How much does Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 give?

Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 reported 24 grants totaling $616,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 19 and 24 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.

What does Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 fund?

By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (29%), Health (25%), Arts & Culture (16%).

Who are Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: The Center for Hearing and Speech ($853k), Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ($455k), Girl Scouts - North Carolina Coastal Pines Inc ($335k).

Does Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Triangle Community Foundation Inc, Duke Energy Foundation, Shell USA Company Foundation.

Where is Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 based?

Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 is based in MO.

Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004

Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 at a glance

· Private foundation

Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$617k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$153k

Largest

01What it funds

0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHealth$893kArts & Culture$575kYouth Development$367kHuman Services$186kReligion$140kInternational$70kAnimals$50kOther$0

02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k5 grants · $21k
$10k–50k15 grants · $258k
$50k–250k4 grants · $338k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$8.4M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
TEXAS HEARING INSTITUTE	$153,000
TEXAS CITY ISD FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE	$75,000
THE COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATIO	$60,000
GIRL SCOUTS-NC COASTAL PINES	$50,000
TEXAS CITY ROTARY FOUNDATION	$46,000
The Salvation Army	$35,000
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION	$25,000
COLLEGE OF THE MAINLAND FOUNDATION	$22,000
COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL	$20,000
CAMP FERN LEGACY INC	$15,000
READ AND FEED	$15,000
RALEIGH CITY FARM INC	$10,000
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION	$10,000
FRIENDS MEETING OF RALEIGH	$10,000
SCIENCE MILL	$10,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$3.3M · 27 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.3M

$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%

-21%

Still filing today

67%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TC
THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH
6× · 2020–2025 · $853k · revenue +87%
GIRL SCOUTS - NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL PINES INC
6× · 2020–2025 · $335k · revenue +27%
TC
TEXAS CITY ROTARY FOUNDATION
6× · 2020–2025 · $257k · revenue +104% · 54% of their budget

Funded once

UW
UNITED WAY GALVESTON COUNTY MAINLAND INC
one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -37%
GI
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
one grant, 2023 · $15k
FL
FORMING LIVES INC
one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -84%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education

Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development

Girls Inc of Chattanooga

Girls inc. of chattanooga inspires and equips girls to be strong, smart and bold leaders within their families, their communities and society.

Youth Development

Washington Leadership Academy Public Charter School

Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.

Education

Council of Chief State School Officers

Ccsso through leadership, advocacy and service, assists chief state school officers and their organizations in achieving the vision of an american education system that enables all children to succeed in school, work, and life.

Education

Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education

The Miller School of Albemarle

We create opportunities for discovery and reflection by engaging the minds, hands, and hearts of our students.

Education

Girl Scouts of Central Illinois

Girl scouts builds girls of courage, confidence, and character who make the world a better place.

—

Center City Public Charter Schools

Center city public charter schools (center city pcs) empowers our students for lifelong success by building strong character, promoting academic excellence, and generating public service throughout washington, d.c.

Education

The Chestnut Hill School

At the chestnut hill school, our mission to educate children is deeply rooted in a commitment to academic excellence, diversity, and community. we engage, challenge and support children as they develop the skills and confidence to achieve…

Education

Chicago Collegiate Inc

To equip all students in grades six through twelve with the academic skills, intellectual habits and character traits to succeed in the college of their choice, strenghten their communities and change the world.

Education

Citizen Schools Inc

In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…

Education

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Read and Feed; the most unlike its peers is The Institute for Civility in Government. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/26

Grantees still filing

15/26

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$1,294,000Education$1,136,918Arts & Culture$564,800Youth Development$342,579Human Services$80,000International$70,000Health$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004?

Find your warmest path to Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home