Skip to content

· Private foundation

Foreside Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$783k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$2.2MHealth$229kArts & Culture$52kPhilanthropy$51kFood & Nutrition$48kHousing & Shelter$37kEmployment$31kHuman Services$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $244k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BALL STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$500,000
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY$40,006
SPURWINK$40,000
STOCKTON UNIVERSITY$23,660
FARM TO SCHOOL OF PARK COUNTY$23,000
USM FOUNDATION$20,000
GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY$15,781
FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY$15,640
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$15,213
HRDC$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$13,360
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,640
Individual grant recipient$6,473
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAMP LAUGHING LOON: $500 → 9%LIVINGSTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MT
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
VA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 29 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
17

Total granted

$2.4M
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+42%

Still filing today

41%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Ball State University Foundation Inc
    6× · 2018–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +23%
  • SS
    Spurwink Services Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $121k · revenue +27%
  • UO
    University of Southern Maine Foundation
    4× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +27%
  • WS
    Wright State University Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +40%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FORT GORGES
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -82% · 49% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
3
Linfield University

Linfield university advances a vision of learning, life, and community that promotes intellectual challenge and creativity, values both theoretical and practical knowledge, engages thoughtful dialogue in a climate of mutual respect and…

Education
4
Indiana University Foundation

The Indiana University Foundation (IUF) maximizes private philanthropic support for Indiana University by fostering lifelong relationships with key stakeholders and providing advancement leadership and fundraising services for (Continued…

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Clarkson University

Clarkson university is an independent, nationally recognized technological university whose faculty of teacher-scholars aspires to offer superior instruction and engage in high-quality research and scholarship in engineering, business,…

Education
7
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
8
The Rockefeller University

The rockefeller university (the university) is a world renowned center for research and graduate education in the biomedical sciences, chemistry, bioinformatics, and physics. the university's 73 laboratories conduct both clinical and basic…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ball State University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Crush Athletics Limited. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Ball State University Foundation Inc: $1,730,000 · EducationBall State University Foundation IncFreehold Borough Educational Foundation Inc: $73,500 · Education+9 more: $197,180 · Education+9 moreSpurwink Services Inc: $121,000 · OtherSpurwink Services In…RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $75,648 · OtherRUTGERS UNIVERSITYHRDC: $45,000 · OtherHRDCUniversity of Michigan: $37,701 · OtherUniversity of Michig…STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $30,045 · OtherSTOCKTON UNIVERSITYBROOKDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $20,314 · OtherNORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherEQUALITY COMMUNITY CENTER: $20,000 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters of Southern ME: $18,000 · Other+25 more: $102,959 · Other+25 moreUniversity of Southern Maine Foundation: $70,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyPARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF FORT GORGES: $50,000 · Arts & CultureThe Shane Lalani Center for the Arts: $2,000 · Arts & CultureRURAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $10,000 · HealthALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · HealthGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5,500 · AnimalsLivingston Healthcare Foundation: $5,000 · Human ServicesCAMP LAUGHING LOON: $500 · Human ServicesCRUSH ATHLETICS LIMITED: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$2,000,680Other$490,667Philanthropy$155,000Arts & Culture$52,000Health$15,500Animals$5,500Human Services$5,500Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBall State University Foundation Inc: $1,730,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetSpurwink Services Inc: $121,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFreehold Borough Educational Foundation Inc: $73,500 over 4y, 54% of budgetUniversity of Southern Maine Foundation: $70,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWright State University Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF FORT GORGES: $50,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetFARM TO SCHOOL OF PARK COUNTY: $48,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $37,701 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetPARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Maine Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $24,019 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY: $23,521 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUALITY COMMUNITY CENTER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Southern ME: $18,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetFairleigh Dickinson University: $15,640 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRURAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLivingston Healthcare Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDAYTON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRUSH ATHLETICS LIMITED: $2,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetThe Shane Lalani Center for the Arts: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLiteracy Partners Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP LAUGHING LOON: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ball State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Spurwink Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Freehold Borough Educational Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Southern Maine Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Wright State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FORT GORGES ↗
  • Who funds FARM TO SCHOOL OF PARK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds PARK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Maine Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds EQUALITY COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southern ME ↗
  • Who funds Fairleigh Dickinson University ↗
  • Who funds RURAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ALS THERAPY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Livingston Healthcare Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DAYTON EARLY COLLEGE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Arthur M Blank Family FoundationGA15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Maine Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Dovana Foundation Inc · Park County Community Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Foreside Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Foreside Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Fairleigh Dickinson University: 2% of income from government
  • Georgian Court University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Foreside Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Foreside Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Foreside’s filings →

More from the funding graph