· Private foundation
Fox Family Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k30 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $54k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DANBURY HOSPITAL & NEW MILFORD HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| THE YELLOW TULIP PROJECT | $15,000 |
| PREBLE STREET | $14,000 |
| BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| TUFTS UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES | $3,130 |
| THE HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND | $3,000 |
| IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT | $3,000 |
| MERCY LEARNING CENTER | $3,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $3,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC | $2,250 |
| PIETA | $2,000 |
| THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH | $2,000 |
| WAVENY CARE CENTER INC | $2,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CONNECTICUT | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
40 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TYThe Yellow Tulip Project5× · 2018–2023 · $55k · revenue +281%
- PSPREBLE STREET4× · 2018–2023 · $44k · revenue +174%
Trustees of Tufts College6× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- BLBRONX LETTERS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -37%
- TETHE EXPLORERS CLUBgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +137%
- WAWATERAID AMERICA INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Learning Center of Bridgeport Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bronx Letters Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Norwalk Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Yellow Tulip Project ↗
- Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
- Who funds WESTPORT VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY LEARNING CENTER OF BRIDGEPORT INC ↗
- Who funds HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CASCO BAY ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds FURNITURE FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE & HOSPICE OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE SUSAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BRONX LETTERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE EXPLORERS CLUB ↗
- Who funds MAINE WOMEN'S LOBBY EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds WATERAID AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE MACULA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOMES WITH HOPE ↗
- Who funds WAVENY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Smilow Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The James & Mary Ellen Marpe Family Foundation · Newman's Own Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Fjc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Maine Community Foundation Inc · The Jane T Muhlethaler Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fox Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Sound — 37% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Homes With Hope — 28% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Domestic Violence Crisis Center — 10% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc — 5% of income from government
- Mercy Learning Center of Bridgeport Inc — 4% of income from government
- Westport Historical Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Achievement First Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.