· Public charity
Flushing Council on Culture and the Arts
To present multi-disciplinary global arts that engage and educate the global communities of queens, new york and new york city, new york, in order to foster mutual appreciation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 25 grants below total $300,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $456,250 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $156,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $287k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRACTURED ATLAS INC | $30,000 |
| EDGEMERE FARM WORKS INC | $20,000 |
| NEW YORK LIVE ARTS | $20,000 |
| VIVARTA ARTS INC | $15,000 |
| SALVATORE LARUSSA DANCE COMPANY | $13,000 |
| POINT ZERO PRESS INC | $13,000 |
| CONCH SHELL PRODUCTIONS | $13,000 |
| DRUM - CENTRO CORONA | $13,000 |
| JACKSON HEIGHTS BEAUTIFICATION GROUP | $10,000 |
| RANDOM ACCESS MUSIC | $10,000 |
| KOFAGO INSTITUTE INC | $10,000 |
| THE FIELD | $10,000 |
| DANCING CLASSROOMS - PROJECT CONNCECT | $10,000 |
| TITAN PRODUCTIONS INC | $10,000 |
| THE MOTOR COMPANY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 25% of Flushing Council on Culture and the Arts’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $247k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NYNEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +56%
- JHJackson Heights Beautification Group3× · 2023–2025 · $26k · revenue +47%
- TPTHE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue 0%
Funded once
- CNCAMERA NEWS INCone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue -23%
- AIARTS INDONESIA INCone grant, 2024 · $13k
- HTHip to Hip Theatre Companyone grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cultural-educational, via multi-discipline arts hosting for the general public, and technical support for arts professionals.
A Contemporary Dance Company Based in New York City
New Dance Alliance is a performing arts nonprofit. Our mission, from the earliest days, has been to support experimental movement-based artists. In recent years, we have shifted our focus, making an explicit commitment to equity and…
The Tank is a small, Manhattan-based non-profit arts presenter and producer serving emerging artists. Our goal is to remove economic barriers from the creation of new work for artists launching their careers or experimenting within their…
Concerts and workshops in 18th century dance.
Presentation of Indian classical dance
Production of original theater at its Brooklyn, NY space.
Teaching theater arts
Torkomada is an arts-and-culture not-for-profit organization, promoting cross-cultural understanding through cultural diplomacy, folk and traditional dances, international education, lectures, foreign language pedagogy, and genocide…
Cultural and educational performances
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Queensboro Dance Festival Inc and the most unlike its peers is Titan Productions Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 10 years old; the field is 12. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 20% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK LIVE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Jackson Heights Beautification Group ↗
- Who funds THE PERFORMANCE ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds CAMERA NEWS INC ↗
- Who funds WOODSIDE ON THE MOVE INC ↗
- Who funds POINT ZERO PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds Salvatore LaRussa Dance Company Inc ↗
- Who funds ARTS INDONESIA INC ↗
- Who funds Hip to Hip Theatre Company ↗
- Who funds BLUE BUS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ASTORIA FILM FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR THEATER ACTING REPERTORY ↗
- Who funds ECLIPSES GROUP THEATER NEW YORK CORP ↗
- Who funds DRUM Desis Rising Up and Moving Inc ↗
- Who funds TEEN ART SALON INC ↗
- Who funds SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FLAMENCO LATINO ↗
- Who funds LOS HEREDEROS INC ↗
- Who funds MARE NOSTRUM ELEMENTS INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKAWAY FILM FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds Dancing Classrooms Inc ↗
- Who funds LIBERARTE INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Traditional Music and Dance Inc ↗
- Who funds AIM INNOVATION INC ↗
- Who funds PERCUSSIA ↗
- Who funds LARU BEYA COLLECTIVE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds QUEENSBORO DANCE FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds JIVA PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds RANDOM ACCESS MUSIC LTD ↗
- Who funds TITAN PRODUCTIONS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS ART FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds GUYANESE GIRLS ROCK FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dance Service New York City Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · New Music USA Inc · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Flushing Council on Culture and the Arts funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.