Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foundation For Advancing Technology And Community Giving

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$755k
Granted FY2018
48
Grants FY2018
9
States reached
$445k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$723kEducation$533kArts & Culture$149kReligion$133kInternational$113kSocial Science$60kPhilanthropy$55kScience & Tech$45kOther$0
02FY2018 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k41 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $109k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $151k
  • $250k+1 grant · $445k
$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Foundation for Learning and Develop$445,000
University of Iowa Hospitals and Cl$98,474
PEF Israel Endowmwnt Funds Inc$52,375
United Way$36,204
Cures Within Reach$29,584
Shed Aquarium Society$25,000
Iowa City Area Development$18,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
Habitat for Humanity$6,912
San Diego Habitat for Humanity$5,532
Grid Alternatives San Diego Inc$5,000
NCSY$3,600
Ronald McDonald House$2,852
ICPR Foundation$2,128
Wheelchair Ramp Accessibility Progr$1,940
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Red Cross: $20k → 14%Table to Table: $112 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$376k · 17 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
37

Total granted

$376k
$946k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+98%

Still filing today

35%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $519k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE IOWA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • TT
    THE TALKING FARM
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +68%
  • RH
    REUBEN H FLEET SCIENCE CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $376 · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • UO
    Univ of Iowa Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $360k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HALAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $219k · revenue +112%
  • UO
    University of Iowa
    one grant, 2017 · $71k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
2
International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology Inc

The organization provides peer reviewed scientific research and education in the field of biological dentistry.

Health
3
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
6
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
7
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
American Society for Microbiology

To promote and advance the microbial sciences

Science & Tech
10
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
11
California Ocean Science Trust

California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…

Environment
12
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Field Museum of Natural History; the most unlike its peers is Walder Operations Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
26/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Univ of Iowa Hospital Foundation: $360,000 · OtherUniv of Iowa Hospital FoundationUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Cl: $101,706 · OtherUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and ClUniversity of Iowa: $70,800 · OtherUniversity of IowaAmerican Committee for the Weizman: $60,000 · OtherAmerican Committee for the WeizmanUnited Way: $55,154 · OtherUnited WayTELSHE YESHIVA-CHICAGO RABBINICAL COLLEGE TELSHE-CHICAGO: $50,000 · OtherASSOCIATED TALMUD TORAHS OF CHICAGO: $50,000 · OtherCures Within Reach: $35,526 · Other+58 more: $183,806 · Other+58 moreWalder Operations Ltd: $445,000 · PhilanthropyWalder Operations LtdPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $97,375 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC+1 more: $64 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HALA: $219,024 · HealthAMERICAN FRI…+5 more: $1,428 · HealthFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $142,414 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $6,440 · Arts & CultureSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $25,000 · Animals+1 more: $64 · AnimalsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $112 · Human ServicesGLOUCESTER MARINE GENOMICS INSTITUTE INCORPORATED: $15,000 · Science & Tech
Other$966,992Philanthropy$542,439Health$220,452Arts & Culture$148,854Animals$25,064Human Services$20,112Science & Tech$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWalder Operations Ltd: $445,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $142,414 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $97,375 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOUCESTER MARINE GENOMICS INSTITUTE INCORPORATED: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAN DIEGO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,532 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE IOWA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $4,540 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Bay: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TALKING FARM: $2,295 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBUR OAK LAND TRUST: $1,824 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMarine Science Institute: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCEDAR RAPIDS MUSEUM OF ART: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACTLIFE: $916 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREUBEN H FLEET SCIENCE CENTER: $376 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMHIC: $286 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO CANYONLANDS INC: $284 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPELLA COMMUNITY AMBULANCE SERVICE: $192 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESTINATION IMAGINATION INC: $192 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMER OF THE ARTS: $192 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWKEYE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $128 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTABLE TO TABLE FOOD DISTRIBUTION NETWORK: $112 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $96 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $96 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $64 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN YOUTH RIVER WATCH: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Walder Operations Ltd ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HALA ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds GLOUCESTER MARINE GENOMICS INSTITUTE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE IOWA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Save The Bay ↗
  • Who funds THE TALKING FARM ↗
  • Who funds BUR OAK LAND TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GreenState Credit UnionIA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GreenState Credit Union · The Kenneth K Kinsey Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Johnson County · Walder Foundation · Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foundation For Advancing Technology And Community Giving funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foundation For Advancing Technology And Community Giving. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute Incorporated: 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foundation For Advancing Technology And Community Giving?

Find your warmest path to Foundation For Advancing Technology And Community Giving through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foundation For Advancing Technology And Community Giving’s filings →

More from the funding graph