· Private foundation
Franks L Wyenberg Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $262k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTER FOR TRAUMA COUNSELING INC | $20,000 |
| CITY ON A HILL INC | $20,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PALM BEACH COUNT | $15,000 |
| INTEGRATION SUPPORT NETWORK OUTREACH | $15,000 |
| LOTUS LEGAL CLINIC | $15,000 |
| JACOB S ZWEIG FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| META HOUSE INC | $12,000 |
| KATHYS HOUSE INC | $10,000 |
| BETTER STEWARDS | $10,000 |
| MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION | $10,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA | $10,000 |
| FEED THE HUNGRY PANTRY OF PALM BEACH | $10,000 |
| FAMILY CENTRAL INC | $10,000 |
| SAINT THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL INC | $10,000 |
| DISMAS MINISTRY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $363k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC6× · 2019–2024 · $120k · revenue +76%
- CFCenter for Trauma Counseling Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +67%
- GPGrandmas Place Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $30k
- MTMEMORY TREES CORPORATIONone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +17% · 32% of their budget
RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.
Lighthouse for the blind of the palm beaches, inc's mission is to assist persons with visual impairments to develop their capabilities to the fullest and to utilize them in the pursuits of life which are the right and privilege of all.
Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.
The organization is a non-profit organization and is committed to providing accessible comprehensive high quality primary and preventive care services to all persons with dignity and respect. our focus is on preventive care and health…
Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.
To enhance opportunities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) to participate fully in their community as valued neighbors, productive workers and respected citizens. portal, inc. assists more than 200 adults…
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
Empowerment through employment for blind or visually impaired individuals.
The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…
Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)
The area agency on aging of palm beach/treasure coast is a private, non-profit, regional agency whose mission is to advocate, plan and promote the independence, dignity, health and well-being of seniors and their caregivers in a manner…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tiki Kiti & Poni Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Trauma Counseling Inc ↗
- Who funds CITY ON A HILL INC ↗
- Who funds Grandmas Place Inc ↗
- Who funds Help Our Wounded Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE JACOB S ZWEIG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds META HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN VETERANS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ST CATHERINE RESIDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds OSHKOSH AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds VIVENT HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds Family Promise of Southeast Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds MEMORY TREES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE DISABILITY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MIND&MELODY INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST STAGE MILWAUKEE ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds CLINICS CAN HELP INC ↗
- Who funds RIVEREDGE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BROADSCOPE DISABILITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AFAR INC DBA THE ABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN ↗
- Who funds Center for Family Services of Palm Beach County Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Youth Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Gardner Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust · Quantum Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Franks L Wyenberg Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Grandmas Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc — 6% of income from government
- Center for Trauma Counseling Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.