· Private foundation
Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $258k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $338k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEXAS HEARING INSTITUTE | $153,000 |
| TEXAS CITY ISD FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE | $75,000 |
| THE COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATIO | $60,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS-NC COASTAL PINES | $50,000 |
| TEXAS CITY ROTARY FOUNDATION | $46,000 |
| The Salvation Army | $35,000 |
| GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| COLLEGE OF THE MAINLAND FOUNDATION | $22,000 |
| COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| CAMP FERN LEGACY INC | $15,000 |
| READ AND FEED | $15,000 |
| RALEIGH CITY FARM INC | $10,000 |
| ROTARY INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS MEETING OF RALEIGH | $10,000 |
| SCIENCE MILL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against -21% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH6× · 2020–2025 · $853k · revenue +87%
GIRL SCOUTS - NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL PINES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $335k · revenue +27%- TCTEXAS CITY ROTARY FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $257k · revenue +104% · 54% of their budget
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY GALVESTON COUNTY MAINLAND INCone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -37%
- FLFORMING LIVES INCone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -84%
- GIGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYone grant, 2023 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.
Girls inc. of chattanooga inspires and equips girls to be strong, smart and bold leaders within their families, their communities and society.
Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.
Ccsso through leadership, advocacy and service, assists chief state school officers and their organizations in achieving the vision of an american education system that enables all children to succeed in school, work, and life.
All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.
We create opportunities for discovery and reflection by engaging the minds, hands, and hearts of our students.
Girl scouts builds girls of courage, confidence, and character who make the world a better place.
Center city public charter schools (center city pcs) empowers our students for lifelong success by building strong character, promoting academic excellence, and generating public service throughout washington, d.c.
At the chestnut hill school, our mission to educate children is deeply rooted in a commitment to academic excellence, diversity, and community. we engage, challenge and support children as they develop the skills and confidence to achieve…
To equip all students in grades six through twelve with the academic skills, intellectual habits and character traits to succeed in the college of their choice, strenghten their communities and change the world.
In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Read and Feed and the most unlike its peers is The Institute for Civility in Government. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ↗
- Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS - NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL PINES INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS CITY ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF THE MAINLAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE MILL ↗
- Who funds READ AND FEED ↗
- Who funds PHEASANTS FOREVER INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SCHOOL CHAPLAIN ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY PREP INC ↗
- Who funds FOSTER VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds LOBULAR BREAST CANCER ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DPS HUB FARM LTD ↗
- Who funds The Institute for Civility in Government ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY GALVESTON COUNTY MAINLAND INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP FERN LEGACY INC ↗
- Who funds FORMING LIVES INC ↗
- Who funds MILL CREEK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC ↗
- Who funds RALEIGH CITY FARM INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHER UP TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds GULF COAST BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004?
Find your warmest path to Frank K Webb Charitable Trust 480006004 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.