Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Foster Family Foundation Ima Co Elizabeth

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Health$31kArts & Culture$22kPhilanthropy$17kEducation$17kReligion$14kAnimals$14kHousing & Shelter$8kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$638k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE REINS$2,500
FRANCISCAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY$2,400
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF$1,500
UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$500
CHILDREN'S WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$500
RIVERSIDE CEMETERY FOUNDATION$300
SKYLIGHT MUSIC THEATRE$250
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN$250
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM$225
SCHLITZ AUDUBON NATURE CENTER$150
CAMP MANITOWISH YMCA$100
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$100
HOBART AND WILLIAMS SMITH COLLEGE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%4 KIDS 2 KIDS: $3k → 10%PATHFINDERS: $250 → 17%PATHFINDERS: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
CA
MD
NC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$85k · 20 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
31

Total granted

$85k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+23%

Still filing today

60%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $3k · revenue +6%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +26%
  • RC
    RIVERSIDE CEMETERY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +159%

Funded once

  • LV
    LIFE VILLAGE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k · revenue -47%
  • K
    KAMPN
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • SC
    SMITH COLLEGE FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
2
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
3
Museum of Wisconsin Art Inc

The museum of wisconsin art celebrates the value, diversity, and uniqueness of the visual arts and artists of wisconsin. this is achieved by collecting, conserving, documenting, exhibiting, and promoting aesthetic understanding of the…

Arts & Culture
4
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

5
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

6
University Research Park Incorporated

The organization acquires, holds, administers, and distributes real and personal property for the benefit of the university of wisconsin (uw)-madison.

Education
7
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
8
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
9
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
10
Milwaukee Bar Association Inc

The mission of the milwaukee bar association is to be an inclusive, equitable and diverse organization that serves the interests of the lawyers, judges and the people of milwaukee county by working to promote the professional interests of…

11
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
12
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc and the most unlike its peers is Life Village Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionDomestic Violence Crisis Se…United Way FederationsPregnancy Support ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Cancer Support OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Ymca Community CentersIndependent K-8 SchoolsClassical Music EnsemblesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Developmental Disabilities …Community Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 58 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%57%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%66%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,533

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOSPICE TRANSITIONS LIFE CARE — $14,300 · OtherHOSPICE TRANSITIONS LIFE CAREZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF — $9,500 · OtherZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFLIFE VILLAGE INC — $8,000 · OtherLIFE VILLAGE INCFRANCISCAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY — $6,400 · OtherFRANCISCAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGYKAMPN — $6,000 · OtherKAMPNCHILDREN'S WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $5,500 · OtherCHILDREN'S WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONSMITH COLLEGE FUND — $5,000 · OtherSMITH COLLEGE FUNDOUR LADY OF LOURDES — $5,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF LOURDESST CHRISTOPHER EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $3,000 · Other+20 more — $16,520 · Other+20 moreUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED PERFORMIN…SKYLIGHT MUSIC THEATRE CORP — $3,850 · Arts & CultureSKYLIGHT MUSIC T…MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $3,600 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MU…MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHO…MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $2,900 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC…MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $1,500 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE REPERT…+1 more — $250 · Arts & CultureCamel 24 Fellowship Inc — $6,100 · HealthCamel 24 Fe…NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER — $4,000 · HealthNEIGHBORHOO…HOPE REINS — $2,500 · HealthHOPE REINSPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC — $2,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…RIVERSIDE CEMETERY FOUNDATION — $1,800 · PhilanthropyRIVERSIDE…AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $5,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $1,650 · EducationLAUREL SCHOOL — $1,000 · EducationDISCOVERY WORLD LTD — $860 · Education+1 more — $100 · EducationBESTFRIENDS PET ADOPTIONS — $2,200 · AnimalsNORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC — $2,000 · Animals+1 more — $100 · Animals4 KIDS 2 KIDS — $3,200 · Human ServicesPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC — $500 · Human Services
Other$79,220Arts & Culture$20,100Health$14,600Philanthropy$11,800Education$8,610Animals$4,300Human Services$3,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCamel 24 Fellowship Inc — $6,100 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKYLIGHT MUSIC THEATRE CORP — $3,850 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC — $3,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budget4 KIDS 2 KIDS — $3,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC — $2,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBESTFRIENDS PET ADOPTIONS — $2,200 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC — $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC — $1,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE CEMETERY FOUNDATION — $1,800 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $1,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAUREL SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN TREE GARDEN CLUB INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetDISCOVERY WORLD LTD — $860 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE HILL TROUPE LTD — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHHT FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHFINDERS MILWAUKEE INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE CORPORATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds LIFE VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds Camel 24 Fellowship Inc
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER
  • Who funds SKYLIGHT MUSIC THEATRE CORP
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds 4 KIDS 2 KIDS
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds HOPE REINS
  • Who funds BESTFRIENDS PET ADOPTIONS
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CAMP MANITO-WISH YMCA INC
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE CEMETERY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC
  • Who funds LAUREL SCHOOL
  • Who funds GREEN TREE GARDEN CLUB INC
  • Who funds DISCOVERY WORLD LTD
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds BLUE HILL TROUPE LTD
  • Who funds HHT FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Milwaukee Jewish Federation IncWI17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Anon Charitable Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Foster Family Foundation Ima Co Elizabeth funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Hht Foundation30% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Health Center9% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foster Family Foundation Ima Co Elizabeth?

Find your warmest path to Foster Family Foundation Ima Co Elizabeth through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph