Skip to content
Foundation for Children With Intell Ectual & Developmental Disabilities at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Foundation for Children With Intell Ectual & Developmental Disabilities

Organized to promote the general welfare of intellectually and developmentally disabled individuals.

$853k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$265k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$2.3MScience & Tech$1.0MHuman Services$302kEducation$243kEmployment$230kRecreation & Sports$119kArts & Culture$83kCommunity Improvement$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $780,219, the rows itemized in this filing. The $852,793 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $72,574 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $271k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $227k
  • $250k+1 grant · $265k
$28,488
Median grant
6
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CIVITAN INTERNATIONAL$264,700
CIVITAN INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENT$176,579
OUR DREAM PURSUITS INC$50,000
CHILDREN'S ASSITIVE TECHNOLOGY$43,500
THE ARC PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY$35,869
FRIED CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF$32,976
LANGTON GREEN$30,500
OCCUPATIONAL SERVICES INC$28,488
THE ARC BALTIMORE INC$25,210
PARENT EDUCATIONAL ADVOCACY$22,960
THE ARC MONTGOMERY COUNTY$15,690
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$14,610
BELLO MACHRE INC$11,500
SHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSUEM$10,000
THE BLUE BEARS SPECIAL MEALS$9,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $623k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BERKSHIRE COUNTY ARC: $31k → 12%COMMUNITY RESIDENCE INC: $9k → 11%THE BLUE BEARS SPECIAL MEALS: $10k → 8%LANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICE: $11k → 6%ARC OF THE PIEDMONT: $30k → 8%CHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SER: $20k → 8%CHILDREN'S ASSITIVE TECHNOLOGY: $44k → 19%OUR DREAM PURSUITS INC: $50k → 6%RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION: $16k → 11%PENN-MAR HUMAN SERVICES: $16k → 11%THE ARC OF FRANKLIN-FULTON COUNTIES: $21k → 9%LANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SERVICES: $10k → 6%ARC OF THE PIEDMONT: $30k → 8%CHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY: $24k → 13%SPARC: $10k → 6%ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $29k → 8%RICHCROFT INC: $11k → 11%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $27k → 19%HARTWOOD FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%BELLO MACHRE INC: $12k → 6%THE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT: $30k → 8%LANGTON GREEN: $31k → 6%THE ARC OF BALTIMORE: $12k → 19%LANGTON GREEN INC: $16k → 6%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $20k → 11%THE ARC OF BALTIMORE: $11k → 19%FRIED CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF: $33k → 8%LANGTON GREEN: $16k → 6%BY THEIR SIDE INC: $5k → 19%LANGTON GREEN: $14k → 6%LANGTON GREEN: $9k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 17 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
41

Total granted

$4.0M
$930k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+24%

Still filing today

94%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $216k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S3
    SOAR 365
    2× · 2019–2024 · $130k · revenue +8%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $119k · revenue +43%
  • PO
    PROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $97k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • TW
    The William S Baer Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue +29% · 25% of their budget
  • SI
    ServiceSource Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $61k · revenue +25%
  • SC
    SPIRIT CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $41k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Social Change Inc

Our mission is to provide services of the highest quality for people with cognitive and developmental disabilities and related disorders including autism that optimize each individual's independence and capabilities, ensure…

International
2
Progress Unlimited Inc

To empower individuals to lead fulfilling and productive lives at home and in the community.

Human Services
3
Abilities Richmond Inc

Abilities richmond envisions a world where all individuals with developmental disabilities and other barriers will have the opportunity to participate in a full range of life activities. competitive employment in support of this vision.

Human Services
4
Diversified Services Inc

To provide training and independent living skills to individuals with development disabilities so they may become as self-reliant as possible and lead more meaningful lives in the community.

Employment
5
Worcester County Developmental Center Inc

Worcester county developmental center is committed to empoweringadults with developmental and physical disabilities to be productive,responsible, and participating members of the community byidentifying, enhancing, and creating…

Education
6
Spectrum Support Inc

To form relationships which support people to achieve their life goals in the areas of residential, employment, meaningful community engagement and personal services.

Employment
7
The Arc of the Capital Area

We empower central texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families through compassionate case management and innovative programs.

—
8
The Arc of Centre County Pa Inc

The arc of centre county embodies and protects the human rights of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and practices person-centered planning which actively supports their full inclusion and participation in the…

—
9
Lifeworks Incorporated

Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…

Human Services
10
Itineris Inc

Itineris provides opportunities for individuals with autism to participate meaningfully in all aspects of adult life. Programs include day programs, behavioral services, supported employment programs, community living and personal supports…

Education
11
Barc Developmental Services Inc

To serve and advocate for people with intellectual disabilities and autism.

—
12
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence of Maryland Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boy Scouts of America Natl Council 101 Northeast Georgia Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/58
Grantees still filing
36/58
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CIVITAN INTERNATIONAL: $1,948,388 · PhilanthropyCIVITAN INTERNATIONALThe William S Baer School: $125,000 · PhilanthropyThe William S Baer SchoolUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $1,198,208 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMSOAR 365: $129,506 · OtherSOAR 365+18 more: $412,936 · Other+18 moreTHE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $119,018 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF TH…CHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICE: $88,340 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S AS…LANGTON GREEN INC: $85,122 · Human ServicesLANGTON GREEN…OUR DREAM PURSUITS INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesOUR DREAM PUR…FRIED CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF POTENTIAL: $32,976 · Human ServicesBERKSHIRE COUNTY ARC INC: $30,900 · Human ServicesTHE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $26,500 · Human ServicesTHE ARC BALTIMORE INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF FRANKLIN & FULTON COUNTIES: $21,157 · Human Services+11 more: $147,002 · Human Services+11 morePROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC: $97,156 · EmploymentServiceSource Inc: $61,300 · EmploymentNW WORKS INC: $37,615 · EmploymentOCCUPATIONAL SERVICES INC: $28,488 · EmploymentWorkSource Enterprises: $27,286 · EmploymentKindness Cville: $20,696 · EmploymentSUNFLOWER BAKERY INC: $20,000 · EmploymentOPPORTUNITY BUILDERS INC: $13,957 · EmploymentVISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA: $65,717 · HealthSPIRIT CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $41,199 · HealthCLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER: $38,875 · HealthMERAKEY FOUNDATION: $30,859 · HealthL'Arche Frederick Maryland Inc: $21,000 · HealthMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $19,000 · HealthFAMILY RESOURCE INFORMATION & EDUCATION NETWORK: $15,699 · HealthPENN-MAR ORGANIZATION INC (MD): $15,000 · Health+3 more: $21,693 · HealthPARENT EDUCATIONAL ADVOCACY TRAINING CENTER: $60,160 · EducationTHE VISTA SCHOOL: $50,273 · EducationEBT FOUNDATION INC: $22,577 · Arts & CultureARTSTREAM INC: $22,257 · Arts & CultureSHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $15,582 · Arts & CultureMAGICAL EXPERIENCES ARTS COMPANY: $9,020 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$2,073,388Other$1,740,650Human Services$623,015Employment$306,498Health$269,042Education$110,433Arts & Culture$69,436

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCIVITAN INTERNATIONAL: $1,948,388 over 8y, 28% of budgetSOAR 365: $129,506 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe William S Baer School: $125,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $119,018 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC: $97,156 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICE: $88,340 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetLANGTON GREEN INC: $85,122 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA: $65,717 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetServiceSource Inc: $61,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARENT EDUCATIONAL ADVOCACY TRAINING CENTER: $60,160 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE ARC MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $51,978 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST PETERS ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC: $50,940 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTHE VISTA SCHOOL: $50,273 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSPIRIT CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $41,199 over 1y, 22% of budgetCLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER: $38,875 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNW WORKS INC: $37,615 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ARC OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY INC: $35,869 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIED CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF POTENTIAL: $32,976 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBERKSHIRE COUNTY ARC INC: $30,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERAKEY FOUNDATION: $30,859 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOCCUPATIONAL SERVICES INC: $28,488 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWorkSource Enterprises: $27,286 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHEALING STRIDES OF VIRGINIA: $26,916 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $26,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAccess Independence Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetEBT FOUNDATION INC: $22,577 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetARTSTREAM INC: $22,257 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE ARC BALTIMORE INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF FRANKLIN & FULTON COUNTIES: $21,157 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetL'Arche Frederick Maryland Inc: $21,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetKindness Cville: $20,696 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetLANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC: $20,400 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSUNFLOWER BAKERY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARTWOOD FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $19,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPENN-MAR ORGANIZATION INC (PA): $15,938 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE INFORMATION & EDUCATION NETWORK: $15,699 over 2y, 27% of budgetUNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON: $15,688 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $15,582 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetRED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC: $15,561 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Arc of Northern Virginia: $15,456 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPENN-MAR ORGANIZATION INC (MD): $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATL COUNCIL 101 NORTHEAST GEORGIA COUNCIL: $14,610 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITY BUILDERS INC: $13,957 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC: $13,536 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBELLO MACHRE INC: $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHCROFT INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kovar CorporationBaltimore Community F…Maryland Works IncThe Morris and Gwendo…The United Way of Cen…Arundel Community Dev…William S Abell Found…Community Foundation …SourceamericaThe Community Foundat…The Albertsons Compan…Nature Sacred
Kovar CorporationVA26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kovar Corporation · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Maryland Works Inc · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Arundel Community Development Services Inc · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · Sourceamerica · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Nature Sacred

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation for Children With Intell Ectual & Developmental Disabilities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation for Children With Intell Ectual & Developmental Disabilities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Berkshire County Arc Inc: 90% of income from government
  • Magical Experiences Arts Company: 16% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 10% of income from government
  • The Arc Baltimore Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation for Children With Intell Ectual & Developmental Disabilities’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home