How much did FOOD FOR THE POOR INC grant in FY2024?

FOOD FOR THE POOR INC reported 14 grants totaling $346,344,950 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is FOOD FOR THE POOR INC based?

FOOD FOR THE POOR INC is based in FL.

FOOD FOR THE POOR INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

FOOD FOR THE POOR INC

To provide aid to improve the health, economic, social, and spiritual conditions of the poor.

$346M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$60k

Largest

01What you fund

0165% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$1.4MHealth$638kHuman Services$133kPublic Benefit$33kEducation$15kOther$1.2M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

clinicalbusinesstax-exemptluminis doctorsdoctors medicalresearch

2021

—

2022

—

2023

catholic diocese

2024

emergency relief

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k7 grants · $55k
$10k–50k5 grants · $103k
$50k–250k2 grants · $113k

$11,121

Median grant

States reached

$43M

Total assets

Largest grants

OUR LITTLE ROSES$60,000
CATHOLIC CHARITES DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG INC$52,501
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF PINE ISLAND$32,615
SEND RELIEF INC$25,000
IGLESIA BAUTISTA DE JESUCRISTO$19,965
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ACADIANA$14,423
FLORIDA CATHOLIC CONFERENCE-EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT$11,121
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE RALEIGH INC$9,943
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON$9,648
PINELLAS HOPE CATHOLIC CHARITIES$8,523
LIBERTY MOVEMENT MINISTRY INC$7,500
TEAM OF LIFE$7,500
SOMERS LIONS CLUB$6,300
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA$5,528

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.2M · 9 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.2M

$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%

+19%

Still filing today

44%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WM
Water Missions International
4× · 2017–2023 · $855k · revenue +32%
CH
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON
2× · 2021–2022 · $617k · revenue +57%
TO
Team of Life
7× · 2017–2024 · $57k · revenue +39% · 47% of their budget

Funded once

MG
MERCADO GLOBAL INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $295k · revenue +31%
FB
Food Bank Council of Michigangraduated
one grant, 2018 · $175k · revenue +456%
PC
PROSPERITY CATALYST
one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Catholic Charities Diocese of Charlotte

We are a christian ministry of charity, service and justice.

Human Services

Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida

Catholic charities carries out the social mission of the catholic church in northwest florida to serve, empower, and advocate for vulnerable families and individuals of any race, religion, or national origin.

—

Catholic Charities of

To provide service to people in need and to address social ills that undermind the dignity of the person. the ultimate goal of catholic charities is to create positive life changing opportunities for those in need without regard to color,…

—

Catholic Hospice Inc

Provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and miami-dade counties.

Human Services

Catholic Charities

Motivated by christ's love, we bring hope to life, especially for those most in need.

—

Catholic Charities Foundation of the

To solicit donations & maintain funds to further religious & charitable purposes for catholic charities of the diocese of palm beach.

—

Catholic Health Services Inc

To provide health care and services to those in need; to minimize human suffering; to assist people to wholeness and to nurture an awareness of their relationship with god.

—

Catholic Palliative Care Services Inc

Provides responsive end-of-life care to patients and families in broward and miami-dade counties.

—

Mother Frances Hospital - Jacksonville

To provide the community with a full range of comprehensive health care services without regard to race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age, or ability to pay.

Health

Catholic Charities of South Carolina

Informed and inspired through the mission of the Church, Catholic Charities of South Carolina promotes dignity, ministers to the spiritual and physical needs of those under our care, and acts to break the cycle of poverty in the Palmetto…

—

Christus St Vincent Medical Group

Charitable, scientific, educational & religious purposes of advancing, promoting & supporting the healthcare ministries of sponsoring congregation.

—

Adom Health Foundation Inc

The mission of adom health foundation, inc. is to provide compassionate and philanthropic support for the health care ministry of the congregation of the sisters of st. joseph of st. augustine, florida, to the uninsured and underserved in…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Dallas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Convoy of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/71

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,494

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/28

Grantees still filing

19/28

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

International$1,405,964Other$1,184,128Health$637,813Human Services$132,700Public Benefit$32,768Education$14,858

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation IncFL11.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable · Shell USA Company Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Good360 · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FOOD FOR THE POOR INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Team of Life.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 650979102 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Team of Life, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 47% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Food for the Poor Inc?

Find your warmest path to Food for the Poor Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FOOD FOR THE POOR INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Food for the Poor Inc?

More from the funding graph

FOOD FOR THE POOR INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Food for the Poor Inc?

More from the funding graph