Skip to content
Flora Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Flora Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
200
Grants FY2024still arriving
22
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$5.1MInternational$3.2MPhilanthropy$2.2MEducation$2.1MCivil Rights$1.3MHealth$1.3MArts & Culture$1.2MFood & Nutrition$996kOther$0
02FY2024 · 200 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k43 grants · $158k
  • $10k–50k125 grants · $2.6M
  • $50k–250k32 grants · $2.2M
$20,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$128M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$125,000
ASIAN PEOPLES MOVEMENT INFACT$125,000
GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND$107,000
POWER FOR ALL$100,000
ENERGY PEACE PARTNERS$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
TIDES FOUNDATIONPOWER SHIFT AFRICA$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
PRIVATE EQUITY STAKEHOLDER PROJECT$100,000
CORAL REEF ALLIANCE$70,000
Individual grant recipient$67,500
TIDES FOUNDATIONMARKET FORCES$65,000
CISAC STANFORD UNIVERSITY$60,000
SEACOLOGY$60,000
HAITI ADOLESCENT GIRLS FOS FEMINIST$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPI FOUNDATION: $123k → 26%FOR THE VILLAGE: $10k → 11%LITTL ESSENTIALS: $5k → 20%PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE: $30k → 10%WE OWN IT: $120k → 10%CENTER FOR RURAL STATEGIES: $40k → 29%HOPI FOUNDATION: $65k → 26%HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONAL: $90k → 8%FOR THE VILLAGE: $10k → 11%PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE: $30k → 10%HOPI FOUNDATION: $58k → 26%PARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE: $25k → 10%HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONAL: $75k → 8%HEALTH EQUITY INTERNATIONAL: $45k → 8%HOPI TUTSKWA PERMACULTURE INSTITUTE: $30k → 26%NEW CREATION HOME MINISTGRIES: $20k → 8%HEALTH EQUITY INTL: $25k → 8%NEW CREATION HOME MINISTGRIES: $20k → 8%NEW CREATION HOME MINISTRIES: $20k → 8%NEW CREATION HOME MINISTGRIES: $20k → 8%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES: $15k → 14%HOPI FOUNDATION: $10k → 26%NEW CREATION HOME MINISTRIES: $20k → 8%IMAGINE LA: $13k → 14%IMAGINE LA: $13k → 14%INVISIBLE PEOPLE: $10k → 14%YMCA SILICON VALLEY: $3k → 8%YMCA SILICON VALLEY: $2k → 8%WESTWIND RIDING INSTITUTE: $5k → 8%AUTISM CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $23k → 10%WESTWIND RIDING INSTITUTE: $3k → 8%AUTISM CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $23k → 10%WESTWIND RIDING INSTITUTE: $2k → 8%SIDEWALK PROJECT: $15k → 14%GUGULETHU BALLET PROJECT: $10k → 7%WESTWIND RIDING INSTITUE: $2k → 8%SIDEWALK PROJECT: $15k → 14%GUGULETHU BALLET PROJECT: $7k → 7%BRAVER ANGELS: $15k → 17%GUGULETHU BALLET PROJECT: $5k → 7%GUGULETHU BALLET PROJECT: $4k → 7%LAUNDRY TRUCK LA: $15k → 14%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICE: $2k → 10%LAUNDRY TRUCK LA: $5k → 14%WOMEN IN NEED: $5k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $28k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 186 repeat orgs$5.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

186 repeat relationships: 104 still active in FY2024, 82 since wound down; 60 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

186
188

Total granted

$17M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+28%

Still filing today

58%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Society
    5× · 2020–2024 · $323k · revenue +57%
  • CL
    CHANGE LABS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $320k · revenue +103%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $310k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • CP
    COLORADO PLATEAU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $125k · revenue -53%
  • WO
    WE OWN IT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $120k · revenue -30%
  • CA
    CLIMATE AND HEALTH RESEARCH NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -45% · 36% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
8
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
9
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
10
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
11
Nuru International

Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…

International
12
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Laundry Truck La. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

