $28,000 · OtherTHE EDWIN & DOROTHY BAKER FDBoys Girls Club of Long Beach: $20,000 · OtherFAIRFIELD FAMILY YMCA: $16,000 · OtherTHE EDWIN DOROTHY BAKER FD: $15,000 · OtherYMCA of Greater Long Beach: $15,000 · OtherLONG BEACH RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $14,000 · Other+9 more: $56,000 · Other+9 moreBest Buddies International Inc: $127,000 · InternationalBest Buddies Internat…FOOD FINDERS INC: $52,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FINDERS IN…Meals on Wheels of Long Beach Inc: $40,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $19,000 · Youth DevelopmentCONSERVATION CORPS OF LONG BEACH: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG HORIZONS: $6,000 · Human ServicesCATERINAS CLUB: $5,000 · Human ServicesLIFE STEPS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesLong Beach BLAST Better Learning for All Students Today: $8,000 · EducationLONG BEACH DAY NURSERY: $2,000 · EducationCENTURY VILLAGES AT CABRILLO INC: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$375,000International$127,000Food & Nutrition$92,000Youth Development$34,000Human Services$13,000Education$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $127,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRM PYLES BOYS CAMP: $90,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetFOOD FINDERS INC: $52,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Long Beach Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $19,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONSERVATION CORPS OF LONG BEACH: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLong Beach BLAST Better Learning for All Students Today: $8,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG HORIZONS: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCATERINAS CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTURY VILLAGES AT CABRILLO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAssistance League of Long Beach: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE STEPS FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPower 4 Youth Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLONG BEACH DAY NURSERY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds RM PYLES BOYS CAMP ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Long Beach Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION CORPS OF LONG BEACH ↗
  • Who funds Long Beach BLAST Better Learning for All Students Today ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG HORIZONS ↗
  • Who funds CATERINAS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CENTURY VILLAGES AT CABRILLO INC ↗
  • Who funds Assistance League of Long Beach ↗
  • Who funds LIFE STEPS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Power 4 Youth Inc ↗
  • Who funds LONG BEACH DAY NURSERY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Earl B & Loraine H Miller FoundationCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation · The Josephine S Gumbiner Foundation · Bess J Hodges Foundation · The Rudolph J & Daphne a Munzer Foundation · Long Beach Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Temple Family Charitable Foundation · Porter John W Tuw

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freeman E Fairfield Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freeman E Fairfield Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Freeman E Fairfield’s filings →

More from the funding graph