Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Foundation for Children With Intell Ectual & Developmental Disabilities

Organized to promote the general welfare of intellectually and developmentally disabled individuals.

$708k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$264k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Philanthropy$1.8MHuman Services$445kEmployment$278kHealth$261kEducation$87kArts & Culture$59kRecreation & Sports$14kOther$1.5M
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $661,568 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $707,764 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,196 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $173k
  • $250k+1 grant · $264k
$20,696
Median grant
5
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CIVITAN INTERNATIONAL$263,550
CIVITAN INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENT$101,324
SOAR365$71,268
SPIRIT CLUB FOUNDATION$41,199
HEALING STRIDES$26,916
EBT FOUNDATION INC$22,577
THE ARC OF FRANKLIN-FULTON COUNTIES$21,157
KINDNESS CVILLE$20,696
WHITE OAK SCHOOL$19,567
PROVIDENCE CENTER$15,690
RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION$15,561
CHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE$13,536
THE ENDEPENDENCE CENTER OF NORTHERN$10,000
SPARC$9,527
COMMUNITY RESIDENCE INC$9,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $445k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BERKSHIRE COUNTY ARC: $31k → 12%THE ARC OF FRANKLIN-FULTON COUNTIES: $21k → 9%COMMUNITY RESIDENCE INC: $9k → 11%LANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICE: $11k → 6%ARC OF THE PIEDMONT: $30k → 8%CHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SER: $20k → 8%RED WIGGLER FOUNDATION: $16k → 11%PENN-MAR HUMAN SERVICES: $16k → 11%LANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SERVICES: $10k → 6%ARC OF THE PIEDMONT: $30k → 8%CHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY: $24k → 13%SPARC: $10k → 6%ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $29k → 8%RICHCROFT INC: $11k → 11%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $27k → 19%HARTWOOD FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%LANGTON GREEN INC: $16k → 6%THE ARC OF BALTIMORE: $12k → 19%THE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT: $30k → 8%LANGTON GREEN: $16k → 6%THE ARC OF BALTIMORE: $11k → 19%LANGTON GREEN: $14k → 6%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $20k → 11%BY THEIR SIDE INC: $5k → 19%LANGTON GREEN: $9k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 14 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
33

Total granted

$3.4M
$800k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+26%

Still filing today

93%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentArts & CulturePhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S3
    SOAR 365
    2× · 2019–2024 · $130k · revenue +8%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $119k · revenue +43%
  • PO
    PROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $97k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • TW
    The William S Baer Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $125k · revenue +29% · 25% of their budget
  • SI
    ServiceSource Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $61k · revenue +25%
  • CE
    CLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $39k · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arc of the Capital Area

We empower central texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families through compassionate case management and innovative programs.

—
2
Center for Social Change Inc

Our mission is to provide services of the highest quality for people with cognitive and developmental disabilities and related disorders including autism that optimize each individual's independence and capabilities, ensure…

International
3
SpArc Services

To provide day programming services that will assist people to learn skills in order to live independently.

Employment
4
The Arc of Central Virginia

The organization serves persons who are intellectually or developmentally disabled, their families, and the community in planning district xi.

—
5
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
6
Worcester County Developmental Center Inc

Worcester county developmental center is committed to empoweringadults with developmental and physical disabilities to be productive,responsible, and participating members of the community byidentifying, enhancing, and creating…

Education
7
The Arc of Southern Maryland Inc

Create opportunities for independence and personal success for people with different abilities in inclusive communities.

—
8
Abilities Richmond Inc

Abilities richmond envisions a world where all individuals with developmental disabilities and other barriers will have the opportunity to participate in a full range of life activities. competitive employment in support of this vision.

Human Services
9
The Arc of Centre County Pa Inc

The arc of centre county embodies and protects the human rights of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and practices person-centered planning which actively supports their full inclusion and participation in the…

—
10
Lifeworks Incorporated

Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…

Human Services
11
The Arc of Lancaster County

Empowering people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) and their families to lead full, satisfying, independent lives of their choice.

Health
12
Greene Arc Inc

Provider of vocational, residential, day support, mental health and advocacy for individuals with disabilities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence of Maryland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Magical Experiences Arts Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsEquine Therapy ProgramsCommunity Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsYouth Development Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%64%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/58
the rest of the field
13%
4,907/38,574

