Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frank S & Antoinette G Leta Family Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$164k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$271kHuman Services$264kScience & Tech$94kHousing & Shelter$77kYouth Development$72kReligion$66kFood & Nutrition$53kEducation$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$858k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$50,000
EPWORTH CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES$30,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$26,595
ST LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$13,516
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ST LOUIS$7,964
Individual grant recipient$6,000
CARITAS CONNECTIONS$5,000
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS$3,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS$3,000
GOOD SHEPHERD CATHOLIC CHURCH ST VINCENT DEPAUL$3,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$3,000
HOLY INFANT ST VINCENT DE PAUL$3,000
MICHAEL BROWN SR CHOSEN FOR CHANGE FUND$2,500
ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART$1,500
THE COVERING HOUSE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DIVINE NEST: $4k → 10%CARE TO LEARN: $3k → 15%EVERY CHILD'S HOPE: $3k → 11%EYE THRIVE: $100 → 21%O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $150 → 5%O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $150 → 5%O'FALLON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100 → 5%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $200 → 21%DEFENDERS OF THE UNBORN: $13k → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%THE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%THE COVERING HOUSE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
OH
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Frank S & Antoinette G Leta Family Charitable Foundation Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Frank S & Antoinette G Leta Family Charitable Foundation Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$859k · 32 repeat orgs$244k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
50

Total granted

$859k
$223k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+7%

Still filing today

47%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsEducationArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $169k · revenue +59%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $84k · revenue +4%
  • SP
    ST PATRICK CENTER
    4× · 2017–2021 · $67k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • SL
    SAINT LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $74k
  • DO
    Defenders of the Unborn
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue -34%
  • WB
    WORLD BIRD SANCTUARYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
2
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
3
St Patrick Partnership Center

To transform lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

—
4
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
5
St Louis Health Equipment Lending Program Inc

St. louis help is dedicated to providing community members with donated medical equipment, promoting independence, health and environmental responsibility.

Health
6
St Louis Life

To enable individuals with developmental disabilities to achieve the highest level of independent living and live a full and enriched life.

Housing & Shelter
7
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
8
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
9
Saint Louis Counseling Inc

The mission of saint louis counseling is to bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate caring presence. the purpose of saint louis counseling is "guided by the teachings of jesus christ, saint…

—
10
St Louis Christian College

Saint louis christian college prepares biblical servant leaders for urban, suburban, rural, and global ministry.

—
11
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
12
St Martin's Child Center

Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Food Search Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ray & Diana Mungenast Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/45
Grantees still filing
24/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $166,825 · OtherEPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INCSAINT LOUIS SCIENCE CENTER: $74,000 · OtherSAINT LOUIS SCIENCE CENTERST PATRICK CENTER: $67,207 · OtherST PATRICK CENTERSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $32,756 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ST LOUIS: $28,946 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $26,400 · OtherACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART: $24,725 · Other+67 more: $241,318 · Other+67 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $169,255 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARC…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $84,070 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC+2 more: $5,742 · HealthCaritas Connections Inc: $47,246 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $250 · Food & NutritionStray Rescue of St Louis: $31,832 · AnimalsWORLD BIRD SANCTUARY: $11,058 · Animals+1 more: $250 · AnimalsSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $34,403 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $800 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $32,481 · Youth DevelopmentDefenders of the Unborn: $13,289 · Human ServicesDIVINE NEST: $4,289 · Human ServicesTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Human ServicesEvangelical Children's Home: $3,000 · Human ServicesCare to Learn: $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE COVERING HOUSE: $1,000 · Human Services+3 more: $700 · Human Services
Other$662,177Health$259,067Food & Nutrition$47,496Animals$43,140Arts & Culture$35,203Youth Development$32,481Human Services$28,278

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $169,255 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $166,825 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $84,070 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $67,207 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCaritas Connections Inc: $47,246 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetSAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $34,403 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $32,481 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetStray Rescue of St Louis: $31,832 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetST LOUIS AUTO DEALERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $11,200 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetWORLD BIRD SANCTUARY: $11,058 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST CHARLES COUNTY: $9,842 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBrace for Impact 46 Inc: $9,193 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetJason Motte Foundation Inc: $6,700 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,108 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMiracles N Progress Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetDIVINE NEST: $4,289 over 1y, 41% of budgetTHE LITTLE BIT FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEvangelical Children's Home: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCare to Learn: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SAINT JOSEPH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST PETERS HOCKEY CLUB: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COVERING HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZOE INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST CHARLES CITY COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMaryville University - St Louis: $742 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $742 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE CENTER FOR EARLY LEARNING: $580 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREDO OF THE CATHOLIC LAITY: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE RAY & DIANA MUNGENAST FAMILY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetO'FALLON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $400 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMID AMERICAN VETERANS MUSEUM: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEYE THRIVE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA GATEWAY CHAPTER: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PATRICK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Caritas Connections Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAINT LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Stray Rescue of St Louis ↗
  • Who funds Defenders of the Unborn ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AUTO DEALERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD BIRD SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ST CHARLES COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Brace for Impact 46 Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jason Motte Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds Miracles N Progress Inc ↗
  • Who funds DIVINE NEST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO29.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · The Bellwether Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · St Louis Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank S & Antoinette G Leta Family Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank S & Antoinette G Leta Family Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frank S & Antoinette G Leta Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph