Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fortune Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$131kEducation$72kYouth Development$62kInternational$46kReligion$26kArts & Culture$17kHealth$17kRecreation & Sports$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,259
Median grant
3
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLACK MEN COALITION OF DANE COUNTY$6,000
LATINO WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CENTER$5,000
CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTER$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
DROPS OF KINDNESS$4,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB DANE COUNTY$3,259
MADISON LAKEWAY PARTNERS$1,000
WISCONSIN YOUNG SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS$1,000
FOUNDATIONS FOR PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY$500
ROOT 2 RISE$500
NOTRE DAME COLLEGE PREP$500
UW FOUNDATION - WONDERS OF PHYSICS OUTREACH FUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FREE BIKES 4 KIDZ: $500 → 11%EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
IN
NJ
CA
CO
TN
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$205k · 11 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
19

Total granted

$205k
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+7%

Still filing today

64%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $50k · revenue +43%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +85%
  • WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP
    2× · 2017–2020 · $45k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • SF
    SARIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $125k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
2
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
3
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
Downtown Madison Inc

Make downtown madison an economically strong, equitable, inclusive, and vibrant place to live, work, and visit.

—
6
Milwaukee Water Commons Inc

Milwaukee water commons is helping catalyze milwaukee as a true model water city-a place where we all have a stake in the health of our waters and all share in their stewardship and benefits. we are advancing our community envisioned water…

Environment
7
Milwaukee Parks Foundation Inc

Engage our community in supporting milwaukee county parks to collectively steward a thriving park system.

Environment
8
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay Foundation Inc

The uw-green bay foundation furthers the mission of uw-green bay, a public university, by developing and increasing opportunities for students primarily in the areas other than those in which the state of wisconsin ordinarily makes…

Education
9
Madison Rotary Foundation

The mission of the madison rotary foundation is to work with the rotary club of madison to support its charitable activities, serve as a responsible steward of its resources, and ensure compliance with all regulations.

Community Improvement
10
Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Mcad provides a transformative education within a community of support for creative students of all backgrounds to work, collaborate, and lead with confidence in a dynamic, interconnected world.

Education
11
Madison Community Cooperative

Madison community cooperative's mission is to improve the madison community by providing low-cost, not-for-profit cooperative housing for very low to moderate income people and to be inclusive of underrepresented and marginalized groups.

Education
12
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Wisconsin Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Working Bikes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SARIS FOUNDATION: $125,000 · OtherSARIS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIMMACULATE HEART OF MARY PARISH: $19,748 · OtherIMMACULATE HEART OF MARY PARISHEDGEWOOD COLLEGE VISUAL & THEATRE ARTS CENTER: $12,900 · Other+27 more: $97,240 · Other+27 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $50,100 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationMADISON AREA T…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC: $49,984 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GI…WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $44,700 · Public Safety & DisasterWORLD BICY…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthThe Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy: $1,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyDOOR SHAKESPEARE INC: $3,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$304,888Education$60,100Youth Development$49,984Public Safety & Disaster$44,700Health$6,000Philanthropy$5,000Arts & Culture$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $50,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC: $49,984 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $44,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEDGEWOOD CAMPUS SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTHY MINDS INNOVATIONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOOR SHAKESPEARE INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMadison LakeWay Partners Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWorking Bikes: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMADISON PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗
  • Who funds MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD CAMPUS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY MINDS INNOVATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds DOOR SHAKESPEARE INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST MADISON COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Madison LakeWay Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy ↗
  • Who funds Working Bikes ↗
  • Who funds FREE BIKES 4 KIDZ MN ↗
  • Who funds MADISON PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John J Frautschi Family Foundation IncWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John J Frautschi Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Dane County Inc · Madison Gas and Electric Foundation Inc · Madison Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fortune Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fortune Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fortune Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph