· Private foundation
Foe #2224 Charity Fund Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k42 grants · $127k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MEDINA COUNTY | $15,000 |
| MEDINA CARES | $12,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,113 |
| NEWBRIDGE PLACE | $10,000 |
| MEDINA COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| INDEPENDENT ORDER OF ODD FELLOWS | $10,000 |
| MEDINA PERSONAL CARE PANTRY | $8,000 |
| FREE CLINIC OF MEDINA COUNTY | $6,200 |
| KELLI'S CRUSADE | $5,800 |
| MAJESTIC EQUINE CONNECTIONS INC | $5,500 |
| THE VILLAGE NETWORK | $5,000 |
| RUNNING2BWELL | $5,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS | $5,000 |
| CITY OF MEDINA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
33 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MEDINA COUNTY6× · 2018–2024 · $51k · revenue +19%
- FCFREE CLINIC OF MEDINA COUNTY8× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +18%
- NPNewbridge Place5× · 2018–2024 · $24k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- MCMedina County Law Enforcement Agencyone grant, 2023 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $8k
- WAWHISPERING ACRES FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARYone grant, 2023 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide a sober and safe living environment for individuals who are recovering from alcohol and/or drug addiction and who are making the transition from addiction to sobriety.
To promote the health and well-being of seniors in medina county so that none are left isolated or hungry.
Encourage and promote industrial, economic, commercial and civic development of the city of medina ohio. lessen the burdens of government, combat community deterioration, and rehabilitate existing community deterioration by purchasing and…
Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals is a Catholic organization that exists to provide medical and physical rehabilitation services to children and adults throughout the nation. We rehabilitate those who have sustained injuries or disabling…
Your independent community health system is dedicated to providing high quality, innovative and affordable healthcare for the well-being of our community.
Madison health's vision is to provide exceptional healthcare in a respectful, compassionate, and healing environment.
Spiritual help to the incarcerated
To prevent cruelty to, and the neglect of animals, enforce the application of laws, and distribute relative information to the general public.
To support medina county public safety officers and their departments who make medina county a safer community. the organization does this by providing financial assistance to: public safety officers (or their beneficiaries) who have…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Medina County and the most unlike its peers is Jafs Therapy in Motion Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 21. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF MEDINA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FREE CLINIC OF MEDINA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Newbridge Place ↗
- Who funds CUPS CAFE INC ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Independent Order of Odd Fellows 26 Morning Star Lodge ↗
- Who funds MEDINA COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION LLC ↗
- Who funds KELLI'S CRUSADE ↗
- Who funds MEDINA CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE EAGLES CHARITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Integrated Community Solutions Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds MAJESTIC EQUINE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING MEDINA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RUNNING2BWELL ↗
- Who funds CASSIDYS HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · Jackie & Bruce Davey Family Foundation · W Stephenson Fnd · The Westfield Insurance Foundation · The Giving Foundation Inc · The Clara Weiss Fund · Feckley Charitable Foundation · The Hillier Family Foundation · Ronald McDonald House Charities of Northeastern Ohio Inc · The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Foe #2224 Charity Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Foe #2224 Charity Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Foe #2224 Charity Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.