Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fredrick D & Karen G Schaufeld Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$7.7MPhilanthropy$2.9MEducation$2.7MArts & Culture$1.9MHuman Services$990kInternational$552kYouth Development$482kPublic Benefit$342kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $329k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $538k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.9M
$11,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICINE$1,000,000
UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND$517,289
WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION$405,953
TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS (TAPS)$200,000
LEHIGH UNIVERSITY$100,000
CLAUDE MOORE OPPORTUNITIES$100,000
WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$85,000
JAMES LOGAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$53,335
ALL AGES READ TOGETHER (AART)$47,187
FLAMBOYAN FOUNDATION$45,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR LOUDOUN & N FAUQUIER$33,500
LOUDOUN COMMUNITY MEDIA$26,000
CHABAD AT LEHIGH UNIVERSITY$25,000
MIDDLEBURG FILM FESTIVAL$25,000
NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$22,760
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $514k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%THE FENWICK FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%FIGHT FOR CHILDREN: $202k → 14%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $100k → 6%FIGHT FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 14%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $75k → 6%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $75k → 6%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $4k → 6%LOUDOUN ABUSED WOMENS SHELTER: $5k → 4%CORNERSTONES: $1k → 6%MORVEN PARK: $250 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 57 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
44

Total granted

$16M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+28%

Still filing today

63%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $316k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WT
    WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +54%
  • LU
    LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2024 · $525k · revenue +69%
  • JS
    J STREET
    2× · 2017–2018 · $375k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $365k
  • HA
    HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -2%
  • WE
    WINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue -77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
National Veterans Legal Services Program Inc

To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.

—
4
Loudoun Healthcare Foundation

Undertake and assist in the identification, cultivation, encouragement and solicitation of all types of gifts and the management of trust and endowment funds for the benefit of inova loudoun hospital

—
5
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
6
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
7
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
10
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
11
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fight for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Flamboyan Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
82/83
Grantees still filing
61/83
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICINE: $4,000,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS MEDICINEINOVA HEALTH SYSTEMS: $2,922,143 · OtherINOVA HEALTH SYSTEMSUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND: $2,760,897 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLANDWINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION - PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $600,000 · OtherALL AGES READ TOGETHER (AART): $576,810 · Other+80 more: $2,448,643 · Other+80 moreWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $1,495,958 · Arts & CultureWOLF TRAP F…MIDDLEBURG FILM FESTIVAL: $175,000 · Arts & CultureMIDDLEBURG …WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $144,000 · Arts & CultureWHITE HOUSE…+6 more: $83,004 · Arts & CultureLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $525,122 · EducationHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC: $250,000 · EducationWINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · EducationLeonard Education Organization: $55,000 · EducationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM: $47,998 · Education+3 more: $6,100 · EducationTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $300,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $110,000 · HealthDECESARISPROUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $50,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $31,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $26,000 · Health+7 more: $39,100 · HealthCapital Hospice: $253,625 · Human ServicesFIGHT FOR CHILDREN INC: $251,600 · Human Services+4 more: $9,250 · Human ServicesJ STREET: $375,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 · International+2 more: $1,500 · InternationalTHE GOOD SHEPHERD ALLIANCE INC: $400,000 · Religion
Other$13,308,493Arts & Culture$1,897,962Education$1,084,220Health$557,100Human Services$514,475International$401,500Religion$400,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND: $2,760,897 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetWOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $1,495,958 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $525,122 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD SHEPHERD ALLIANCE INC: $400,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetJ STREET: $375,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $300,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCapital Hospice: $253,625 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFIGHT FOR CHILDREN INC: $251,600 over 2y, 40% of budgetHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMIDDLEBURG FILM FESTIVAL: $175,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetWHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $144,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $110,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCLAUDE MOORE OPPORTUNITIES: $100,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLeonard Education Organization: $55,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetDECESARISPROUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $50,500 over 5y, 18% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM: $47,998 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFLAMBOYAN FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHALCYON HOUSE: $34,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetECOAMERICA: $34,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $31,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $30,684 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGlobal Good Fund: $30,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHERN VIRGINIA INC: $28,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWashington International Horse Show: $28,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLOUDOUN COMMUNITY MEDIA: $26,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $26,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEQUINE RESCUE LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetJewish Women International: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOURNEY THROUGH HALLOWED GROUND PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $5,504 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY CHILD FED: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetLOUDOUN CITIZENS FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOUDOUN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER HEALTHWORKS FOR NORTHERN VIRGINIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetN STREET VILLAGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD SHEPHERD ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds J STREET ↗
  • Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds Capital Hospice ↗
  • Who funds FIGHT FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLEBURG FILM FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds WHITE HOUSE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds CLAUDE MOORE OPPORTUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Leonard Education Organization ↗
  • Who funds DECESARISPROUT CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds FLAMBOYAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HALCYON HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ECOAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Loudoun and Northern Fauquier CountiesVA48.9× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Loudoun and Northern Fauquier Counties · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Major Family Foundation · The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · The Claude Moore Charitable Foundation · Van Metre Companies Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Mirza Family Foundation · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fredrick D & Karen G Schaufeld Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fredrick D & Karen G Schaufeld Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Capital Hospice: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fredrick D & Karen G Schaufeld Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fredrick D & Karen G Schaufeld Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fredrick D & Karen G Schaufeld Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph