· Private foundation
47th Avenue Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k39 grants · $870k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $498k
- $250k+2 grants · $555k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE MUSEUM OF FLIGHT | $300,000 |
| KINDERING | $255,000 |
| WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY | $230,031 |
| CLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE | $100,000 |
| RECOVERY CAFE | $65,000 |
| ST MONICA CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $53,095 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PUGET SOUND | $50,000 |
| WOODLAND PARK ZOO | $47,000 |
| COUNTRY VILLAGE DAY SCHOOL | $42,150 |
| ALLIANCE FOR EDUCATION | $40,000 |
| BOYER CHILDREN'S CLINIC | $35,000 |
| PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT | $33,333 |
| THE SERVICE BOARD | $33,125 |
| BELONG PARTNERS | $30,000 |
| FAMILIES OF COLOR SEATTLE | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $341k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $706k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MOMUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +307%
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY3× · 2022–2024 · $690k · revenue +18%- KCKINDERING CENTER3× · 2022–2024 · $292k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- BPBELLEVUE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $1.1M
- FFFAMILY FIRST COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -55%
- KKIDVANTAGEone grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue -8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To nurture and sustain child-centered, antiracist early learning communities.Our work is to:1) Help families access high quality childcare and after-school care.2) Increase the availability of high-quality care through coaching and…
Hilltop is transforming early childhood education through play, collaboration, and reflection: in our classrooms with children, partnerships with families, and professional development with educators.
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
Spruce Street School is a nurturing educational community that instills in a broad range of children the social, emotional, and intellectual skills for lifelong participation in a diverse society. We offer kindergarten through fifth grade…
SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.
Washington Family Engagement fosters social transformation by supporting the development of mulitgenerational leaders from diverse backgrounds to become actively engaged in schools and communities in Washington State.
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.
At Seattle Amistad School, we foster community integrity through rigorous bilingual and bicultural education, developing our students' academic strengths and cultural sensibilities, while nurturing compassionate and engaged citizens.
Pathwaves Washington builds the collective power of leaders of color to transform early childhood systems so that every child and their community thrives.
Seattle School for Boys encourages and inspires boys to become collaborative learners, creative thinkers, and compassionate leaders who genuinely care about our diverse global community.
Founded in 1994, PSCS is a small, independent middle and high school located in the Chinatown/International District of downtown Seattle. PSCS is committed to co-creating a brave space for community-centered education, critical curriculum,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Home Society of Washington and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY CAFE ↗
- Who funds Boyer Children's Clinic ↗
- Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds FAMILY FIRST COMMUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds HAMLIN ROBINSON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COUNTRY VILLAGE DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PROGRAM FOR EARLY PARENT SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds RAINIER ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds KIDVANTAGE ↗
- Who funds SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPECENTRAL ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Education ↗
- Who funds Sports in Schools ↗
- Who funds The Service Board ↗
- Who funds BELONG Partners ↗
- Who funds Families of Color Seattle ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE BABY ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ROUTE 21 ↗
- Who funds LifeWire ↗
- Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
- Who funds RUBY ROOM ↗
- Who funds ENCOMPASS NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds SAMMAMISH ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds BUILDING CHANGES ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Zeno ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOT PROJECTS ↗
- Who funds BELLEVUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Medina Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Windermere Foundation · Raikes Foundation · NW Childrens Foundation · Gates Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 47th Avenue Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to 47th Avenue Foundation?
Find your warmest path to 47th Avenue Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.