Skip to content

· Public charity

Fraternal Order of Eagles Aerie 4168

Fraternal organization

$239k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$101kCrime & Legal$59kHousing & Shelter$48kReligion$47kHealth$40kEducation$35kPublic Benefit$15kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 20 grants below total $148,625, the rows itemized in this filing. The $238,640 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $90,015 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $71k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$18,625
FOP SHOP WITH A COP$17,000
ST BENEDICT JOSEPH HOMELESS SHELTER$15,000
OWENSBORO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$10,000
DANIEL PITINO SHELTER$10,000
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$7,000
WENDELL FOSTER CENTER$6,000
SHRINERS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$5,000
LOCAL 870 OBORO PROFESSIONAL FIREFI$5,000
PIRATES PROLES INC$5,000
OCTC$5,000
SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
DUST BOWL$5,000
ST JOSEPH PEACE MISSION$5,000
CASA OF OHIO VALLEY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MUNDAY ACTIVITY CENTER: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$298k · 15 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
17

Total granted

$298k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+71%

Still filing today

33%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FOP SHOP WITH A COP
    5× · 2021–2025 · $49k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH PEACE MISSION
    5× · 2018–2025 · $47k
  • WF
    WENDELL FOSTER CENTER
    4× · 2018–2025 · $27k

Funded once

  • BC
    BOULWARE CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $16k
  • KS
    KENTUCKY STATE TREASURER TORNADO RE
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • GR
    GREEN RIVER AREA DOWNS SYNDROME
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Owensboro Area Shelter Information and Services Inc

To provide shelter, support, and advocacy to families affected by domestic violence

—
2
Kentucky Senior Citizens Apartments Inc

Provide staffing and services to operate apartment complexes for senior citizens in northern kentucky.

—
3
Seneca County Council On Homelessness Inc

Homeless shelter

Human Services
4
William S Davies Homeless Shelter

The mission of the organization is to provide a safe haven to the homeless of the rome, georgia area

Housing & Shelter
5
Women's Shelter Inc

The mission of women's shelter, inc. is to assist victims of domestic violence, women, individuals and families, by establishing and maintaining a facility which will provide temporary shelter and services to these victims.

Human Services
6
My Sisters House Inc

Services for abused women & their children

—
7
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
8
Casa of South Central Kentucky Inc

Volunteers in action seeking safety and permanency for our community's youngest victims. casa provides support, advocacy, and intervention for abused, neglected, and dependent children in south central ky's family court system.

Crime & Legal
9
Casa of Midwest Kentucky Inc

To provide advocacy for abused and neglected children in the hopkins, webster, henderson, union, muhlenberg, and crittenden county's courts, in schools, and in the community.

Civil Rights
10
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
11
Center in the Woods Inc

The center in the woods' mission is to provide the highest quality of life for older adults in southwestern pennsylvania.

—
12
Wesley Child Care Center

Wesley's mission is to provide a trusted, nurturing, secure and developmentally enriching experience for children, serving the unique needs of families within our community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Ohio Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Brescia University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOP SHOP WITH A COP: $49,180 · OtherFOP SHOP WITH A COPST JOSEPH PEACE MISSION: $47,000 · OtherST JOSEPH PEACE MISSIONWENDELL FOSTER CENTER: $26,998 · OtherWENDELL FOSTER CENTERST BENEDICT JOSEPH HOMELESS SHELTER: $24,054 · OtherST BENEDICT JOSEPH HOMELESS SHELTERIndividual grant recipient: $18,625 · OtherBOULWARE CENTER: $16,200 · OtherYMCA: $16,000 · OtherSENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,500 · OtherKENTUCKY STATE TREASURER TORNADO RE: $15,000 · OtherOCTC: $15,000 · OtherWEST KY WOLFPACK FOOTBALL: $15,000 · Other+23 more: $148,500 · Other+23 moreBRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 · EducationKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $15,000 · EducationDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC: $16,200 · Housing & ShelterMY SISTERS KEEPER INCORPORATED: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterOWENSBORO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsSENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER OF OWENSBORO-DAVIESS COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$407,057Education$30,000Housing & Shelter$23,700Arts & Culture$10,000Civil Rights$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC: $16,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOWENSBORO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMY SISTERS KEEPER INCORPORATED: $7,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER OF OWENSBORO-DAVIESS COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DANIEL PITINO SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BRESCIA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HL NEBLETT COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OWENSBORO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds MY SISTERS KEEPER INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR COMMUNITY CENTER OF OWENSBORO-DAVIESS COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Owensboro Health IncKY20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Owensboro Health Inc · B J Killian Foundation · Public Life Foundation of Owensboro · Impact 100 - Owensboro Inc · Lester E Yeager Charitable Trust B · Marilyn & William Young Charitable Foundation Inc C/O Sara Hemingway Ex Di · Baird Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · The Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fraternal Order of Eagles Aerie 4168 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fraternal Order of Eagles Aerie 4168. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fraternal Order of Eagles Aerie 4168’s filings →

    More from the funding graph