Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

Fran-Man Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2025
9
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$500
Largest grant, FY2025
$1,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 11
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$57k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Fran-Man Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving9$7k0%
FY20249$7k0%
FY20239$7k0%
FY20229$7k0%
FY20219$7k0%
FY202010$7k10%
FY201910$7k0%
FY201811$7k0%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$14kEducation$8kReligion$8kYouth Development$4kInternational$4kHuman Services$4kCivil Rights$4kArts & Culture$4kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($3k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Fran-Man Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders New York City Inc: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSjogren's Foundation Inc: $6,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Aid Society: $4,550 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Door - a Center of Alternatives Inc: $4,550 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens Committee for Children of New York Inc: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Touchstone Center for Children Inc: $4,500 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetSave Venice Inc: $4,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLineage Project Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Country Camps Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Partnership to End Homelessness Inc: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Fran-Man Foundation Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fran-Man Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Fran-Man Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Fran-Man Foundation Inc

How much does Fran-Man Foundation Inc give?
Fran-Man Foundation Inc reported 9 grants totaling $6,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 11 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Fran-Man Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (25%), Education (15%), Religion (15%).
Who are Fran-Man Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association ($9k), New York University ($9k), Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders New York City Inc ($9k).
Does Fran-Man Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Fran-Man Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Fran-Man Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Fran-Man Foundation Inc based?
Fran-Man Foundation Inc is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fran-Man’s filings →

More from the funding graph