Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Sourceamerica

Increase the employment of people with disabilities by building strong partnerships with the federal government and engaging a national network of nonprofit agencies and experts.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
274
Grants FY2025still arriving
49
States reached
$419k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Employment$16MHealth$5.9MHuman Services$2.9MPublic Safety & Disaster$143kYouth Development$128kCommunity Improvement$126kEducation$46kHousing & Shelter$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 274 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 274 grants below total $9,285,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,191,876 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,906,626 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k222 grants · $5.1M
  • $50k–250k47 grants · $3.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $825k
$21,904
Median grant
49
States reached
$191M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
READYONE INDUSTRIES INC$418,828
MOZAIC$406,432
NORTH BAY REHABILITATION SERVICES INC$188,386
DAWN ENTERPRISES INC$186,039
GOODWILL CONTRACT SERV HAWAII$122,075
PORTCO INC$105,776
VIA OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC$97,434
JOB OPTIONS INC$82,500
THE ARC CADDO-BOSSIER$82,038
PUEBLO DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRIES$81,782
CLINTON COUNTY CHAPTER NYSARC INC$80,248
SOUTHEASTERN KENTUCKY REHABINC$78,330
LANAKILA PACIFIC$73,381
SOAR 365$73,024
EMPLOYMENT HORIZONS$70,164
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $6.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BEACON GROUP SW INC: $80k → 15%DAWN ENTERPRISES INC: $186k → 12%VIA OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $97k → 11%ALLIED HEALTHCARE SERVICES: $46k → 13%GENESEE-LIVINGSTON-ORLEANS-WYOMING COUNTIES CHAPTER NYSARC INC: $50k → 10%NYSARC INC - MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHAPTER: $41k → 14%THE ARC JEFFERSON - ST LAWRENCE: $53k → 14%ACCESS SUPPORTS FOR LIVING INC: $50k → 14%CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY CHAPTER OF NYSARC INC: $36k → 18%TRESCO INC: $60k → 23%GLOBAL CONNECTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT INC: $61k → 16%NORTHERN TRANSITIONS INC: $46k → 13%PROGRESSIVE DIRECTIONS INC: $50k → 11%SUNSHINE SERVICES: $55k → 12%EMPLOYMENT SOURCE INC: $857k → 16%POWER WORKS INDUSTRIES INC: $63k → 18%KNOX COUNTY ASSOC FOR REMARKABLE CITIZENS INC: $71k → 15%ROLLING HILLS PROGRESS CTRINC: $67k → 13%THE ARC OF BERGEN AND PASSAIC COUNTIES INC: $50k → 7%LOUISE W EGGLESTON CENTER INC: $63k → 19%MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL CTR INC: $363k → 11%CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: $55k → 19%VIA OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $74k → 11%CDS MONARCH INC: $73k → 14%ARC JEFFERSON - ST LAWRENCE: $51k → 14%ACCESS SUPPORTS FOR LIVING INC: $50k → 14%GLOBAL CONNECTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT INC: $51k → 16%SERVICESOURCE NORTH CAROLINA: $165k → 16%KNOX COUNTY ASSOC FOR REMARKABLE CITIZENS INC: $68k → 15%ROLLING HILLS PROGRESS CTR INC: $66k → 13%LOUISE W EGGLESTON CENTER INC: $37k → 19%THE ARC CADDO-BOSSIER: $82k → 22%MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL CTR INC: $52k → 11%BEACON GROUP SW INC: $61k → 15%VIA OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $65k → 11%THE ARC JEFFERSON - ST LAWRENCE: $36k → 14%GLOBAL CONNECTIONS TO EMPLOYMENT INC: $48k → 16%THE ARC CADDO-BOSSIER: $67k → 22%BEACON GROUP SW INC: $57k → 15%BEACON GROUP SW INC: $55k → 15%LANAKILA PACIFIC: $125k → 9%PARC COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION: $50k → 6%LANAKILA PACIFIC: $73k → 9%PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVCS INC: $66k → 10%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SAN ANTONIO CONTRACT SERVICES: $46k → 16%AT WORK: $47k → 9%AT WORK: $39k → 9%ENDEAVORS UNLIMITED INC: $65k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$23M · 187 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

187 repeat relationships — 177 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 97 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

187
30

Total granted

$23M
$519k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+13%

Still filing today

96%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EmploymentHuman ServicesHealthEducationReligionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    Employment Source Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +31%
  • SI
    ServiceSource Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $814k · revenue +43%
  • GH
    GESHER HUMAN SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $805k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BERGEN-PASSAIC ARC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -44%
  • PC
    PARC Community Partnership Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -2%
  • SI
    SKILLS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Greater New York & Northern New Jersey Inc

Goodwill nynj empowers people with disabilities and other barriers to employment to gain independence through the power of work. goodwill nynj provided services to more than 11,087 adults in fiscal year 2025 through all programs.

Employment
2
Vocational Solutions of Henderson County Inc

Developmental and rehabilitation services for disabled individuals

—
3
Abilities At Work

To provide employment and alternative service programs for developmentally disabled adults in the portland metro area.

Employment
4
Able Industries

Training and placement of the developmentally disabled.

Employment
5
Crossroads Industries Inc

Provides work activity for the mentally and physically disabled.

Employment
6
Abilities Inc

Abilites Inc is a non-profit agency dedicated to facilitating integrated employment and full participation of persons with disabilities in their work and living communities. Employment is accomplished through direct service to youth and…

—
7
Diversified Services Inc

To provide training and independent living skills to individuals with development disabilities so they may become as self-reliant as possible and lead more meaningful lives in the community.

Employment
8
Workwell Industries Inc

To create jobs for individuals with disabilities, homeless individuals, refugees, and economically challenged individuals in an integrated industrialized environment.

Employment
9
Industrial Aid Inc

Sheltered workshop providing employment to developmentally disabled individuals.

Employment
10
Integrated Resources Institute

Training and education for rehabilitation field and job placement services for persons with disabilities

Employment
11
West Central Industries Inc

To provide employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities through rehabilitation and training.

Employment
12
East Shore Industries Inc

To assist to individuals with disabilities in obtaining their personal independence and employment goals.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Licking-Knox Goodwill Industries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Austin Task Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Senior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Lgbtq+ Community SupportAddiction Recovery ServicesCommunity FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%49%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%47%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%2/327
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,238

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

309 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 309 of the 314 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
306/309
Grantees still filing
200/309
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ServiceSource Inc — $814,036 · EmploymentServiceSource IncGESHER HUMAN SERVICES — $804,750 · EmploymentGESHER HUMAN SERVICESWORK INCORPORATED — $665,213 · EmploymentWORK INCORPORATEDREADYONE INDUSTRIES INC — $434,241 · Employment+96 more — $8,645,765 · Employment+96 morePioneer Adult Rehab Center — $1,252,500 · OtherPioneer Adult Rehab CenterMOZAIC CHAPTER NYSARC INC — $538,219 · OtherMOZAIC CHAPTER NYSARC INCSKOOKUM EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS DBA TESSERA — $347,761 · OtherSKOOKUM EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM…JOBONE — $242,325 · OtherHuman Resources Center of Edgar and — $224,675 · OtherTAC INDUSTRIES INC — $200,203 · Other+37 more — $3,143,265 · Other+37 moreEmployment Source Inc — $1,022,083 · Human ServicesEmployment Source IncMELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER INC — $415,154 · Human ServicesMELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAIN…BEACON GROUP INC — $265,243 · Human ServicesVia of the Lehigh Valley Inc — $257,504 · Human ServicesLANAKILA PACIFIC — $204,716 · Human ServicesGlobal Connections to Employment Inc — $199,907 · Human Services+40 more — $3,453,442 · Human Services+40 moreTRADEWINDS SERVICES INC — $348,409 · HealthSOUTHEASTERN KENTUCKY REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES INC — $163,622 · HealthEASTERSEALS CAPITAL REGION & EASTERN CONNECTICUT — $147,653 · HealthANTHONY WAYNE REHABILITATION CENTER FOR HANDICAPPED AND BLIND INC — $135,887 · HealthNETWORK ENTERPRISES INC — $50,588 · HealthCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC — $42,500 · HealthACHIEVE HUMAN SERVICES INC — $34,297 · HealthTRANSYLVANIA VOCATIONAL SERVICES IN — $110,268 · EducationASPIRO INC — $110,011 · EducationINSPIRITEC INC — $46,000 · EducationSOUTH TEXAS HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP — $42,428 · Housing & Shelter
Employment$11,364,005Other$5,948,948Human Services$5,818,049Health$922,956Education$266,279Housing & Shelter$42,428

