Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred and Margaret Grimm Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$368kPhilanthropy$115kYouth Development$107kInternational$46kCrime & Legal$30kAnimals$26kReligion$24kHuman Services$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL BAY SCOUT OF AMERICA FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND$22,500
CHIEF SEATTLE COUNCIL BSA$12,000
LIFE ENRICHMENT OPTIONS$5,000
NAVY LEAGUE SEATTLE COUNCIL$2,500
WORLD VISION$624
MARINE CORP AIR STATION KANEOHE BAY$500
PURRFECT PALS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHARI'S CLOSET: $15k → 11%HOLLY HOUSE FOR KIDS: $2k → 9%NORTHWEST FAMILY LIFE: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
OH
PA
CA
MO
NM
NC
HI
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$421k · 10 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
48

Total granted

$421k
$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+17%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalEmploymentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $271k · revenue -13%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $94k · revenue -16%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k

Funded once

  • CW
    CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY(CWU) FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $52k
  • WC
    WORLD CONCERN
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nexus Youth and Families

Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…

Human Services
2
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
3
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
4
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
5
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
6
Washington Society of Certified Public a

We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.

—
7
Young Womens Christian Association

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services
8
Pacific Skyline Council Boy Scouts of America

The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—
9
Seattle Classical Christian School

Sccs builds the city of god by forming servant leaders who love goodness, truth, and beauty.

Education
10
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
11
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
12
Humanities Washington

Humanities washington (hw) opens minds and bridges divides by creating spaces to explore different perspectives. we envision a state where all people seek a deeper understanding of others, themselves, and the human experience, in order to…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Scripture Union. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $94,250 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICACENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY(CWU) FOUNDATION: $52,000 · OtherCENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY(CWU) FOUNDATIONWORLD CONCERN: $30,000 · OtherWORLD CONCERNIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL BAY SCOUT OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherNATIONAL BAY SCOUT OF AMERICA FOUNDATIONCISPUS LEARNING CENTER: $25,000 · OtherCISPUS LEARNING CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $24,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $16,500 · OtherVINTAGE CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+40 more: $64,410 · Other+40 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND: $271,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUNDLIFE ENRICHMENT OPTIONS: $20,000 · EducationLIFE ENRICHMENT OPTIONS+2 more: $17,500 · Education+2 moreCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF WASHINGTON: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentRUN TO WIN OUTREACH: $4,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentSharias Closet: $15,000 · Human ServicesNorthwest Family Life Learning And Counseling Center: $5,000 · Human ServicesHolly House for Kids: $2,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $5,303 · InternationalSEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $4,100 · Community ImprovementFARESTART: $3,000 · Employment
Other$391,660Education$308,500Youth Development$35,000Human Services$22,000International$15,303Community Improvement$4,100Employment$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND: $271,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $94,250 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF WASHINGTON: $30,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetLIFE ENRICHMENT OPTIONS: $20,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSharias Closet: $15,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE NATIVITY SCHOOL: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $5,303 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION: $4,100 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRUN TO WIN OUTREACH: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFARESTART: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHolly House for Kids: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISLANDWOOD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONEAMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST KIDNEY CENTERS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 614 GRAND COLUMBIA COUNCIL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTERS OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds LIFE ENRICHMENT OPTIONS ↗
  • Who funds Sharias Closet ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN GENIUS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE NATIVITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Family Life Learning And Counseling Center ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE ROTARY SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RUN TO WIN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds Holly House for Kids ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred and Margaret Grimm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred and Margaret Grimm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fred and Margaret Grimm Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Fred and Margaret Grimm Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred and Margaret Grimm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph