Skip to content

· Public charity

Florida Certified Organic Growers and Consumers Inc

Florida certified organic growers and consumers, inc.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$202k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.9MEnvironment$446kScience & Tech$410kCommunity Improvement$132kPublic Safety & Disaster$79kPhilanthropy$62kEducation$34kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $511k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.1M
$47,750
Median grant
12
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOC$202,050
GEORGIA ORGANICS$172,681
ALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE$109,625
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY$95,080
LSU AGRICULTURAL CENTER$88,443
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL TECH$82,125
MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY$78,100
RONDALE INSTITUTE$71,969
INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC$68,930
CENTRAL LOUISIANA ECONOMIC$57,661
SPROUT NOLA$52,415
ASU SWETTE CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE$50,000
VIRGIN ISLANDS FARMERS ALLIANCE$49,150
BLACK FARMERS INDEX$47,750
ORGANIC GROWERS SCHOOL INC$47,608
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CLARA WHITE MISSION INC: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
PA
CT
CA
AZ
NC
SC
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 39 repeat orgs$251k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
10

Total granted

$4.5M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-21%

Still filing today

49%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEnvironmentEducationCommunity ImprovementPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $674k · revenue +23%
  • AS
    ALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE NETWORK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $254k · revenue +65% · 43% of their budget
  • IS
    INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $187k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • WW
    WHOLESOME WAVE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $86k · revenue -66%
  • UO
    URBAN OASIS PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $34k · revenue +212%
  • CR
    CITRUS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $24k · revenue -77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Growers
—
2
Black Urban Farmers Association
Food & Nutrition
3
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Jersey Inc

NOFA-NJ is an Association of consumers, farmers and gardeners, creating a regionally based organic agricultural system which is economically viable. The corporation's goals are the following:- Increase the number of certified organic farms…

—
4
Florida Certified Organic Growers and Consumers Inc

Florida certified organic growers and consumers, inc. (fog) supports and promotes organic, regenerative, and sustainable agriculture.

Food & Nutrition
5
Local Food Network

To increase the consumption of and production of organically grown produce in our local region by supporting farms via events and markets where they can connect with new customers. additionally create and participate in educational…

Food & Nutrition
6
Solutions From the Land

To indentify and facilitate the implementation of integrated polices, practices and projects at a landscape scale that will result in land being sustainably managed to produce food, feed, fiber, and energy while enhancing biodiversity and…

Environment
7
Organic Growers Research and Information Sharing N

To facilitate the developement of sustainable food systems by helping groweres to increase their knowledge of agro-ecosystems management and utilization of local and regional marketing strategies.

Food & Nutrition
8
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
9
Organic Association of Kentucky

To improve the health of the environment and communities by advancing organic regenerative agriculture to grow ecological resilience, economic viability and socially just futures for kentucky farmers through educational, technical and…

Food & Nutrition
10
Citizens for a Sustainable Future

Citizens for a Sustainable Future is a Tallahassee-based organization that raises awareness within African American communities about cultural, economic and environmental sustainability and serves as a conduit for further civic action and…

Community Improvement
11
Forage Inc

To cultivate and sustain a resilient local food community in North Central Florida through collaboration, economic opportunity, education, and seed stewardship. From seed to plate, we are growing a robust local food system!

