Skip to content

· Private foundation

Francis Kerscher Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$138kReligion$21kRecreation & Sports$8kHealth$6kPhilanthropy$2kCivil Rights$1kYouth Development$822Food & Nutrition$650Other$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$100
Median grant
6
States reached
$471k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$10,100
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$7,945
CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESE OF GREEN BAY INC$2,000
RONCALLI CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$2,000
FRIENDS OF ST PATRICK'S$1,050
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$300
INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME$300
ST CATHERINE'S HIGH SCHOOL$200
ALANO SOCIETY$150
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$150
RACINE CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$100
SISTERS OF ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI$100
NOTRE DAME ACADEMY$100
Individual grant recipient$50
MANITOWOC PUBLIC LIBRARY$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
CA
NE
AZ
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$194k · 33 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
11

Total granted

$194k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+4%

Still filing today

36%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    Marquette University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $74k · revenue +46%
  • AW
    ASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k · revenue +19%
  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME
    7× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +388%

Funded once

  • CF
    CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR DIOCESE OF GREEN BAY
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • ML
    MANITOWOC LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
2
Sunshine House Inc

Sunshine resources of door county enriches lives to nurture and inspire the human spirit with care, compassion, partnership and integrity.

Human Services
3
Saint John's Communities Inc

Our mission is to enrich the lives of older adults through gracious retirement living, spiritual growth, cultural and educational opportunities and health care services.

Human Services
4
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
5
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

—
6
Mercy Medical Center Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

—
7
Mercy Harvard Hospital Inc

The mission of mercy harvard hospital, inc. (mhh) is "exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better." the foundation of this mission is based on a vision of quality: excellence in patient care; service:…

Health
8
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
9
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
10
Advocate Health Care Network

The mission of advocate health care is to serve the health needs of individuals, families and communities through a wholistic philosophy rooted in our fundamental understanding of human beings as created in the image of god.

Health
11
United Way of Wisconsin Inc

United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…

Philanthropy
12
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ascension Wisconsin Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Joes Suburban Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONCALLI HIGH SCHOOL: $53,100 · OtherRONCALLI HIGH SCHOOLFRIENDS OF ST PATRICKS INC: $7,064 · OtherFRIENDS OF ST PATRICKS INCCATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESE OF GREEN BAY INC: $5,000 · Other+37 more: $35,845 · Other+37 moreMarquette University: $73,865 · EducationMarquette University+3 more: $500 · EducationASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $13,600 · PhilanthropyINCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $50 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME: $8,555 · Arts & CultureLIGHTHOUSE RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $875 · HealthHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $750 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 · HealthJOES SUBURBAN CLUB INC: $270 · HealthALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $1,300 · Civil RightsPETERS PANTRY INC: $650 · Food & Nutrition
Other$101,009Education$74,365Philanthropy$14,650Arts & Culture$8,555Health$2,395Civil Rights$1,300Food & Nutrition$650

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $73,865 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC: $13,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME: $8,555 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetSILVER LAKE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY FAMILY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $875 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION: $750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPETERS PANTRY INC: $650 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHINSDALE CENTRAL FOUNDATION: $300 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALANO SOCIETY INC: $150 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSUN CITY CENTER EMERGENCY SQUAD NUMBER ONE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $60 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARY AND MARTHA HOUSE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAVEN OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds ASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds SILVER LAKE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds INCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PETERS PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HINSDALE CENTRAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOES SUBURBAN CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALANO SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lakeshore Community Foundation IncWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Francis Kerscher Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Francis Kerscher Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Francis Kerscher Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Francis Kerscher Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Francis Kerscher’s filings →

More from the funding graph