Skip to content
Freedom Church Alliance at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Freedom Church Alliance

Uniting and equipping the Church to fight human trafficking.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$468kCrime & Legal$96kHealth$35kArts & Culture$33kInternational$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $124,762, the rows itemized in this filing. The $130,162 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,400 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$347k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Joseph Project$25,000
Elijah Rising$21,230
Refuge for Women$20,000
Street Grace$20,000
Rescue America$18,532
Unbound Now$10,000
Love People Not Pixels Inc$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $371k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Elijah Rising: $26k → 16%Elijah Rising: $21k → 16%Elijah Rising: $13k → 16%Elijah Rising: $10k → 16%Elijah Rising: $10k → 16%Elijah Rising: $10k → 16%Street Grace: $100k → 16%Street Grace: $20k → 16%Street Grace: $20k → 16%Street Grace: $15k → 16%Street Grace: $15k → 16%Street Grace: $10k → 16%Street Grace: $10k → 16%The Landing: $13k → 16%The Landing: $16k → 16%The Landing: $16k → 16%The Landing: $15k → 16%Elevate 61 International: $12k → 16%Elevate 61 International: $10k → 16%Elevate 61 International: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$817k · 12 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$817k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+36%

Still filing today

83%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    Street Grace Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $190k · revenue +104%
  • SI
    SOTERIA INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
    6× · 2019–2025 · $97k · revenue +66%
  • RF
    REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $94k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • RU
    RESCUE US INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +110%
  • CA
    Childproof America
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -41%
  • R
    REDIMIRgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Untrafficked Inc
Human Services
2
Restoration House of Greater Kansas City

ReHope empowers and elevates survivors of human trafficking and sexual exploitation through its faith-based, trauma-informed residence and recovery programs.

Housing & Shelter
3
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
4
STRIVE2FREE

Raised significant funds for housing of human trafficking victims andraised awareness of the problem of human trafficking in the process.

Human Services
5
Rescue Her Inc

Rescue Her exists to empower survivors of sex trafficking to live in freedom through raising awareness, crisis response and service, and long-term advocacy programs.

Philanthropy
6
Life 107 Ministries Inc

To elimate sex trafficking and empower survivors to successful recovery. We work in the three channels of protection, prevention, outreach, and restoration.

Health
7
Eden Ministry

Eden Ministry seeks to advocate for trafficked victims in Asia to reach rescue and restore them from exploitation

Religion
8
Mukti International

Mukti is a Sanskrit word that means "freedom from oppression and exploitation". Our goal is to see women and children find pathways to freedom. We partner with organizations around Asia that are on the frontlines helping to rescue and…

Crime & Legal
9
Recollectiv Inc

Prevent Human Trafficking Through Legal Advocacy

Human Services
10
Healing and Resilience After Trauma

Support victims of human trafficking

Human Services
11
Breaking Chains

TO fight for the freedom of innocent children who have been caught in the chains of prostitution, sex trafficking and sexual abuse.

Human Services
12
Set Free Refuge Inc

Set free refuge, inc. is a safe place for sexually exploited and human- trafficked women to break free from the mental and physical bounds of the sex industry.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soteria Innovative Solutions; the most unlike its peers is Unbound. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Street Grace Inc: $190,000 · Human ServicesStreet Grace IncSOTERIA INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS: $97,282 · Human ServicesSOTERIA INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONSElijah Rising: $89,480 · Human ServicesElijah RisingSojourn Landing DBA The Landing: $59,192 · Human ServicesSojourn Landing DBA The LandingELEVATE 61 INTERNATIONAL: $32,000 · Human ServicesELEVATE 61 INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $67,200 · OtherIndividual gr…UNBOUND: $32,500 · OtherUNBOUNDREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC: $93,500 · Housing & ShelterREFUGE FOR W…THE JOSEPH PROJECT INC: $50,000 · Crime & LegalRESCUE US INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalLOVE PEOPLE NOT PIXELS INC: $45,000 · HealthHANDS OF JUSTICE: $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentChildproof America: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNBOUND NOW: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentRedeeming Justice Network: $37,500 · Civil RightsREDIMIR: $7,850 · Religion
Human Services$467,954Other$99,700Housing & Shelter$93,500Crime & Legal$60,000Health$45,000Youth Development$43,000Civil Rights$37,500Religion$7,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStreet Grace Inc: $190,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetSOTERIA INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS: $97,282 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetREFUGE FOR WOMEN INC: $93,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetElijah Rising: $89,480 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetSojourn Landing DBA The Landing: $59,192 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE JOSEPH PROJECT INC: $50,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetLOVE PEOPLE NOT PIXELS INC: $45,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetRedeeming Justice Network: $37,500 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetELEVATE 61 INTERNATIONAL: $32,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetHANDS OF JUSTICE: $23,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetRESCUE US INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetChildproof America: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetREDIMIR: $7,850 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Commu…Shell USA Company Fou…Stoller FoundationNatl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Houston Community FoundationTX21.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Stoller Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Freedom Church Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Freedom Church Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Freedom Church Alliance?

    Find your warmest path to Freedom Church Alliance through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Freedom Church Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home