Food & Nutrition
12
Organic Farmers Association

The mission of the Organic Farmers Association is to provide a strong and unified national voice for domestic certified organic producers so that organic agriculture will become the basis of a viable United States food and agricultural…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carolina Farm Stewardship Association; the most unlike its peers is University of Puerto Rico Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION: $673,550 · OtherCAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATIONNC STATE UNIVERSITY: $256,345 · OtherNC STATE UNIVERSITYLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $232,422 · OtherLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITYMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY: $140,199 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITYGEORGIA ORGANIC PEANUT ASSOC: $134,595 · OtherGEORGIA ORGANIC PEANUT ASSOCCLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $119,185 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA A & T STATE UNIVERSITY: $113,125 · OtherVIRGIN ISLANDS FARMERS ALLIANCE: $112,500 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $85,000 · OtherCentral Carolina Community College: $81,008 · Other+23 more: $441,876 · Other+23 moreALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE NETWORK: $254,325 · Food & NutritionALABAMA SUSTAINABL…Rodale Institute: $159,415 · Food & NutritionRodale InstituteSPROUT NOLA: $131,210 · Food & NutritionSPROUT NOLABLACK FARMERS INDEX: $127,250 · Food & NutritionBLACK FARMERS INDE…GLOBAL GROWERS NETWORK INC: $81,643 · Food & NutritionGLOBAL GROWERS NET…DIG LOCAL NETWORK INC: $27,633 · Food & NutritionGEORGIA ORGANICS INC: $487,119 · EnvironmentGEORGIA ORGANICS I…NATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY: $144,105 · EnvironmentNATIONAL CENTER FO…WHOLESOME WAVE INC: $85,800 · EnvironmentWHOLESOME WAVE INCURBAN OASIS PROJECT INC: $34,090 · EnvironmentINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $186,669 · Community ImprovementMARKETUMBRELLAORG: $112,496 · Community ImprovementST PETERSBURG SATURDAY MORNING MARKET INC: $31,541 · Community ImprovementOrganic Growers School Inc: $133,442 · EducationUniversity of Puerto Rico Foundation Inc: $83,575 · EducationTuskegee University: $16,500 · Education+1 more: $5,600 · EducationCENTRAL LOUISIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE: $150,807 · Public Safety & DisasterRURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INTERNATION: $65,920 · International
Other$2,389,805Food & Nutrition$781,476Environment$751,114Community Improvement$330,706Education$239,117Public Safety & Disaster$150,807International$65,920

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION: $673,550 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetGEORGIA ORGANICS INC: $487,119 over 3y, 14% of budgetALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE NETWORK: $254,325 over 3y, 43% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $186,669 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRodale Institute: $159,415 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL LOUISIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE: $150,807 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY: $144,105 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetOrganic Growers School Inc: $133,442 over 3y, 10% of budgetSPROUT NOLA: $131,210 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetBLACK FARMERS INDEX: $127,250 over 3y, 17% of budgetMARKETUMBRELLAORG: $112,496 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWHOLESOME WAVE INC: $85,800 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUniversity of Puerto Rico Foundation Inc: $83,575 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetGLOBAL GROWERS NETWORK INC: $81,643 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetRURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INTERNATION: $65,920 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF SARASOTA COUNTY PARKS INC: $37,495 over 2y, 11% of budgetURBAN OASIS PROJECT INC: $34,090 over 1y, 13% of budgetTuskegee University: $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSweetwater Organic Community Farm Inc: $10,735 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetNORTH FLORIDA SCHOOL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION INC: $10,731 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLARA WHITE MISSION INC: $8,087 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF CAPE CORAL: $6,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetREALIZE BRADENTON INC: $5,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFrenchtown Neighborhood Improvement Association: $5,600 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAROLINA FARM STEWARDSHIP ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA ORGANICS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds INQUIRING SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Rodale Institute ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL LOUISIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Organic Growers School Inc ↗
  • Who funds SPROUT NOLA ↗
  • Who funds BLACK FARMERS INDEX ↗
  • Who funds MARKETUMBRELLAORG ↗
  • Who funds WHOLESOME WAVE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Puerto Rico Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GROWERS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INTERNATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF SARASOTA COUNTY PARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN OASIS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST PETERSBURG SATURDAY MORNING MARKET INC ↗
  • Who funds DIG LOCAL NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CITRUS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHREVEPORT GREEN ↗
  • Who funds Tuskegee University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Farm Aid IncMA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Farm Aid Inc · UNFI Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Schmidt Family Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Florida Certified Organic Growers and Consumers Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Florida Certified Organic Growers and Consumers Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Urban Oasis Project Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Clara White Mission Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Florida Certified Organic Growers and Consumers Inc?

Find your warmest path to Florida Certified Organic Growers and Consumers Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Florida Certified Organic Growers and Consumers’ filings →

More from the funding graph