Loading…
· Public charity
Undies for Everyone
To provide children living in poverty or crisis with new underwear.
$1.9M
Granted FY2025
—
Grants
—
Communities
—
Largest
01What you fund
01beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
disaster relief
2021
underservedacthungerovermedicalcook children'schildren's health
2022
youth especiallynamresponsibleactteenssocial educationaleducational vocational
2023
modeleconomicdistrict homelessofficeeducation youthleafsexual
2025
wayneprgmfndnjobmanagementfriendship placestronger stronger
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
02FY2025
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
Grant detail is referenced in an attached schedule not included in the e-file. Total reported in the filing: $1,869,694.
$0
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Boys and Girls Clubs
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, caring and responsible community members.
Youth Development
2
Boys and Girls Club of Brazoria County
To provide educational and recreational development for youth in Brazoria County.
—
3
Boys & Girls Clubs of Deep East Texas
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
Youth Development
4
The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc
To enable youth to realize and develop their full potential as citizens in a global society.
—
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of Bandera County
Enable young people especially from disadvantaged circumstances to realize their full potential.
Recreation & Sports
6
Boys and Girls Clubs
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
Unclassified
7
Boys and Girls Clubs of Central Carolina
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
Youth Development
8
Boys & Girls Club
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
—
9
Boys and Girls Clubs of the Twin Cities
To enable all young people to reach their potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
Youth Development
10
Texans Care for Children Inc
Texas Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to life.
Crime & Legal
11
Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton and
Empower young people to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
Youth Development
12
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Texas Hill
To empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as responsible, caring and productive citizens.
Youth Development
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of San Antonio and the most unlike its peers is Convoy of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.8%1/134
the rest of the field
11%
206,163/1,819,431
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Round It Up America IncCA37.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Round It Up America Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Project Lead the Way Inc · For Inspiration and Recognition of · The George W Bush Foundation · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Good Sports Inc · Share Our Strength · Project Lead the Way Inc · Feed the Children Inc · Save the Music Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Undies for Everyone?
Find your warmest path to Undies for Everyone through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines