Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Fortier Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$288kHuman Services$99kYouth Development$73kInternational$34kAnimals$28kHealth$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH$26,643
TIPPAH COUNTY GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER$5,000
RIPLEY ROTARY CLUB COATS FOR KIDS$3,000
ROWLAND WARD FOUNDATION$2,500
GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL$500
SIGNA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC$400
RIPLEY HIGH SCHOOL$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%THE BADDOUR CENTER: $2k → 19%TIPPAH COUNTY GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $5k → 16%TIPPAH COUNTY GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $5k → 16%TIPPAH COUNTY GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $5k → 16%TIPPAH COUNTY GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $4k → 16%TIPPAH COUNTY GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$527k · 17 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against -29% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
17

Total granted

$527k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-29%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $46k · revenue +6%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2019–2023 · $34k · revenue +151%
  • TC
    TIPPAH COUNTY GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • TC
    THE COLUMNS TIPPAH COUNTY INTERPRETIVE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -52%
  • AL
    ABUNDANT LIFE FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alcorn State University Foundation Inc

The foundation is a non-profit organzation that aids the university in promoting and cultural welfare, developing and expanding facilities, and facilitating studies, research, and other academic persuits.

Education
2
St Anthony Scholarship Foundation

Scholarships to be awarded at The University of Mississippi

Education
3
Our Mississippi Foundation
Community Improvement
4
St Andrews Episcopal Church Jackson
5
Baptist Memorial Hospital-Desoto Inc

Baptist memorial hospital-desoto, inc. provides quality medical health care regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, or age. its mission is to serve the community with respect to providing health care services and health…

Health
6
University of Southern Mississippi Research Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to oversee the acquisition of gifts, contributions and grants for sponsored research for individuals, industries, private organizations and government agencies and to assist with transferring technology…

Education
7
21ST Century Global Missions

The organization exists for the purpose of recruiting, educating, and encouraging communicators of the gospel to people across the globe in their native language, culture and country.

Education
8
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
9
The Salvation Army Trust Created By Thomas
Human Services
10
The General and Mrs Curtis E Lemay Foundation
11
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
12
Jackson Family Honor
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sigma Nu Educational Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Legion. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST METHODIST CHURCH — $145,843 · OtherFIRST METHODIST CHURCHFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $123,959 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHRIPLEY ROTARY CLUB COATS FOR KIDS — $60,500 · OtherRIPLEY ROTARY CLUB COATS FOR KIDSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL — $45,740 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCILNATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS — $17,182 · Other+22 more — $93,507 · Other+22 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $34,000 · ReligionTIPPAH COUNTY GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER INC — $21,500 · Human ServicesTHE BADDOUR CENTER INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesCONSERVATION FORCE INC — $20,000 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $16,700 · HealthTHE COLUMNS TIPPAH COUNTY INTERPRETIVE CENTER — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $2,500 · EducationSIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $400 · EducationENRICHMENT INC — $135 · Education
Other$486,731Religion$34,000Human Services$23,500Animals$20,000Health$16,700Arts & Culture$10,000Education$3,035

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL — $45,740 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $34,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTIPPAH COUNTY GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER INC — $21,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCONSERVATION FORCE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $16,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLUMNS TIPPAH COUNTY INTERPRETIVE CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BADDOUR CENTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION — $1,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetSIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENRICHMENT INC — $135 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA NATCHEZ TRACE COUNCIL
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds TIPPAH COUNTY GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds CONSERVATION FORCE INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds THE COLUMNS TIPPAH COUNTY INTERPRETIVE CENTER
  • Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE BADDOUR CENTER INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION
  • Who funds SIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ENRICHMENT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Brevard Family FoundationMS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Brevard Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fortier Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph