Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fred & Louise Joachim Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$101k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$262kHealth$120kReligion$111kInternational$46kHuman Services$17kArts & Culture$15kMembership Benefit$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
$4,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$20,000
SHARE INTERNATIONAL$20,000
TOP OF THE HILL SCHOOL$20,000
SAFE HAVEN BABY BOX$16,496
WTSU$10,000
I AM CHURCH$5,000
JOACHIM SCHOLORSHIP FUND$4,500
PLAINVIEW LIONS CLUB$1,500
THE VINE$1,000
FATHERS IN THE FIELD$1,000
THE SILVER STAR ROOM$1,000
LOCKNEY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$500
LEGAL AID OF NORTH TEXAS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%25FORTY FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%SAFE HAVEN BABY BOX: $16k → 12%SHARE INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
IN
MO
WV
AZ
NM
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$394k · 20 repeat orgs$217k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
40

Total granted

$394k
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+44%

Still filing today

35%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COVENANT FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $77k · revenue +904%
  • FI
    FATHERS IN THE FIELD
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +14%
  • JP
    JUBILEE PRISON MINISTRY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • CH
    COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $58k · revenue -34%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $56k
  • MU
    MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +541%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
2
Samaritan's Purse

Samaritan's purse is a nondenominational evangelical christian organization providing spiritual and physical aid to hurting people around the world. since 1970, samaritan's purse has helped meet the needs of people who are victims of war,…

Religion
3
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
4
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
5
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
6
Eyewitness Missions
Philanthropy
7
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
8
The Covenant Foundation
—
9
Tri-State Christian Academy Inc

Our desire is to provide balanced, biblical direction to the child as a support to the home and to train each student to be self-disciplined and biblically directed in their walk with god and their fellow man. it is also our desire to meet…

Education
10
Sagos Institute of Preaching and Bible Exposition

The mission of our school can be divided into 4 areas:1.To cultivate students exegesis & preaching of the Scriptures rightly based on truth found in Bible. 2.To edify Bible study talents to teach Bible and lead Bible study as the focus of…

Education
11
Campus Movement

The ministty of campus movement exists to build laborers on the campus to see a movement of god that changes the world. our mission is to evangelize the lost, establish & equip young christians, and export them into the world to be…

Religion
12
International Orality Institute

The purpose of this corporation is international biblical education and the activities that make that goal possible. we seek to come alongside church bodies who desire to study god's work and assist them to teach their leaders a solid,…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fathers in the Field; the most unlike its peers is Lockney Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COVENANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $56,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTOP OF THE HILL SCHOOL: $47,000 · OtherTOP OF THE HILL SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWTSU: $10,000 · OtherJOACHIM SCHOLORSHIP FUND: $9,500 · OtherINTL INSTITUTE OF EVANGELISM: $9,000 · OtherI AM CHURCH: $9,000 · OtherJOACHIM SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $7,500 · Other+44 more: $54,659 · Other+44 moreWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $136,400 · EducationWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITYMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $25,000 · EducationMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION IN…PLAINVIEW CHRISTIAN ACADEMYINC: $14,000 · EducationPLAINVIEW CHRISTIAN ACADEMYINC+2 more: $2,875 · EducationCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC: $76,750 · PhilanthropyCOVENANT FOUND…SHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesSHARE INTERN…SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $16,496 · Human ServicesSAFE HAVEN B…25FORTY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human Services25FORTY FOUN…COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $58,250 · HealthCOVENANT H…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthSURE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 · ReligionJUBILEE PRISON MINISTRY: $2,750 · ReligionBIBLEPROJECT: $1,000 · ReligionFATHERS IN THE FIELD: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$219,659Education$178,275Philanthropy$76,750Human Services$66,496Health$59,250Religion$7,750Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $136,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC: $76,750 over 3y, 11% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $58,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC: $45,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC: $16,496 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPLAINVIEW CHRISTIAN ACADEMYINC: $14,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budget25FORTY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSURE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $4,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetFATHERS IN THE FIELD: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUBILEE PRISON MINISTRY: $2,750 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NORTHWEST TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOCKNEY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAINVIEW CHRISTIAN ACADEMYINC ↗
  • Who funds 25FORTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SURE FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds FATHERS IN THE FIELD ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE PRISON MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID OF NORTHWEST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of West TexasTX13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of West Texas · Texas Instruments Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fred & Louise Joachim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fred & Louise Joachim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fred & Louise Joachim Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fred & Louise Joachim Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fred & Louise Joachim’s filings →

More from the funding graph