Skip to content

· Public charity

Food for the Poor Inc

Our mission is to link the church of the first world with the church of the third world in a manner that helps both the materially poor and the poor in spirit.

$346M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$1.3MHealth$660kReligion$536kPublic Safety & Disaster$272kFood & Nutrition$257kHuman Services$235kCommunity Improvement$150kPublic Benefit$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $270,567, the rows itemized in this filing. The $346,344,950 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $346,074,383 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $113k
$11,121
Median grant
7
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LITTLE ROSES$60,000
CATHOLIC CHARITES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC$52,501
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF PINE ISLAND$32,615
SEND RELIEF INC$25,000
IGLESIA BAUTISTA DE JESUCRISTO$19,965
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ACADIANA$14,423
FLORIDA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE-EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT$11,121
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE RALEIGH INC$9,943
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON$9,648
PINELLAS HOPE CATHOLIC CHARITIES$8,523
LIBERTY MOVEMENT MINISTRY INC$7,500
TEAM OF LIFE$7,500
SOMERS LIONS CLUB$6,300
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA$5,528
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $6k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON: $10k → 16%PINELLAS HOPE CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $9k → 12%TEAM OF LIFE: $10k → 13%TEAM OF LIFE: $10k → 13%TEAM OF LIFE: $8k → 13%TEAM OF LIFE: $8k → 13%TEAM OF LIFE: $8k → 13%Team of Life: $7k → 13%Team of Life: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
RI
CA
KY
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $345M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$335M · 97% · 60 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AID

South America$10.0M · 3% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AID

North America (Canada and Mexico)$484k · 0% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE AID

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 9 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
20

Total granted

$2.2M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
0%

Still filing today

44%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2017–2023 · $855k · revenue +115%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    2× · 2021–2022 · $617k · revenue +60%
  • TO
    TEAM OF LIFE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +39% · 47% of their budget

Funded once

  • MG
    MERCADO GLOBAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $295k · revenue +54%
  • FB
    Food Bank Council of Michigan Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $175k · revenue +320%
  • PC
    PROSPERITY CATALYST INC
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue -48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Church World Service Inc

Church world service, inc. is a private, voluntary faith-based organization with 37 member communions that transformscommunities around the globe through just and sustainable responses to hunger, poverty, displacement and disaster.

International
2
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
3
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of St Louis

To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence. our values are dignity, hospitality, service, excellence, compassion, and joy.

Human Services
4
Order of Malta Worldwide Relief Malteser International Americas

Mission:mia's mission is to protect the dignity and improve the health and well-being of suffering and displaced people in crisis situations throughout the americas, regardless of faith, political belief or origin. *continued on schedule o

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Catholic Health Services Inc

To provide health care and services to those in need; to minimize human suffering; to assist people to wholeness and to nurture an awareness of their relationship with god.

—
6
Catholic Charities Diocese of Charlotte

We are a christian ministry of charity, service and justice dedicated to providing help to those in need, hope to those in despair, and inspiration for others to follow.

Human Services
7
Medical Teams International

Medical teams international is a christian humanitarian relief agency focused on providing life-saving medical care for people in crisis.

International
8
Catholic Charities- Diocese of Tyler

Catholic charities-diocese of tyler is a servant of the body of christ engaged in works of mercy to ease suffering of the poor, the hungry, the naked, the sick, the homeless, the immigrant, the least amoung us, our brethren in east texas.…

Philanthropy
9
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach Inc

In living our faith, we create hope for people in need, without regard to religion. through our programs and ministries, we empower individuals, deliver social services and collaborate with others in building just and compassionate…

Human Services
10
The Salvation Army World Service Office

To support and strengthen the salvation army's efforts to work hand in hand with communities to improve the health, economic, and spiritual conditions of the poor throughout the world.

International
11
Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of baptist hospital of miami is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is a…

Health
12
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Galveston - Houston; the most unlike its peers is Chipola Rainbow Home Builders Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/28
Grantees still filing
15/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $854,909 · InternationalWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONALMERCADO GLOBAL INC: $294,515 · InternationalMERCADO GLOBAL INCPROSPERITY CATALYST INC: $149,764 · InternationalPROSPERITY CATALYST INCCODESPA AMERICA: $62,500 · International+2 more: $44,276 · InternationalOUR LITTLE ROSES FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY: $470,000 · OtherOUR LITTLE ROSES FOREIGN MISSION SOCIET…Food Bank Council of Michigan Inc: $175,000 · OtherFood Bank Council of Michigan IncSMA AMERICA: $117,000 · OtherSMA AMERICAPROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH OF THE CAPUCHIN ORDER INC: $75,000 · OtherPROVINCE OF ST JOSEPH OF THE CAPUCHIN O…LIBERTY MOVEMENT MINISTRY: $48,500 · OtherCARITAS DE PUERTO RICO: $40,920 · Other+16 more: $257,708 · Other+16 moreChildren's Hospital Corporation: $616,813 · HealthChildren's Hospital C…+1 more: $21,000 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC: $61,024 · Human ServicesTEAM OF LIFE INC: $56,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $9,648 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $5,528 · Human ServicesFLORIDA CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS INC: $32,768 · Public BenefitUniversity of Miami: $14,858 · Education
International$1,405,964Other$1,184,128Health$637,813Human Services$132,700Public Benefit$32,768Education$14,858

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $854,909 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $616,813 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCADO GLOBAL INC: $294,515 over 1y, 24% of budgetFood Bank Council of Michigan Inc: $175,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPROSPERITY CATALYST INC: $149,764 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetCODESPA AMERICA: $62,500 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC: $61,024 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTEAM OF LIFE INC: $56,500 over 7y, 47% of budgetFLORIDA CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS INC: $32,768 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $15,433 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $14,858 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON: $9,648 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMiami Children's Hospital Research Institute INC: $7,264 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA: $5,528 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds MERCADO GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Food Bank Council of Michigan Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROSPERITY CATALYST INC ↗
  • Who funds CODESPA AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds ADORER MISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds LUMINIS HEALTH DOCTORS COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IGLESIA BAUTISTA DEJESUCRISTO INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD11.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Good360 · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Food for the Poor Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Food for the Poor Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Food for the Poor Inc?

Find your warmest path to Food for the Poor Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Food for the Poor’s filings →

More from the funding graph