Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred R & Opal S Woosley Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$742k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$483kHuman Services$452kHealth$429kReligion$233kYouth Development$206kArts & Culture$192kPhilanthropy$158kEnvironment$135kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $695k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL BSA$35,000
LITTLE SISTRERS OF THE POOR$30,000
HOME OF THE IONNOCENTS$30,000
GILDA'S CLUB$30,000
VISUALLY IMPAIRED PRESCHOOL INC$25,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$25,000
YEW DELL BOTANICAL GARDENS$25,000
SECOND HOPE MINISTRIES$25,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE$25,000
KIDS CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC THERAPIES$25,000
CREASEY MAHAN NATURE PRESERVE$25,000
CAROLE'S KITCHEN$25,000
NEW LIFE DIRECTIONS MINISTRIES$25,000
CABBAGE PATCH SETTLEMENT HOUSE3$25,000
MERIDETH -DUNN SCHOOL$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $210k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEW LIFE DIRECTIONS MINISTRIES: $25k → 15%NEW LIFE DIRECTIONS MINISTRIES: $25k → 15%SECOND HOPE MINISTRIES: $25k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $25k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $20k → 15%WINGS OF REFUGE: $20k → 15%PAWS WITH PURPOSE: $20k → 15%WINGS OF REFUGE: $15k → 15%CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%SECOND HOPE MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%AWAKE MINISTRIES: $5k → 15%AWAKE MINISTRIES: $5k → 15%THE PRISONER'S HOPE: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 85 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.

85 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

85
27

Total granted

$2.6M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-23%

Still filing today

27%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    Cerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +165%
  • WO
    WINGS OF REFUGE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue +11%
  • NA
    NATIVITY ACADEMY AT SAINT BONIFACE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • L
    LOUISVILLE
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • PW
    PAWS WITH A PURPOSE
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • WS
    WAG S PET THERAPY OF KY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Day Spring Inc

Day spring provides a path forward for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities through services that cultivate hope, belonging, and community.we envision every person being valued and having a path forward regardless of…

Human Services
2
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
3
Cedar Lake Lodge Inc

Our vision is of a community where those with and without disabilities learn to share and enrich each other's lives through meaningful interactions that cultivate mutual respect and unconditional love. our mission is to offer highly…

Health
4
Harbor House of Louisville Inc

To empower individuals with disabilities and their families to lead fulfilled and productive lives. harbor house empowers individuals through employment, education, and community building opportunities.

Civil Rights
5
Hospice of Hope Inc

Hospice of hope is an organization devoted to caring for the physical, psychosocial, emotional and spiritual needs of terminally ill individuals and their families. the organization also provides for an assisted living facility in…

Human Services
6
Lighthouse Christian Home and Services Inc

For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.

Human Services
7
Simon House Inc

The organization's mission is to reduce the extent and consequences of homelessness in franklin and surrounding counties. this is accomplished by providing two low-barrier shelters that accommodate homeless men, women, and children.…

—
8
Central Louisville Community Ministries Inc

Central louisville community ministries provides emergency assistance for rent, utilities and medication. also provide in-kind assistances for food, clothing, personal care items,school supplies and haircut vouchers.

—
9
L'arche Syracuse Inc

L'arche syracuse, inc. is a faith based organization. our mission is to (1) make known the gifts of people with developmental disabilities, revealed through mutually transforming relations, (2) foster an environment in community that…

Human Services
10
Cedar Lake - Monticello Parke Inc

Our vision is of a community where those with and without disabilities learn to share and enrich each other's lives through meaningful interactions that cultivate mutual respect and unconditional love. our mission is to offer highly…

Human Services
11
Independent Living Options Inc

Empowering people with disabilities to live independent lives in the community.

—
12
Goodwill Industries of Kentucky Inc

Goodwill's mission is to help people with disabilities or other disadvantages achieve and maintain employment to gain a better quality of life.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St John Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Carole's Kitchen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
10/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL BSA: $125,000 · OtherLINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL BSA+98 more: $2,185,500 · Other+98 moreNEW LIFE DIRECTIONS MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesWINGS OF REFUGE INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesSecond Hope Ministeries Corporation: $35,000 · Human ServicesPAWS WITH PURPOSE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR OF HOPE INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesCerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc: $50,000 · HealthCURE CF INC: $30,000 · HealthDown Syndrome of Louisville Inc: $10,000 · HealthHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $10,000 · HealthUPSIDE THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $10,000 · HealthCATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · EducationBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $40,000 · EducationNATIVITY ACADEMY AT SAINT BONIFACE: $25,000 · EducationTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyQUEEN'S DAUGHTERS INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyYEW DELL INC: $50,000 · EnvironmentCAROLE'S KITCHEN INC: $45,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,310,500Human Services$210,000Health$110,000Education$110,000Philanthropy$85,000Environment$50,000Food & Nutrition$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYEW DELL INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEW LIFE DIRECTIONS MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAROLE'S KITCHEN INC: $45,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetCATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCREASEY MAHAN NATURE PRESERVE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF REFUGE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetQUEEN'S DAUGHTERS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetSecond Hope Ministeries Corporation: $35,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCURE CF INC: $30,000 over 2y, 76% of budgetNATIVITY ACADEMY AT SAINT BONIFACE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSTORMHAVEN YOUTH RANCH INC: $20,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetWORKWELL INDUSTRIES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST JOHN CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCASA OF THE RIVER REGION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUPSIDE THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $10,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetOPEN DOOR OF HOPE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PRISONERS HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHildegard House Incorporated: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE PROMISE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRADIO EYE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOUISVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds YEW DELL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE DIRECTIONS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Cerebral Palsy KIDS Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds CAROLE'S KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CREASEY MAHAN NATURE PRESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF REFUGE INC ↗
  • Who funds QUEEN'S DAUGHTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Second Hope Ministeries Corporation ↗
  • Who funds CURE CF INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Irvin F & Alice S Etscorn Charitable FoundationKY39× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Irvin F & Alice S Etscorn Charitable Foundation · Cralle Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Wood & Marie Hannah Foundation · V V Cooke Foundation Corporation · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred R & Opal S Woosley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred R & Opal S Woosley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred R & Opal S Woosley Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fred R & Opal S Woosley Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred R & Opal S Woosley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph