Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Fond Du Lac Area Foundation

Creating a better community by promoting philanthropy, awarding effective grants, and providing leadership on important community issues today and forever.

$2.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
53
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$3.5MPublic Benefit$1.8MHuman Services$1.4MHealth$1.2MReligion$967kRecreation & Sports$592kArts & Culture$552kPhilanthropy$525kOther$0
02FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 53 grants below total $2,269,620 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,872,349 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $602,729 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k27 grants · $514k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$78M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FDL COUNTY$500,000
ST MARY'S SPRINGS ACADEMY$229,743
CITY OF BEAVER DAM$190,000
FDL YMCA$155,762
MCLEAN HOSPITAL$150,000
THE SALESIANUM TRUST$100,000
CITY OF WAUPUN$62,500
FDL COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$60,218
MORAINE PARK FOUNDATION$55,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF FDL$55,000
BLANDINE HOUSE$50,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$50,000
HOLY FAMILY$44,774
FDL SCHOOL DISTRICT$36,908
BEAVER DAM ROTARY CLUB$33,340
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $833k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DIVERSE OPTIONS: $25k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 11%BO'S HEAVENLY CLUBHOUSE: $13k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 11%PILLAR & VINE: $8k → 9%FDL YMCA: $156k → 9%FDL YMCA: $85k → 9%FDL YMCA: $58k → 9%FDL YMCA: $57k → 9%FDL YMCA: $49k → 9%FDL YMCA: $49k → 9%FDL YMCA: $41k → 9%FDL YMCA: $38k → 9%FDL AREA WOMEN'S FUND: $27k → 9%FDL AREA WOMEN'S FUND: $22k → 9%FDL AREA WOMEN'S FUND: $20k → 9%SOLUTIONS CENTER SHELTER & SUPPORT: $17k → 9%FDL AREA WOMEN'S FUND: $17k → 9%SOLUTIONS CENTER SHELTER & SUPPORT: $16k → 9%FDL AREA WOMEN'S FUND: $15k → 9%SOLUTIONS CENTER SHELTER & SUPPORT: $15k → 9%FDL AREA WOMEN'S FUND: $14k → 9%SOLUTIONS CENTER SHELTER & SUPPORT: $13k → 9%SOLUTIONS CENTER SHELTER & SUPPORT: $12k → 9%SOLUTIONS CENTER SHELTER & SUPPORT: $12k → 9%FDL AREA WOMEN'S FUND: $11k → 9%SOLUTIONS CENTER SHELTER & SUPPORT: $10k → 9%SOLUTIONS CENTER SHELTER & SUPPORT: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 64 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against -5% for the ones you funded once.

64 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

64
41

Total granted

$10M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-5%

Still filing today

67%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FOND DU LAC WI INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $532k · revenue +59%
  • MP
    MORAINE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $351k · revenue +131%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF FOND DU LAC INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $278k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • SD
    SCHOOL DISTRICT OF HORICON
    one grant, 2022 · $961k
  • CI
    CARE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2023 · $118k
  • HR
    HOLY REDEEMER CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST INC
    one grant, 2018 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fond Du Lac Lutheran Home Inc

Fond du lac lutheran home, as part of lutheran homes and health services, provides a christian-based innovative approach to aging through comprehensive services, programs, and communities.

2
Fund for Lake Michigan Inc

Lake Michigan is one of Wisconsin's greatest assets, and its water is critical to the state's future. The Fund for Lake Michigan is here to help sustain the Lake on behalf of the people and places that depend on it. Our goal is to have a…

Environment
3
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
4
Lake Area Free Clinic Inc

The lake area free clinic is the medical and dental home to low-income residents of waukesha county. the mission is to provide high-quality comprehensive health care to those in need.

Health
5
Lad Lake Inc

The mission of lad lake, inc. is to guide the growth of at-risk youth so that they reach their potential and live responsibly.

6
Door County Community Foundation Inc

To receive and administer charitable endowment funds, to award grants to social, educational, scientific, religious and other charitable organizations in door county, wisconsin.

Philanthropy
7
Fond Du Lac Festivals Inc

Direct, promote, and support festivals and special events that showcase fond du lac and the surrounding communities, and also provide assistance to other area charitable organizations.

Philanthropy
8
Destination Lake Winnebago Region Inc

Dlwr's mission is to market fond du lac, waupun, and the broader lake winnebago region as the ideal destination for a wide range of the traveling public's needs. dlwr will serve as the liaison between the traveler and our region's lodging…

9
United Way of Langlade County Inc

United Way uses its global reach and local presence to build stronger, more resilient communities where everyone can thrive. We work to improve the health, education, and economic mobility of every person in every community we serve.

Philanthropy
10
Wisconsin Association of Lakes Inc

The mission of the wisconsin association of lakes is to conserve, enhance, and restore wisconsin's 15,000 lakes to ensure their sustainability for the benefit and collective use and enjoyment for this and future generations.

Environment
11
Friends of Wisconsin State Parks Inc

To preserve, promote, protect, and enhance wisconsin state parks, forests, trails, and recreation areas.

Recreation & Sports
12
Fontenelle Forest

To provide a place where people can experience and enjoy the quiet wild of nature. we want to inspire current and future generations to care for the natural world.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fond Du Lac Area Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fond Du Lac County Agricultural Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries and Basic Ass…Community Mental Health & R…Wisconsin Policy Advocacy O…Youth & Community Leadershi…Community Health & Support …Medical Specialty SocietiesEarly Childhood Care CentersSenior Living CommunitiesYouth Development & Leaders…Private Social & Recreation…Reproductive Health Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%3%<5yr12%9%5–10yr17%15%10–20yr18%17%20–35yr15%25%35–55yr21%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%5%5–10yr17%14%10–20yr18%16%20–35yr15%21%35–55yr21%43%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.8% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/121
the rest of the field
12%
777/6,667

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
77/78
Grantees still filing
41/78
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST MARYS SPRINGS ACADEMY — $1,030,951 · OtherST MARYS SPRINGS ACADEMYSCHOOL DISTRICT OF HORICON — $960,553 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT OF HORICONFOND DU LAC DEPARTMENT OF SENIOR SERVICES — $705,770 · OtherFOND DU LAC DEPARTMENT OF SENIOR SERVICESFOND DU LAC SCHOOL DISTRICT — $604,367 · OtherFOND DU LAC SCHOOL DISTRICTCITY OF BEAVER DAM — $531,346 · OtherCITY OF BEAVER DAMHOLY FAMILY PARISH — $446,451 · OtherMORAINE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $350,726 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL- FOND DU LAC COUNTY — $328,518 · Other+84 more — $4,327,851 · Other+84 moreYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FOND DU LAC WI INC — $531,861 · Human ServicesFOND DU LAC AREA WOMEN'S FUND INC — $126,220 · Human ServicesSOLUTIONS CENTER INC — $104,967 · Human Services+4 more — $70,337 · Human ServicesMt Calvary Athletic Club Inc — $350,000 · PhilanthropyFOND DU LAC AREA UNITED WAY INC — $141,482 · Philanthropy+1 more — $9,050 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF FOND DU LAC INC — $278,486 · Arts & CultureTHELMA SADOFF CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $130,172 · Arts & CultureFOND DU LAC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $59,773 · Arts & CultureFDL CT INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureENVISION GREATER FOND DU LAC FOUNDATION INC — $104,842 · EducationMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC — $103,262 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $65,000 · EducationMarquette University — $55,700 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE BRANDON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $46,000 · EducationCENTRAL WISCONSIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $25,000 · EducationOptimist Club Foundation of Fond du Lac — $15,000 · Education+3 more — $24,100 · EducationFOND DU LAC HUMANE SOCIETY — $386,639 · AnimalsSANDI PAWS RESCUE INC — $27,500 · Animals+2 more — $10,680 · AnimalsCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC — $407,514 · Religion+1 more — $10,000 · Religion
Other$9,286,533Human Services$833,385Philanthropy$500,532Arts & Culture$488,431Education$438,904Animals$424,819Religion$417,514

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FOND DU LAC WI INC — $531,861 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC — $407,514 over 3y, 29% of budgetFOND DU LAC HUMANE SOCIETY — $386,639 over 8y, 15% of budgetMORAINE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $350,726 over 7y, 10% of budgetMt Calvary Athletic Club Inc — $350,000 over 4y, 60% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL- FOND DU LAC COUNTY — $328,518 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF FOND DU LAC INC — $278,486 over 7y, 12% of budgetAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $209,978 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FOND DU LAC INC — $201,122 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetMT CALVARY FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIARY INC — $186,543 over 3y, 48% of budgetFONDY FOOD PANTRY — $181,941 over 8y, 12% of budgetFOND DU LAC AREA UNITED WAY INC — $141,482 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF WOMEN IN RECOVERY INC — $138,500 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetTHE ARC FOND DU LAC INC — $137,302 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHELMA SADOFF CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $130,172 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetFOND DU LAC AREA WOMEN'S FUND INC — $126,220 over 7y, 25% of budgetFOND DU LAC ROTARY CLUB — $105,648 over 4y, 62% of budgetSOLUTIONS CENTER INC — $104,967 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetENVISION GREATER FOND DU LAC FOUNDATION INC — $104,842 over 3y, 13% of budgetMARIAN UNIVERSITY INC — $103,262 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBADGERLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC — $102,841 over 3y, 13% of budgetBROOKE INDUSTRIES INC — $100,922 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetBLUE LINE HOCKEY CLUB INCORPORATED — $75,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL ROTARY CLUB OF FOND DU LAC — $73,335 over 3y, 25% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOND DU LAC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $59,773 over 2y, 41% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FOND DU LAC COUNTY INC — $58,875 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetFOND DU LAC SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC — $57,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMarquette University — $55,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBlandine House Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF FDL COUNTY INC — $42,500 over 3y, 10.0% of budgetFOND DU LAC AREA FOUNDATION — $42,238 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $41,280 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAGNESIAN HEALTHCARE INC — $39,058 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALDO LEOPOLD FOUNDATION INC — $37,681 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSt Charles Cemetery Association — $30,859 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF FOND DU LAC COUNTY INC — $30,646 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF FOND DU LAC CO INC — $30,200 over 4y, 11% of budgetSANDI PAWS RESCUE INC — $27,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetFONDY YOUTH BASEBALL INC — $25,475 over 2y, 15% of budgetENVISION GREATER FOND DU LAC INC — $25,339 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,337 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL WISCONSIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDIVERSE OPTIONS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGOEBEL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $23,125 over 2y, 39% of budgetRAWHIDE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFDL CT INC — $20,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF FOND DU LAC WI INC
  • Who funds CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds FOND DU LAC HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds MORAINE PARK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Mt Calvary Athletic Club Inc
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL- FOND DU LAC COUNTY
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF FOND DU LAC INC
  • Who funds AGNESIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FOND DU LAC INC
  • Who funds MT CALVARY FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIARY INC
  • Who funds FONDY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds FOND DU LAC AREA UNITED WAY INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WOMEN IN RECOVERY INC
  • Who funds THE ARC FOND DU LAC INC
  • Who funds THELMA SADOFF CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds FOND DU LAC AREA WOMEN'S FUND INC
  • Who funds FOND DU LAC ROTARY CLUB
  • Who funds SOLUTIONS CENTER INC
  • Who funds ENVISION GREATER FOND DU LAC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MARIAN UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds BADGERLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC
  • Who funds BROOKE INDUSTRIES INC
  • Who funds BLUE LINE HOCKEY CLUB INCORPORATED
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ROTARY CLUB OF FOND DU LAC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mid-States Aluminum Foundation IncWI70.2× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mid-States Aluminum Foundation Inc · Grande Foundation · Mike Shannon Automotive Foundation Inc · Michels Family Foundation · Agnesian Healthcare Inc · Kevin and Connie Michels Family Foundation · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Jf Ahern Co Foundation · Fond Du Lac Area United Way Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Sadoff Family Foundation · Francis R & Ruth E Oberreich Foundation Corporation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Fond Du Lac Area Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph