Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Washington · Public charity

Food Resource Network

Increase people's ability to meet their own food needs.

$68k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
6
Organizations funded FY2020
50%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$8,318
Largest grant, FY2020
$24,777
Organizations funded a year
2 to 6
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
1

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 50% of the organizations Food Resource Network funded were first-time grantees, receiving 29% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
Human ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20206$68k50%
FY20192$30k50%
FY20182$36k0%
FY20173$43kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Food & Nutrition$152kHuman Services$19kPhilanthropy$7k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
West Seattle Food Bank$55,54340%
The Foodbank at St Marys$44,8602n/a
Archdiocese of Seattle$43,5942n/a
Society of St Vincent de Paul Council O$13,73420%
University District Service League$8,23510%
Grow$6,62611%
Immanuel Community Services$5,08411%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Food LifelineNorthwest Harvest EmmPuget Sound Energy Fo…Seattle FoundationUnited Way of King Co…Mightycause Charitabl…The Norcliffe Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for Good
Food LifelineWA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Food Lifeline · Northwest Harvest Emm · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Food Resource Network with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Food Resource Network?

Find your warmest path to Food Resource Network through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Food Resource Network

How much does Food Resource Network give?
Food Resource Network reported 6 grants totaling $68,295 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 6 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does Food Resource Network fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (86%), Human Services (11%), Philanthropy (4%).
Who are Food Resource Network's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: West Seattle Food Bank ($56k), The Foodbank at St Marys ($45k), Archdiocese of Seattle ($44k).
Does Food Resource Network fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Food Resource Network?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Food Lifeline, Northwest Harvest Emm, Puget Sound Energy Foundation.
Where is Food Resource Network based?
Food Resource Network is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $24k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Food Resource Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home