Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fleck Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$167kHealth$148kReligion$64kHousing & Shelter$33kEmployment$33kCommunity Improvement$30kYouth Development$29kEducation$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
$4,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$831k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$12,000
CHILDRENS CIRCLE OF CARE$10,000
FOCUS$10,000
KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SVS$9,000
THE 100 CLUB$5,000
TEEN LIFELINE$5,000
AID TO WOMEN CTR$5,000
THE HERE AND NOW$5,000
PHOENIX CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$5,000
MINDS MATTER$4,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$4,000
NEW BEGINNINGS$4,000
LIFE CHURCH$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$4,000
DOOR OF HOPE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DAVIDS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%TABLE MINISTRIES: $2k → 13%MILLIONAIR CLUB: $10k → 9%DAVIDS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%MILLIONAIR CLUB: $10k → 9%THE HERE AND NOW PROJECT: $5k → 9%DAVIDS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%MILLIONAIR CLUB: $10k → 9%DAVIDS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%DAVIDS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $550 → 16%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $1k → 9%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $1k → 9%UPLIFT NOTHWEST: $800 → 9%BELLEVUE LIFE SPRING: $2k → 9%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $3k → 9%NEXUS YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $10k → 9%TOYS FOR KIDS: $500 → 9%KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 9%KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $4k → 9%KENT FOOD BANK: $2k → 9%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $3k → 9%TOYS FOR KIDS: $2k → 9%TOYS FOR KIDS: $550 → 9%EASTSIDE BABY CORNER: $550 → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
CA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$444k · 33 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
46

Total granted

$444k
$194k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
0%

Still filing today

64%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KY
    KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $39k · revenue +15%
  • UN
    UPLIFT NORTHWEST
    6× · 2017–2023 · $33k · revenue +41%
  • WC
    WEA CHILDRENS FUND
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHILDRENS CIRCLE CARE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • NA
    NEXUS - AUBURN YOUTH RESOURCES
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Network Services

Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…

Human Services
2
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
3
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
4
Family Law Casa of King County

Family law casa is committed to positive long-term outcomes for children, families, and communities navigating economic injustice across king county. we advance intersectional equity by providing free advocacy services for children…

Human Services
5
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
6
Transitions

Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.

Human Services
7
Building Changes

Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…

Health
8
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
9
The Sophia Way

The sophia way is a place of hope and change for women. we support them on their journey from homelessness to safe and stable living.

Human Services
10
Southwest Youth and Family Services

SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.

Human Services
11
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
12
Homeaid Puget Sound

Homeaid's mission is to help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Children's Guild Association; the most unlike its peers is Casa Dog. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON ELKS THERAPY PROGRAM: $45,000 · OtherWASHINGTON ELKS THERAPY PROGRAMFOCUS MAKING A DIFFERENCE: $30,000 · OtherFOCUS MAKING A DIFFERENCEFOCUS: $30,000 · OtherFOCUSAID TO WOMEN CENTER APACHE CENTER: $20,000 · OtherCHILDRENS CIRCLE OF CARE: $20,000 · OtherOxford House Inc: $17,200 · Other+61 more: $287,050 · Other+61 moreKENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $39,000 · Human ServicesKENT YOUTH AND FAMIL…UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $32,800 · Human ServicesUPLIFT NORTHWESTTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRI…NEXUS YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $10,000 · Human ServicesNEXUS YOUTH AND FAMI…DAVIDS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $6,150 · Human ServicesHere and Now Project: $5,000 · Human Services+6 more: $15,350 · Human Services+6 moreWEA CHILDRENS FUND: $30,000 · ReligionLIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC: $15,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital: $14,000 · HealthTeen Lifeline Inc: $14,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSOLDIERS' ANGELS: $4,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $17,500 · EducationMINDS MATTER OF SEATTLE INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTREEHOUSE: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$449,250Human Services$118,300Religion$30,000Health$29,000Public Safety & Disaster$18,000Education$17,500Youth Development$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $39,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUPLIFT NORTHWEST: $32,800 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWEA CHILDRENS FUND: $30,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOxford House Inc: $17,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S GUILD ASSOCIATION: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTeen Lifeline Inc: $14,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXUS YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAID TO WOMEN CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDAVIDS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $6,150 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON: $6,150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF FISHER HOUSE PUGET SOUND: $5,200 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF SEATTLE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budget100 CLUB OF ARIZONA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Children United Society: $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetHere and Now Project: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSOLDIERS' ANGELS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOVERLAKE SERVICE LEAGUE: $3,150 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIDVANTAGE: $3,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMMAMISH ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTOYS FOR KIDS: $2,650 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKENT FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY SERVICES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORCH CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUPPY HAVEN RESCUE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTABLE MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPURRFECT PALS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCasa Dog: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds WEA CHILDRENS FUND ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Oxford House Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S GUILD ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Teen Lifeline Inc ↗
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
  • Who funds NEXUS YOUTH AND FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds AID TO WOMEN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DAVIDS LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FISHER HOUSE PUGET SOUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA26.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · One Eighty Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Pinnacle Printing Foundation dba Walkley Foundation · 47th Avenue Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fleck Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fleck Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Oxford House Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fleck Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fleck Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fleck Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph