Skip to content

· Private foundation

Frances & Jane S Lausche Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$57kReligion$57kEducation$45kHealth$30kFood & Nutrition$24kEmployment$12kArts & Culture$6kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SLOVENIAN CULTURAL GARDEN$5,000
SLOVENSKA PRISTAVA$5,000
ST MARY CHURCH BLESSED MOTHER$5,000
OUR LADY OF LOURDES SHRINE$4,000
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$3,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CLEVELAND$3,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$3,000
AMERICAN MUTUAL LIFE ASSOCIATION$2,500
ST VITUS CHURCH HALL$2,000
CLEVELAND SIGHT BANK$2,000
ST VITUS CHURCH HALL$2,000
VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES$2,000
HOSPICE OF WESTERN RESERVE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%SLOVENSKA PRISTAVA: $5k → 17%SLOVENSKA PRISTAVA: $4k → 17%SLOVENSKA PRISTAVA: $3k → 17%SLOVENSKA PRISTAVA: $3k → 17%SLOVENSKA PRISTAVA: $3k → 17%SLOVENSKA PRISTAVA: $3k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $2k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $2k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $2k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $2k → 17%ROSE MARY CENTER: $2k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $2k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$224k · 20 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$224k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+235%

Still filing today

30%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST OHIO INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +7%
  • VG
    VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +6%
  • RT
    ROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • BH
    BENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • TG
    THE GATHERING PLACE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +5%
  • SM
    Slovenian Museum and Archives Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +235%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
2
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
3
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
4
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
5
Diabetes Partnership of Cleveland

Diabetes partnership of cleveland works to provide relevant and sustainable programming, education, resources and supplies to the community in northeast ohio affected by diabetes.

—
6
Goodwill Industries of Greater Cleveland and East Central Ohio Inc

We empower people on their journey to independence through the sale of donated goods, which supports employment programs and family services.

—
7
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
8
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
9
St Vincent Depaul Rehabilitation Service of Texas Inc

Setting a new standard of employment for people who have disabilities and chronic medical conditions.

Employment
10
Cleveland Hearing and Speech Center

Cleveland hearing and speech is the premier provider of hearing, speech-language and deaf services, education, and advocacy helping people connect through communication, regardless of ability to pay.

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Slovenian Museum and Archives Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUR LADY OF LOURDES SHRINE: $21,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF LOURDES SHRINECUYAHOGA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $16,500 · OtherCUYAHOGA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGEST VITUS CHURCH HALL: $16,000 · OtherST VITUS CHURCH HALLST AUGUSTINE HUNGER CENTER: $14,000 · OtherST AUGUSTINE HUNGER CENTERAMERICAN MUTUAL LIFE ASSOCIATION: $12,500 · OtherAMERICAN MUTUAL LIFE ASSOCIATIONHOSPICE OF WESTERN RESERVE: $12,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF WESTERN RESERVECLEVELAND SIGHT BANK: $12,000 · OtherCLEVELAND SIGHT BANKST MARY'S CHURCH ATRIUM: $10,500 · OtherST MARY'S CHURCH ATRIUMST MARY CHURCH BLESSED MOTHER: $9,000 · OtherST MARY CHURCH BLESSED MOTHERVILLA ANGELA ST JOSEPH HIGH SCHOOL: $8,000 · Other+9 more: $32,000 · Other+9 moreSLOVENSKA PRISTAVA INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesSLOVENSKA PRISTAVA…ROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesROSE-MARY THE JOHA…CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $7,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES…THE GATHERING PLACE: $2,000 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST OHIO INC: $14,000 · HealthVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $12,000 · EmploymentGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSlovenian Museum and Archives Inc: $2,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$163,500Human Services$40,000Health$14,000Employment$12,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Arts & Culture$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSLOVENSKA PRISTAVA INC: $21,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST OHIO INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSlovenian Museum and Archives Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SLOVENSKA PRISTAVA INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ROSE-MARY THE JOHANNA GRASSELLI REHABILITATION&EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Slovenian Museum and Archives Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Frances & Jane S Lausche Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Frances & Jane S Lausche Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Frances & Jane S Lausche’s filings →

    More from the funding graph