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEmployment Source Inc — $1,022,083 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetServiceSource Inc — $814,036 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetGESHER HUMAN SERVICES — $804,750 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetWORK INCORPORATED — $665,213 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMOZAIC CHAPTER NYSARC INC — $538,219 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetREADYONE INDUSTRIES INC — $434,241 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER INC — $415,154 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTRADEWINDS SERVICES INC — $348,409 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSKOOKUM EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS DBA TESSERA — $347,761 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBREVARD ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC — $302,479 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPALMETTO GOODWILL SERVICES — $279,194 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBEACON GROUP INC — $265,243 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetVia of the Lehigh Valley Inc — $257,504 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetWIREGRASS REHAB CENTER INC — $247,416 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNOBIS WORKS INC — $246,674 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetJOBONE — $242,325 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetHuman Resources Center of Edgar and — $224,675 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetLANAKILA PACIFIC — $204,716 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTAC INDUSTRIES INC — $200,203 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetGlobal Connections to Employment Inc — $199,907 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH BAY REHABILITATION SERVICES INC — $198,386 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCOTTONWOOD INC — $197,943 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC — $195,293 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDSHIP INDUSTRIES INC — $188,826 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTHE DOUGLAS CENTER — $186,297 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetDAWN ENTERPRISES INC — $186,039 over 1y, 11% of budgetCW RESOURCES INC — $184,037 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTRI-DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF AIKEN COUNTY INC — $182,157 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNW WORKS INC — $178,931 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetACCESS SUPPORTS FOR LIVING INC — $178,289 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND TRAVERSE INDUSTRIES INC — $175,774 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSOAR 365 — $174,566 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKNOX COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR REMARKABLE CITIZENS INC — $173,329 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ARC JEFFERSON-ST LAWRENCE — $173,220 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARC CADDO-BOSSIER — $171,494 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMVW SERVICES INC — $166,878 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetNAVIGATIONS INCORPORATED — $166,723 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN KENTUCKY REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES INC — $163,622 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGARTEN SERVICES INC — $160,616 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSKILS'KIN — $159,839 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetACCESSABILITY INC — $157,624 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetDALE ROGERS TRAINING CENTER INC — $156,487 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetEASTERSEALS CAPITAL REGION & EASTERN CONNECTICUT — $147,653 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetPORTCO INC — $145,094 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC — $141,880 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetZOOM GROUP INC — $141,093 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetGOODWILL CONTRACT SERVICES HAWAII INC — $140,285 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOE ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED — $138,942 over 4y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Employment Source Inc ↗
  • Who funds ServiceSource Inc ↗
  • Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds WORK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MOZAIC CHAPTER NYSARC INC ↗
  • Who funds READYONE INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRADEWINDS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SKOOKUM EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS DBA TESSERA ↗
  • Who funds BREVARD ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PALMETTO GOODWILL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BEACON GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds Via of the Lehigh Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS REHAB CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NOBIS WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOBONE ↗
  • Who funds Human Resources Center of Edgar and ↗
  • Who funds LANAKILA PACIFIC ↗
  • Who funds TAC INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Connections to Employment Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH BAY REHABILITATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COTTONWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOUGLAS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DAWN ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds CW RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds TRI-DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF AIKEN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NW WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS SUPPORTS FOR LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND TRAVERSE INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOAR 365 ↗
  • Who funds KNOX COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR REMARKABLE CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC JEFFERSON-ST LAWRENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC CADDO-BOSSIER ↗
  • Who funds MVW SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVIGATIONS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN KENTUCKY REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GARTEN SERVICES INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Goodwill Industries I…Kovar CorporationEaster Seals IncFinger Lakes Performi…Foundation for Childr…Truist Foundation IncMaryland Works IncCare Design Ny LLCFrank Nigro Columbian…The Arc of the United…The National Restaura…The Albertsons Compan…
Goodwill Industries International IncMD35.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 4 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Goodwill Industries International Inc · Kovar Corporation · Easter Seals Inc · Finger Lakes Performing Provider System Inc · Foundation for Children With Intell Ectual & Developmental Disabilities · Truist Foundation Inc · Maryland Works Inc · Care Design Ny LLC · Frank Nigro Columbian Foundation Supporting People With Intellectual Disabi · The Arc of the United States · The National Restaurant Association Educational Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sourceamerica funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 60%
  • Sunrise Enterprises of Roseburginc — 99% of income from government
  • The Right 2 Work Corporation — 98% of income from government
  • Global Connections to Employment Inc — 96% of income from government
  • Sunshine Village Inc — 93% of income from government
  • Employment Horizons Inc — 90% of income from government
  • Great Plains Enterprises Inc — 82% of income from government
  • National Telecommuting Institute Inc — 81% of income from government
  • Dale Rogers Training Center Inc — 79% of income from government
  • Work Incorporated — 76% of income from government
  • Melwood Horticultural Training Center Inc — 73% of income from government
  • Easterseals Capital Region & Eastern Connecticut — 63% of income from government
  • Cw Resources Inc — 60% of income from government
  • Chimes District of Columbia Inc — 53% of income from government
  • Brevard Achievement Center Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Community Workshops Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Garten Services Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Hagerstown Goodwill Industries Inc — 31% of income from government
  • Challenge Enterprises of North Fl Inc — 28% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of South Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
  • North Jersey Friendship House Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Relay Resources — 9% of income from government
  • Sma Healthcare Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Golden Rule Industries of Musokee Inc — 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
13rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 314 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines