Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

For Our Future Action Fund

To mobilize and empower individuals and community-based organizations driving change and advancing the collective agenda of economic prosperity for workers and working families.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Public Benefit$3.3MCivil Rights$1.6MEmployment$390kCrime & Legal$266kCommunity Improvement$183kArts & Culture$70kEnvironment$65kPhilanthropy$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,010,048
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOR OUR FUTURE$2,010,048
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MI FAMILIA VOTA: $125k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP: $58k → 9%PENNSYLVANIA UNITED: $65k → 11%API PA: $25k → 22%TIDES ADVOCACY: $65k → 10%MAKE THE ROAD ACTION: $50k → 20%COLLECTIVE FUTURE: $25k → 14%FOR OUR FUTURE AF FLORIDA: $635k → 11%VOTAR ES PODER PAC: $75k → 13%EMGAGE ACTION INC: $50k → 16%MOTHERING JUSTICE ACTION FUND: $71k → 8%CLEAN WATER ACTION: $65k → 10%LIBERATION PACBLMMI: $40k → 16%MICHIGAN ACTION: $110k → 21%WISCONSIN HERITAGE INC: $35k → 7%LEADERS IGNITING TRANSFORMATION AF: $80k → 17%RURALVOTEORG: $100k → 15%THE COALITION OF LABOR UNION WOMEN: $145k → 17%OHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN: $25k → 19%ONE APIA NEVADA: $70k → 13%CASA IN ACTION PAC: $50k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP INC: $8k → 9%ONE PA: $50k → 11%WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION: $50k → 20%EQUAL GROUND ACTION FUND: $206k → 14%ALIANZA FOR PROGRESS: $38k → 13%PONTIAC POLICY ACTION FUND: $41k → 8%ACTION FOR LIBERATION: $65k → 21%WISCONSIN HERITAGE INC: $35k → 7%WISDOM ACTION NETWORK: $60k → 17%PROGRESSOHIOORG: $53k → 15%ONE APIA NEVADA: $20k → 13%PA UNITED: $15k → 11%FOR OUR FUTURE: $2.0M → 14%UNITED FOR PROGRESS: $113k → 13%LGBT DETROIT: $43k → 21%FORWARD JUSTICE: $810k → 15%WORKING AMERICA: $145k → 14%UNIDOS US ACTION FUND: $50k → 14%WORKING AMERICA: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
MI
NY
NV
OH
PA
CA
MD
AZ
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

13%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$745k · 6 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +904% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
27

Total granted

$745k
$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+904%
-16%

Still filing today

67%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’24
Civil RightsEmploymentInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WORKING AMERICA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $245k · revenue +305%
  • OA
    ONE APIA NEVADA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $90k · revenue ×18
  • PU
    Pennsylvania United
    2× · 2019–2020 · $80k · revenue +904%

Funded once

  • FJ
    FORWARD JUSTICE
    one grant, 2022 · $810k
  • FO
    FOR OUR FUTURE ACTION FUND PC
    one grant, 2020 · $635k
  • EG
    EQUAL GROUND ACTION FUND INC
    one grant, 2020 · $206k · revenue -99%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Progressive Workers Coalition

To ensure that working class people are educated on their voting rights. The coalition engages in mobilization and educational information sessions to ensure that all workers voices are heard.

—
2
Organize for Justice

Organize for justice develops diverse campaign leadership by passing on innovations and relationships from one generation of organizers to the next. the organization strives to create public support on issues affecting working americans.

—
3
Organizing for Action

Organizing for action (ofa) is a non-partisan, issue advocacy organization committed to growing the grassroots movement by training, educating, and activating civically engaged community members across the country. as a grassroots driven…

—
4
America Votes

The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.

Community Improvement
5
Ohio Womens Alliance Action Fund

The purpose of the Ohio Womens Alliance Action Fund is to build capacity for women, femmes, and gender-expansive folksparticularly Black womento determine the lives they want for themselves, their families, and their communities through…

—
6
Accion Politica Pcunista Dba Pcun

To promote civic participation.

Arts & Culture
7
Avanzamos Unidos

The mission of Avanzamos Unidos is to grow Latine political power in the state of Ohio. We are building a multi-class, multi-generational grassroots community organization that harnesses the collective political power of the Latinx/a/o/e…

—
8
Action Now

To fight for racial, economic and social justice for working families. The Organization works for affordable housing, stopping foreclosures, and predatory lending; access to quality health care and education; and living wage jobs. The…

—
9
Pa Alliance Action

The PA Alliance Action seeks to advocate at the state level for democracy reform through grassroots activities and support of like-minded organizations on behalf of and in support of all Pennsylvanians, in particular historically…

Civil Rights
10
Ohio Womens Alliance

The Ohio Womens Alliance is a statewide membership of grassroots leaders, organizers, community builders and activists creating a better Ohio for all through a reproductive justice lens.

Community Improvement
11
Pittsburgh United

Pittsburgh United, Inc. strives to advance social & economic justice in the

Community Improvement
12
Our Revolution

Organizing a progressive political movement powerful enough to make sure our government stands on the side of working people, not the wealthy few.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leaders Igniting Transformation Action Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Liberation Policy Action Cente. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Lgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesImmigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
10/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOR OUR FUTURE — $2,010,048 · OtherFOR OUR FUTUREFORWARD JUSTICE — $810,000 · OtherFORWARD JUSTICEFOR OUR FUTURE ACTION FUND PC — $634,641 · OtherFOR OUR FUTURE ACTION FUND PCWORKING AMERICA — $245,000 · OtherCASA IN ACTION PAC INC — $195,000 · Other+17 more — $1,048,013 · Other+17 moreEQUAL GROUND ACTION FUND INC — $205,860 · Civil RightsEQUAL GROUND …MI FAMILIA VOTA — $125,369 · Civil RightsMI FAMILIA VO…Pennsylvania United — $80,000 · Civil RightsPennsylvania …ACTION FOR LIBERATION — $65,000 · Civil RightsACTION FOR LI…WISDOM ACTION NETWORK INC — $60,000 · Civil RightsWISDOM ACTION…WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $50,000 · Civil RightsWORKING FAMIL…MAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC — $50,000 · Civil RightsMAKE THE ROAD…ORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 · Civil RightsORGANIZE PENN…THE OHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN — $25,000 · Civil RightsNE OHIO CHAPTER OF THE COALITION OF THE LABOR UNION WOMEN CLU — $145,120 · EmploymentONE APIA NEVADA — $90,000 · InternationalTIDES FOUNDATION — $65,000 · PhilanthropyPENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP INC — $65,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,942,702Civil Rights$711,229Employment$145,120International$90,000Philanthropy$65,000Community Improvement$65,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORKING AMERICA — $245,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEQUAL GROUND ACTION FUND INC — $205,860 over 1y, 23% of budgetNE OHIO CHAPTER OF THE COALITION OF THE LABOR UNION WOMEN CLU — $145,120 over 1y, 51% of budgetMI FAMILIA VOTA — $125,369 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetONE APIA NEVADA — $90,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetPennsylvania United — $80,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetLEADERS IGNITING TRANSFORMATION ACTION FUND INC — $80,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMOTHERING JUSTICE ACTION FUND — $71,480 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetACTION FOR LIBERATION — $65,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA STANDS UP INC — $65,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCLEAN WATER ACTION — $65,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWISDOM ACTION NETWORK INC — $60,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetProgressohio org — $52,500 over 1y, 61% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNIDOSUS ACTION FUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetEmgage Action Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetLGBT DETROIT MOBILIZATION — $43,333 over 1y, 29% of budgetLIBERATION POLICY ACTION CENTE — $40,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetAlianza For progress inc — $37,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE OHIO ORGANIZING CAMPAIGN — $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

America VotesSixteen Thirty FundAll Hands on Deck Net…Tides AdvocacyOpen Society Action F…Pro-Democracy CampaignTides FoundationCenter for Community …NEO Philanthropy Acti…Way to Win Action Fun…Clean and Prosperous …Future Forward USA Ac…
America VotesDC56.8× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: America Votes · Sixteen Thirty Fund · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Tides Advocacy · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Pro-Democracy Campaign · Tides Foundation · Center for Community Change Action · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Clean and Prosperous America · Future Forward USA Action

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization For Our Future Action Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home