Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fred R Martin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$334k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

International$125kArts & Culture$119kCivil Rights$85kEnvironment$60kPublic Benefit$40kSocial Science$34kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $269k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$12,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMPIRE FILES INC$50,000
LIBERATION ALLIANCE$30,000
TRI-VALLEY CARES$25,000
HEAL PALESTINE$25,000
PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND$25,000
PARTNERSHIP FOR CIVIL JUSTICE FUND$20,000
CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH$20,000
ALLIANCE FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE$15,000
VETERANS FOR PEACE$15,000
THE LAB SF$12,000
CENTER FOR NEW MUSIC SAN FRANCISCO INC$12,000
THE PEOPLE'S FORUM$10,000
THE CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$10,000
REBEL ARMY RUNS$10,000
FELTON INSTITUTE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PEOPLE'S FORUM: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
NY
OR
OH
NJ
CA
MO
VA
AZ
DC
HI

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Fred R Martin Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Fred R Martin Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$284k · 8 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$284k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+41%

Still filing today

88%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsPublic BenefitEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    EMPIRE FILES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +83%
  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +32%
  • P
    PARTNERSHIPFORCIVILJUSTICEFUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MEDIA FREEDON FOUNDATIONPROJECT CENSORED
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • N'
    N 'AIKNE O MAUI INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • GI
    G I RIGHTS NETWORK
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Policy Forum Inc

Research and education of United Nations activities

International
2
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
3
Center for Contemporary Documentation Inc
Philanthropy
4
Codepink Women for Peace

To end u.s. wars and militarism, support peace and human rights initiatives.

Education
5
Civil Liberties Defense Center

CIVIL LIBERTIES DEFENSE CENTER (CLDC) educates the general public about their rights and privileges under the US Constitution and provides free legal support to climate and social justice activists.

Civil Rights
6
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
7
Climate Rights International

CRI is an international climate and human rights monitoring and advocacy organization dedicated to preventing climate change and human rights abuses.

Environment
8
Rules Foundation

/The Rules is a global network of activists, organizers, designers, coders, researchers, writers and others dedicated to changing the rules that create inequality, climate change, and poverty around the world.

9
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
10
International Forum on Globalization Inc

A unique collaborative of some of the world's leading activists, scholars and thinkers, IFG organizes large public teach-ins and invitational seminars, and produces publications.

11
The Breakthrough Institute

The Breakthrough Institute is a research center that identifies and promotes technological solutions to environmental and human development challenges.

Environment
12
Corporate Accountability Lab

The Organization unleashes the creative potential of the law to protect people and the planet from corporate abuse.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance for Global Justice Corp and the most unlike its peers is Rebel Army Runs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRI-VALLEY CARES — $35,000 · OtherTRI-VALLEY CARESLIBERATION ALLIANCE — $30,000 · OtherLIBERATION ALLIANCETHE LAB SF — $22,000 · OtherTHE LAB SFTHE MEDIA FREEDON FOUNDATIONPROJECT CENSORED — $20,000 · OtherTHE MEDIA FREEDON FOUNDATIONPROJECT CENSOREDN 'AIKNE O MAUI INC — $20,000 · OtherN 'AIKNE O MAUI INCG I RIGHTS NETWORK — $10,000 · OtherClimate Defiance Action — $10,000 · OtherFelton Institute — $10,000 · OtherCENTER ON CONSCIENCE & WAR — $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherREBEL ARMY RUNS INC — $10,000 · OtherCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $10,000 · Other+3 more — $14,000 · Other+3 morePALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND — $50,000 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELI…HEAL PALESTINE INC — $25,000 · InternationalHEAL PALESTINE INCCENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH — $20,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND P…Alliance for Global Justice Corp — $15,000 · InternationalAlliance for Global Justi…Friends of the Congo — $5,000 · InternationalEMPIRE FILES INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureEMPIRE FILES INCCENTER FOR NEW MUSIC SAN FRANCISCO INC — $22,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR NEW MUSIC …PARTNERSHIPFORCIVILJUSTICEFUND — $40,000 · Civil RightsVeterans For Peace Inc — $20,000 · Public BenefitALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION ON TOXICS — $20,000 · EnvironmentPeople's Forum Inc — $10,000 · Human Services
Other$211,000International$115,000Arts & Culture$97,000Civil Rights$40,000Public Benefit$20,000Environment$20,000Human Services$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEMPIRE FILES INC — $75,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIPFORCIVILJUSTICEFUND — $40,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHEAL PALESTINE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAB SF — $22,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCENTER FOR NEW MUSIC SAN FRANCISCO INC — $22,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVeterans For Peace Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION ON TOXICS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPeople's Forum Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREBEL ARMY RUNS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetClimate Defiance Action — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFelton Institute — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER ON CONSCIENCE & WAR — $10,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of the Congo — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOREGON INSTITUTE FOR CREATIVE RESEARCH — $4,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincMD15.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fred R Martin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred R Martin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred R Martin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph