Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frances Saunders Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$165kReligion$101kHuman Services$94kInternational$45kFood & Nutrition$22kYouth Development$8kEducation$7kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$504k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
LIVE ACTION$5,000
UNITED FOR LIFE OF MERCED COUNTY$4,000
UNBOUND$3,000
KNOM RADIO MISSIONS$2,800
ST PATRICK'S PARISH$2,500
CALIFORNIA RIGHT TO LIFE$2,000
JMJ MATERNITY HOMES$1,500
PRIESTS FOR LIFE$1,500
CATHOLIC BISHOP OF NORTHERN ALASKA$1,000
STUDENTS FOR LIFE OF AMERICA$1,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR$1,000
CATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC$500
ANUGRAHA ACT INC$500
WORLD VILLAGES FOR CHILDREN$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNBOUND: $4k → 16%American Wheelchair Mission: $100 → 13%UNBOUND: $3k → 16%UNBOUND: $3k → 16%UNBOUND: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
NV
SD
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
DC
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$443k · 36 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
12

Total granted

$443k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+25%

Still filing today

25%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    JMJ MATERNITY HOMES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +27%
  • KR
    KNOM Radio Mission Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +17%
  • SO
    SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • CR
    CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • IH
    Immaculate Heart RadioRelevant Radio
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • CC
    Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Passionlife Ministries Inc

Passionlife ministries is a global missions initiative to spread the gospel of life and expand the pregnancy help movement among nations plagued by abortion, infanticide and gendercide.

Religion
2
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
3
Pro-Life Action League Inc

Dissemination of pro-life information

Civil Rights
4
A Choice for Life Inc

Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…

—
5
Living His Life Abundantly International

To inform, instruct and inspire people through the media about the sacred scriptures and teachings of the roman catholic church

Religion
6
Catholics for Choice

Catholics for Choice - which serves the pro-choice Catholic majority - encounters, educates, and emboldens people of faith who support reproductive freedom. Catholics for Choice believes healthcare is a human right and that includes access…

Civil Rights
7
Save a Life International Inc

Save a life international helps women in crisis; including crisis pregnancies, domestic violence, post-abortion depression and other types of hardships. they provide education and bring awareness to young people about the importance of…

Human Services
8
Americans United for Life Inc

AUL is an organization that advances the human right to life in culture, law, and policy.

Civil Rights
9
Life Advancement Group

To rescue lives from the destruction of abortion through innovative marketing, strategy, and technology solutions.

—
10
Life Matters Worldwide

Life Matters Worldwide encourages, equips and strengthens pregnancy care workers so they can continue to provide life-affirming services.

Civil Rights
11
Pro-Life Action Ministries Inc

Pro-Life Action Ministries, Inc. is an interdenominational Christian organization dedicated to publicly defending the sanctity of human life & saving lives from abortion, infanticide & euthanasia through peaceful direct-action & education…

—
12
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Anugraha Act Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $99,490 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC BISHOP OF NORTHERN ALASKA: $18,000 · OtherCATHOLIC BISHOP OF NORTHERN ALASKACATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FRESNO: $16,700 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF FRESNOCALIFORNIA RIGHT TO LIFE: $15,800 · OtherCALIFORNIA RIGHT TO LIFECATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC INC: $13,950 · OtherUNITED FOR LIFE OF MERCED COUNTY: $11,900 · OtherAMERICAN LIFE LEAGUE INC: $11,500 · Other+28 more: $106,250 · Other+28 moreJMJ MATERNITY HOMES: $33,755 · Human ServicesJMJ MATERNI…Unbound: $10,500 · Human ServicesUnbound+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $21,000 · InternationalSISTER OF…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $16,500 · InternationalFOOD FOR …KNOM Radio Mission Inc: $21,800 · ReligionIMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC: $11,200 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionPRIESTS FOR LIFE: $21,500 · Youth DevelopmentANUGRAHA ACT INC: $5,450 · Youth Development+1 more: $100 · Youth DevelopmentLIVE ACTION: $17,500 · Civil RightsStudents for Life of America Inc: $1,000 · Civil RightsJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $500 · Public Benefit
Other$293,590Human Services$44,355International$37,500Religion$34,000Youth Development$27,050Civil Rights$18,500Public Benefit$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJMJ MATERNITY HOMES: $33,755 over 8y, 13% of budgetKNOM Radio Mission Inc: $21,800 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPRIESTS FOR LIFE: $21,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $21,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $17,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LIFE LEAGUE INC: $11,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetIMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC: $11,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnbound: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANUGRAHA ACT INC: $5,450 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF MERCED COUNTY: $700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JMJ MATERNITY HOMES ↗
  • Who funds KNOM Radio Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRIESTS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LIFE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMACULATE HEART MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds ANUGRAHA ACT INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
  • Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacred Heart Trust FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacred Heart Trust Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frances Saunders Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frances Saunders Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Frances Saunders Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Frances Saunders Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frances Saunders’ filings →

More from the funding graph