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/50
Grantees still filing
34/50
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CIVITAN INTERNATIONAL — $1,683,688 · PhilanthropyCIVITAN INTERNATIONALThe William S Baer School — $125,000 · PhilanthropyThe William S Baer SchoolUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM — $1,021,629 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMSOAR 365 — $129,506 · OtherSOAR 365ST PETERS ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC — $50,940 · Other+13 more — $257,081 · Other+13 moreTHE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $119,018 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF …LANGTON GREEN INC — $54,622 · Human ServicesLANGTON GRE…CHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICE — $44,840 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S …BERKSHIRE COUNTY ARC INC — $30,900 · Human ServicesBERKSHIRE C…THE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $26,500 · Human ServicesTHE LEAGUE …THE ARC BALTIMORE INC — $22,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF FRANKLIN & FULTON COUNTIES — $21,157 · Human ServicesLANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $20,400 · Human ServicesASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesHARTWOOD FOUNDATION INC — $19,500 · Human ServicesPENN-MAR ORGANIZATION INC (PA) — $15,938 · Human ServicesRED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC — $15,561 · Human Services+4 more — $34,303 · Human Services+4 morePROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC — $97,156 · EmploymentServiceSource Inc — $61,300 · EmploymentNW WORKS INC — $37,615 · EmploymentWorkSource Enterprises — $27,286 · EmploymentKindness Cville — $20,696 · EmploymentSUNFLOWER BAKERY INC — $20,000 · EmploymentOPPORTUNITY BUILDERS INC — $13,957 · EmploymentVISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $65,717 · HealthSPIRIT CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $41,199 · HealthCLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER — $38,875 · HealthMERAKEY FOUNDATION — $30,859 · HealthL'Arche Frederick Maryland Inc — $21,000 · HealthMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $19,000 · HealthFAMILY RESOURCE INFORMATION & EDUCATION NETWORK — $15,699 · HealthPENN-MAR ORGANIZATION INC (MD) — $15,000 · Health+2 more — $13,856 · HealthTHE VISTA SCHOOL — $50,273 · EducationPARENT EDUCATIONAL ADVOCACY TRAINING CENTER — $37,200 · EducationEBT FOUNDATION INC — $22,577 · Arts & CultureARTSTREAM INC — $22,257 · Arts & CultureMAGICAL EXPERIENCES ARTS COMPANY — $9,020 · Arts & CultureSHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC — $5,582 · Arts & CultureCHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC — $13,536 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$1,808,688Other$1,459,156Human Services$444,739Employment$278,010Health$261,205Education$87,473Arts & Culture$59,436Recreation & Sports$13,536

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCIVITAN INTERNATIONAL — $1,683,688 over 7y, 28% of budgetSOAR 365 — $129,506 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe William S Baer School — $125,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $119,018 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC — $97,156 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetVISION RESOURCES OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA — $65,717 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetServiceSource Inc — $61,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANGTON GREEN INC — $54,622 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST PETERS ADULT LEARNING CENTER INC — $50,940 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTHE VISTA SCHOOL — $50,273 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICE — $44,840 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSPIRIT CLUB FOUNDATION INC — $41,199 over 1y, 22% of budgetCLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER — $38,875 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNW WORKS INC — $37,615 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPARENT EDUCATIONAL ADVOCACY TRAINING CENTER — $37,200 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE ARC MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC — $36,288 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERKSHIRE COUNTY ARC INC — $30,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERAKEY FOUNDATION — $30,859 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWorkSource Enterprises — $27,286 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHEALING STRIDES OF VIRGINIA — $26,916 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES — $26,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAccess Independence Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetEBT FOUNDATION INC — $22,577 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetARTSTREAM INC — $22,257 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE ARC BALTIMORE INC — $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF FRANKLIN & FULTON COUNTIES — $21,157 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetL'Arche Frederick Maryland Inc — $21,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetKindness Cville — $20,696 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetLANGLEY RESIDENTIAL SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $20,400 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNFLOWER BAKERY INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHARTWOOD FOUNDATION INC — $19,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $19,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPENN-MAR ORGANIZATION INC (PA) — $15,938 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE INFORMATION & EDUCATION NETWORK — $15,699 over 2y, 27% of budgetUNITED REHABILITATION SERVICES OF GREATER DAYTON — $15,688 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRED WIGGLER FOUNDATION INC — $15,561 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Arc of Northern Virginia — $15,456 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPENN-MAR ORGANIZATION INC (MD) — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY BUILDERS INC — $13,957 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHESAPEAKE REGION ACCESSIBLE BOATING INC — $13,536 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRICHCROFT INC — $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $10,475 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetSPECIALLY ADAPTED RESOURCE CLUBS — $9,527 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMAGICAL EXPERIENCES ARTS COMPANY — $9,020 over 1y, 17% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESIDENCES INC — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC — $5,582 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNIFIED COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC — $5,356 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kovar CorporationBaltimore Community F…Maryland Works IncThe Morris and Gwendo…The United Way of Cen…Arundel Community Dev…William S Abell Found…Community Foundation …SourceamericaThe Community Foundat…The Albertsons Compan…Nature Sacred
Kovar CorporationVA26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kovar Corporation · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Maryland Works Inc · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Arundel Community Development Services Inc · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · Sourceamerica · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Nature Sacred

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foundation for Children With Intell Ectual & Developmental Disabilities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Berkshire County Arc Inc — 90% of income from government
  • Magical Experiences Arts Company — 16% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
  • The Arc Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines