Skip to content

· Public charity

Foundation for Inspiration and Recognition of Science & Technology in T

FIRST in Texas provides life-changing robotics programs that equip young peple across Texas with skills, confidence, and resilience to build a better world.

$851k
Granted FY2019
38
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$1.3MYouth Development$76kScience & Tech$35kCrime & Legal$16kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2019 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 38 grants below total $448,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $850,766 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $402,166 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k22 grants · $157k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $292k
$9,150
Median grant
1
States reached
$763k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DALLAS ISD$48,050
HOUSTON ISD$34,350
LEANDER ISD$28,825
LUBBOCK ISD$21,825
MCALLEN ISD$21,250
WESTA$19,350
MISSION CISD$15,900
HARLINGEN CISD$15,050
LEWISVILLE ISD$13,725
CONROE ISD$11,550
PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD$11,200
PLANO ISD$10,475
CORPUS CHRISTI ISD$10,200
MESQUITE ISD$10,100
TOMBALL ISD$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROCKWALL-HEATH HIGH SCHOOL: $13k → 5%DALLAS ISD: $51k → 14%JUDSON ISD: $14k → 16%SOMERSET ISD: $17k → 16%HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $16k → 16%LUBBOCK ISD: $22k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI ISD: $16k → 17%MISSION ISD: $21k → 27%FIRST: $481k → 7%KATY ISD: $16k → 8%CONROE ISD: $12k → 9%DALLAS ISD: $48k → 14%JUDSON ISD: $14k → 16%LUBBOCK ISD: $21k → 17%CORPUS CHRISTI ISD: $10k → 17%HARLINGEN CISD: $15k → 23%MISSION CISD: $16k → 27%PLANO ISD: $10k → 5%FORT WORTH ISD: $12k → 11%UPLIFT EDUCATION: $14k → 14%CORPUS CHRISTI ISD: $10k → 17%LAREDO ISD: $10k → 21%HARLINGEN CISD: $13k → 23%PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD: $25k → 27%SHARYLAND ISD: $15k → 27%USOC ROBOTICS CLUB: $14k → 5%AUSTIN ISD: $26k → 10%UPLIFT EDUCATION: $10k → 14%SASTEMIC: $43k → 16%PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD: $21k → 27%AUSTIN ISD: $10k → 10%NORTH EAST ISD: $15k → 16%HOUSTON ISD: $34k → 16%MCALLEN ISD: $35k → 27%HOUSTON ISD: $20k → 16%MISSION ISD: $10k → 27%PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO ISD: $11k → 27%MESQUITE ISD: $10k → 14%MCALLEN ISD: $21k → 27%GARLAND ISD: $13k → 14%SAN ANTONIO ISD: $12k → 16%MCALLEN ISD: $16k → 27%HARLANDALE ISD: $10k → 16%TOMBALL ISD: $11k → 16%SAN ANTONIO ISD: $10k → 16%TOMBALL ISD: $10k → 16%LA JOYA ISD: $14k → 27%NORTHSIDE ISD: $14k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 32 repeat orgs$446k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2019, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
42

Total granted

$1.5M
$348k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+51%

Still filing today

13%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
EducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WE
    WESTLAKE & EANES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $41k · revenue +21%
  • UE
    UPLIFT EDUCATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $24k · revenue +75%
  • HP
    HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $23k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • S
    SASTEMIC
    one grant, 2017 · $43k · revenue -32%
  • LJ
    LA JOYA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
  • UR
    USOC ROBOTICS CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Robotics Alliance
—
2
The School for Global Thinkers

Our mission is to challenge and nurture young women to thrive in future global markets through personalized STEM advanced academics. Through a supportive small school and single-gender environment, project-based learning, and STEM advanced…

Education
3
Girls in Stem
Human Services
4
Kss Robotics

STEM Education Grades K - 12

Youth Development
5
Perrybotics

High school students learning to make robots

Youth Development
6
Best of Texas Robotics

BEST of Texas Robotics (BTR) will strive to positively impact education systems across Texas and the United States, encourage students into science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) careers, and return real value to our…

Education
7
Cinco Ranch High School Robotics Booster Club

The Organization's primary purpose is to assist and support student members in the design and construction of a robot each year which is built to the specifications of the F.I.R.S.T. Robotics Program. The students then compete with their…

Education
8
The Royal School System

The mission of Royal Public Schools is to spark students' natural curiosity and love of learning while providing the knowledge and skills they need to lead successful and fulfilling lives.

Education
9
Twhs Robotics Booster Club

To provide critical financial & logistical support for school's competitive UIL Robotics team

Education
10
Ignite Robotics

To increase student interest and involvement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) by engaging students in hands-on programs and competitions in robotics, programming, engineering, math, and other stem-related areas.

Education
11
Bloomfield Hills Robotics

Our mission is to inspire and support students in the stem fields by hosting and participating in community events, and providing opportunities for hands-on experience in designing, building, and programming robots. through mentorship,…

Education
12
Connecting Stem Kids With the Future Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Westlake & Eanes Science & Technology Association; the most unlike its peers is Front Line Youth in Science Engineering and Technology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST: $492,680 · OtherFIRSTDALLAS ISD: $98,725 · OtherDALLAS ISDMCALLEN ISD: $72,476 · OtherLEANDER ISD: $70,575 · Other+69 more: $1,003,581 · Other+69 moreSASTEMIC: $42,599 · EducationSASTEMICWESTLAKE & EANES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION: $41,025 · EducationWESTLAKE &…UPLIFT EDUCATION: $23,550 · EducationUPLIFT EDU…HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $23,155 · EducationHARMONY PU…Flower Mound HS Tech Boosters Inc: $13,725 · EducationFlower Mou…Viperbots Friends & Family Inc: $8,775 · EducationFront Line Youth in Science Engineering and Technology: $6,850 · EducationVERITAS ACADEMY: $6,000 · Education+2 more: $9,525 · Education+2 moreGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $13,150 · Youth DevelopmentATX ROBOTICS INC: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentDETROIT HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $9,967 · Community Improvement
Other$1,738,037Education$175,204Youth Development$21,150Community Improvement$9,967

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSASTEMIC: $42,599 over 1y, 12% of budgetWESTLAKE & EANES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION: $41,025 over 3y, 12% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $23,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $23,155 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFlower Mound HS Tech Boosters Inc: $13,725 over 1y, 18% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $13,150 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT HISPANIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $9,967 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKIPP Inc dba Knowledge is Power Program Inc: $6,525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Awty International School: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERITAS ACADEMY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDRIPPING SPRINGS HIGH SCHOOL ENGINEERING BOOSTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetVANGUARD ACADEMY INC: $4,525 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SASTEMIC ↗
  • Who funds WESTLAKE & EANES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Flower Mound HS Tech Boosters Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST)NH94.3× affinity66 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Round It Up America Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The George W Bush Foundation · Share Our Strength · I Car Education Foundation · Undies for Everyone · Justin J Watt Foundation Inc · San Antonio Food Bank

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Inspiration and Recognition of Science & Technology in T funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Inspiration and Recognition of Science & Technology in T. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Foundation for Inspiration and Recognition of Science & Technology in T’s filings →

    More from the funding graph