Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pinnacle Printing Foundation dba Walkley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Human Services$69kHealth$28kAnimals$22kFood & Nutrition$22kYouth Development$14kEmployment$8kRecreation & Sports$8kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$616k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hope for Heroes$9,000
JBLM Army Fisher House$4,000
Pediatric Interim Center$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Kidvantage was Eastside Baby Corner$2,444
Fairwood Lions Club$2,000
Brigadoon Service Dogs$2,000
Kent Youth Family Services KYFS$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Uplift$1,000
Renton Senior Activity Center$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Challenger Elementary School$166
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Uplift: $1k → 9%Sophias Way: $250 → 9%Friendship Adventures: $650 → 9%Kent Youth and Family Services: $2k → 9%Kent Youth and Famlly Services: $650 → 9%Kent Youth and Family Services: $500 → 9%Kent Youth and Family Services: $500 → 9%Kidvantage was Eastside Baby Corner: $2k → 9%Eastside Baby Corner: $2k → 9%Issaquah Food Bank: $2k → 9%Eastside Baby Corner: $2k → 9%Issaquah Food Bank: $1k → 9%Eastside BabyCorner: $331 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$136k · 27 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
59

Total granted

$136k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+22%

Still filing today

26%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsEmploymentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS
    5× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +57%
  • K
    KIDVANTAGE
    4× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +45%
  • KY
    KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
    4× · 2019–2023 · $4k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • UF
    UW Foundation Hematology
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • O
    OAFS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
2
Food Lifeline

Food lifeline's mission is to feed people experiencing hunger today while working to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
4
Renewal Food Bank

Renewal Food Bank provides food to needy and economically vulnerable individuals who live in Bellevue, Washington and surrounding communities

Human Services
5
Invest in Washington Now Campaign

Advocate for tax policy in Washington State

6
Skagit Gleaners

Food recovery for low income families over 600 families served

7
Friends of Seattle Waterfront

To bring people, communities, and resources together to ensure waterfront park thrives as a vibrant gathering space - uplifting locals, fostering connections and honoring seattle's natural beauty and stories.

Community Improvement
8
Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners

Increasing the human potential of our community by providing opportunities for people in need.

Human Services
9
Spokane Humane Society

The vision of Spokane Humane Society is to enrich the lives of animals and their companions through Support, Education, Advocacy and Love (SEAL). As the oldest local non-profit in Spokane, we have been serving companion animals in need and…

Animals
10
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

11
Hopelink

Hopelink equips people to exit poverty through comprehensive services, impactful partnerships, and advocacy for equitable opportunities for all.

Human Services
12
Lifelong Health for All

Lifelong health for all removes barriers to health with relentless compassion so that no one faces illness and injustice alone.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Harvest Emm and the most unlike its peers is Austen Everett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Hope for Heroes — $25,000 · OtherHope for HeroesCampbell Family — $11,300 · OtherCampbell FamilyPediatric Interim Center — $11,250 · OtherPediatric Interim CenterUW Foundation Hematology — $10,000 · OtherUW Foundation HematologyJBLM Army Fisher House — $9,000 · OtherJBLM Army Fisher HouseIndividual grant recipient — $8,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $6,393 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,750 · Other+70 more — $66,855 · Other+70 moreKIDVANTAGE — $6,436 · Human ServicesKIDVANTAG…KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES — $3,650 · Human ServicesKENT YOUT…ISSAQUAH FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK — $3,065 · Human ServicesISSAQUAH …UPLIFT NORTHWEST — $1,000 · Human ServicesUPLIFT NO…FRIENDSHIP ADVENTURES — $650 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesBRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS — $6,600 · AnimalsSAMMAMISH ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $338 · AnimalsFARESTART — $6,650 · EmploymentBELLEVUE KIWANIS FOUNDATION — $2,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF AMERICAN LAKE VETERANS GOLF COURSE — $1,100 · Recreation & SportsAUSTEN EVERETT FOUNDATION — $250 · Recreation & SportsKABOOM INC — $200 · Recreation & SportsRENTON REGIONAL COMMUNITY FNDN — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$153,798Human Services$15,051Animals$6,938Employment$6,650Education$2,000Recreation & Sports$1,550Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFARESTART — $6,650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS — $6,600 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetKIDVANTAGE — $6,436 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES — $3,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISSAQUAH FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK — $3,065 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE KIWANIS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetFRIENDS OF AMERICAN LAKE VETERANS GOLF COURSE — $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPLIFT NORTHWEST — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRENTON REGIONAL COMMUNITY FNDN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP ADVENTURES — $650 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAMMAMISH ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $338 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SOPHIA WAY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKABOOM INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FARESTART
  • Who funds BRIGADOON SERVICE DOGS
  • Who funds KIDVANTAGE
  • Who funds KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds ISSAQUAH FOOD AND CLOTHING BANK
  • Who funds BELLEVUE KIWANIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AMERICAN LAKE VETERANS GOLF COURSE
  • Who funds UPLIFT NORTHWEST
  • Who funds RENTON REGIONAL COMMUNITY FNDN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA20.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · United Way of King County · Fleck Family Foundation · Glassybaby White Light Fund · Lucky Seven Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pinnacle Printing Foundation dba Walkley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph