Skip to content

· Private foundation

Franklin W & Helen S Bowen Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
52
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.6MReligion$138kHuman Services$40kFood & Nutrition$13kHealth$11kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k50 grants · $139k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$2,751
Median grant
7
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTERN UNIVERSITY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ALEX DESHELTER CO CEDARVILLE UNIV$7,000
MATT EASTER CO MT VERNON NAZARENE UNIV$7,000
DEVIN FREEMAN CO EASTERN UNIVERSITY$6,000
TURAN RUSH CO NEW HOPE COMMUNITY CHURCH$5,000
CASEY DAWSON CO EASTERN UNIVERSITY$4,950
MICHELLE DAWSON CO EASTERN UNIVERSITY$4,950
JILLENE NARRAWAY CO EASTERN UNIVERSITY$4,839
OLIVIA TUNNELL CO EASTERN UNIVERSITY$4,352
Individual grant recipient$4,000
COLE LINDER CO EASTERN UNIVERSITY$3,842
JORDAN CASTO CO EASTERN UNIVERISTY$3,651
ANDREW KIDDLE CO EASTERN UNIVERSITY$3,611
CLAIRE COTTRILL CO EASTERN UNIVERSITY$3,522
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
WV
VA
AZ
NC
SC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 98 repeat orgs$362k to everyone else

98 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 68 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

98
119

Total granted

$1.7M
$316k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+60%

Still filing today

11%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    EASTERN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2025 · $353k · revenue +75%
  • BU
    BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $70k · revenue +15%
  • GT
    Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $24k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA BAPTIST CONVENTION
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • PT
    PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
2
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
3
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
4
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
5
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
6
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
9
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
10
East Texas Baptist University

East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…

Education
11
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
12
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Samford University; the most unlike its peers is Columbia International University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $222,159 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST VIRIGINIA BAPTIST CONVENTION: $76,115 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $59,850 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $59,100 · Other+182 more: $1,014,150 · Other+182 moreEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $353,430 · EducationEASTERN UNIVERSITYBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $70,000 · EducationBIOLA UNIVERSITY INCGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc: $24,000 · EducationALDERSON BROADDUS UNIVERSITY INC: $22,690 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $20,072 · Education+8 more: $55,000 · Education+8 moreBAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human Services
Other$1,431,374Education$545,192Human Services$40,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $353,430 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc: $24,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALDERSON BROADDUS UNIVERSITY INC: $22,690 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $20,072 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $10,715 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $10,102 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC: $9,183 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN EVANGELICAL SEMINARY: $3,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIAN BIBLE COLLEGE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSamford University: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALDERSON BROADDUS UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN16.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Carter Family Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Servant Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Verizon Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Franklin W & Helen S Bowen Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Franklin W & Helen S Bowen Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Franklin W & Helen S Bowen Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Franklin W & Helen S Bowen Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 241 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Franklin W & Helen S Bowen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph