Skip to content
Fleischaker Women's Legacy Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

Fleischaker Women's Legacy Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$117kCommunity Improvement$40kScience & Tech$28kAnimals$12kArts & Culture$10kCivil Rights$5kPhilanthropy$3kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOVETAIL LEARNING$15,000
EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$2,100
SW WOMEN'S LAW CENTER$1,000
COMMUNITIES OF SCHOOLS OF NM$500
Individual grant recipient$500
PAYPAL GIVING FUND$364
PAYPAL GIVING FUND$275
ESPANOLA HUMANE$256
FORWARDCOM$184
JNFORG$150
CHRONICLES OF PHILANTHROPY$110
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOVETAIL LEARNING: $25k → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT (WWP): $100 → 14%RURAL UTAH PROJECT EDUCATION FUND: $1k → 8%4PAWSFORABILITY: $100 → 9%DOVETAIL LEARNING: $20k → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%DOVETAIL LEARNING: $15k → 9%DOVETAIL LEARNING: $30k → 9%DOVETAIL LEARNING: $15k → 9%DOVETAIL LEARNING: $10k → 9%THINK NEW MEXICO: $250 → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $500 → 12%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
SC
DC
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 44% of Fleischaker Women's Legacy Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Fleischaker Women's Legacy Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$225k · 19 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
53

Total granted

$225k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+21%

Still filing today

84%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $33k · revenue +111%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +31%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $3k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • GD
    GCCE DBA CREATIVE STARTUPS
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • SU
    STEWARDSHIP UTAH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
2
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
3
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
4
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
5
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

—
6
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
7
Animal Equality

Animal equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.

Animals
8
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
9
Pasado's Safe Haven

Fighting to end animal cruelty and create a more compassionate world.(continued in schedule o)fiscal year 2024-2025 highlights include:investigated/resourced 71 animal cruelty cases, provided care andrehabilitations for 398 animals at our…

Animals
10
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
11
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
12
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Good Charities; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/54
Grantees still filing
32/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dovetail Learning Inc: $115,000 · Human ServicesDovetail Learning Inc+4 more: $2,100 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGCCE DBA CREATIVE STARTUPS: $20,000 · OtherGCCE DBA CREATIVE STARTUPSIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · Other+41 more: $15,402 · Other+41 moreEXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $32,500 · Arts & CultureEXPLORA SCIENCE…PRO PUBLICA INC: $1,360 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $1,866 · Arts & CultureHumane World for Animals Inc: $4,050 · AnimalsRESCUE DOGS ROCK INC: $1,866 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $1,115 · AnimalsSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $750 · AnimalsACTION PROGRAM FOR ANIMALS: $528 · AnimalsOLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC: $500 · AnimalsNetwork for Animals USA Inc: $500 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $450 · Animals+9 more: $1,194 · AnimalsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,100 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $600 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $500 · InternationalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,500 · Crime & LegalCONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE: $500 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $100 · Crime & LegalSANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $523 · EducationTHE NEW AMSTERDAM SCHOOL: $500 · Education
Human Services$117,100Other$93,902Arts & Culture$35,726Animals$10,953International$3,200Crime & Legal$3,100Education$2,023

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDovetail Learning Inc: $115,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetEXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $32,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $4,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE DOGS ROCK INC: $1,866 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $1,360 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $1,115 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEWARDSHIP UTAH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $975 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $956 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $639 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $543 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION PROGRAM FOR ANIMALS: $528 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $523 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW AMSTERDAM SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOLD FRIENDS SENIOR DOGS INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNetwork for Animals USA Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXODUS ENSEMBLE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICANS TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HORSE SHELTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHWORKS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetODD MAN INN ANIMAL REFUGE: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRONICLE OF PHILANTHROPY: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAGGLE FOUNDATION INC: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR PAWS INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $85 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Marshall L and Perrin…Albuquerque Community…The Duffield Family F…Van Essen Family Foun…The Allene & Jerome L…Garfield Street Found…The Abeles FoundationAnchorum St VincentBrindle FoundationLannan FoundationLos Alamos National L…
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM25.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Van Essen Family Foundation · The Allene & Jerome Lapides Foundation · Garfield Street Foundation · The Abeles Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Brindle Foundation · Lannan Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fleischaker Women's Legacy Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fleischaker Women's Legacy Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fleischaker Women's Legacy Fund?

Find your warmest path to Fleischaker Women's Legacy Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fleischaker Women's Legacy’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home