223 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 223 of the 455 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
220/223
Grantees still filing
144/223
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherASIAN PEOPLES MOVEMENT INFACT: $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $448,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $430,500 · Other+125 more: $10,968,000 · Other+125 moreGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $532,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGR…Energy Peace Partners: $435,000 · EnvironmentEnergy Peace P…THE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE: $280,000 · EnvironmentTHE CORAL REEF…ECOAMERICA: $255,000 · EnvironmentECOAMERICAURBAN FOREST CARBON REGISTRY: $245,000 · EnvironmentURBAN FOREST C…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $145,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC: $142,000 · Environment+13 more: $772,500 · Environment+13 morePower for All: $400,000 · InternationalPower for A…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $243,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JE…Groundswell International Inc: $169,000 · InternationalGroundswell…INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $158,400 · InternationalINTERNATION…BEYOND BORDERS INC: $147,500 · InternationalBEYOND BORD…THE KILGORIS PROJECT: $142,500 · InternationalTHE KILGORI…PROSPERITY CATALYST INC: $136,500 · InternationalPROSPERITY …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $132,150 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…SHINE ON FKA SHINE ON SIERRA LEONE: $107,500 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $100,000 · InternationalREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $80,000 · International+10 more: $500,800 · International+10 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $705,000 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITY: $365,000 · Community ImprovementCHANGE LABS: $320,000 · Community ImprovementTOLANI LAKE ENTERPRISES INC: $170,000 · Community ImprovementLA COCINA: $150,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $50,000 · Community ImprovementTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $213,684 · EducationTO NIZHONI ANI: $160,000 · EducationNACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK: $135,000 · EducationCOLORADO PLATEAU FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationRICHMOND PROMISE INC: $95,000 · EducationUrban Ed Academy: $85,000 · EducationNew York University: $85,000 · EducationBRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL: $67,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $62,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACK: $50,000 · EducationTHE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMI'NANGWTUKWSIWMANI: $255,000 · Human ServicesST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC: $235,000 · Human ServicesWE OWN IT INC: $120,000 · Human ServicesNew Creation Home Ministries: $100,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesAUTISM CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $45,000 · Human ServicesImagine Los Angeles Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $270,000 · PhilanthropyBoston Foundation Inc: $200,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $102,500 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $60,000 · PhilanthropyBUILDING PEACEFUL BRIDGES: $35,000 · Philanthropy
Other$12,847,000Environment$2,806,500International$2,317,350Community Improvement$1,760,000Education$1,078,184Human Services$920,000Philanthropy$727,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $705,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $532,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetEnergy Peace Partners: $435,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetPower for All: $400,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $365,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEACOLOGY: $357,500 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $322,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGE LABS: $320,000 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $310,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE: $280,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $270,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMI'NANGWTUKWSIWMANI: $255,000 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetECOAMERICA: $255,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetURBAN FOREST CARBON REGISTRY: $245,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $243,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC: $235,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetThe Land Institute: $230,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $213,684 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGroundswell International Inc: $169,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCalifornia Black Womens Health Project: $162,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTO NIZHONI ANI: $160,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS: $158,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $151,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLA COCINA: $150,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBEYOND BORDERS INC: $147,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $145,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KILGORIS PROJECT: $142,500 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetGLOBAL FISHING WATCH INC: $142,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPROSPERITY CATALYST INC: $136,500 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetVOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT: $136,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK: $135,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $132,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO PLATEAU FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA NURSE-MIDWIVES FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetSHINE ON FKA SHINE ON SIERRA LEONE: $107,500 over 4y, 22% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $102,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCalMatters: $101,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNew Creation Home Ministries: $100,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetCLIMATE AND HEALTH RESEARCH NETWORK: $100,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetDIVERSITY UPLIFTS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetNARRATIVE NATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRICHMOND PROMISE INC: $95,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $85,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Ed Academy: $85,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetGrist Magazine Inc: $85,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds Energy Peace Partners ↗
  • Who funds Power for All ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SEACOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds CHANGE LABS ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMI'NANGWTUKWSIWMANI ↗
  • Who funds ECOAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds URBAN FOREST CARBON REGISTRY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Land Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOLANI LAKE ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds Groundswell International Inc ↗
  • Who funds California Black Womens Health Project ↗
  • Who funds TO NIZHONI ANI ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
  • Who funds EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LA COCINA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William & Flora H…The San Francisco Fou…The David and Lucile …Tides FoundationJewish Community Fede…Silicon Valley Commun…Rockefeller Philanthr…The Schmidt Family Fo…Amalgamated Charitabl…ImpactassetsincThe California Wellne…Marin Community Found…
The William & Flora Hewlett FoundationCA34.9× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Tides Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · The California Wellness Foundation · Marin Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Flora Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Flora Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Sustainable Northwest: 5% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Bruce Museum Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Bridges Middle School: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Flora Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Flora Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 455 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Flora Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home