· Private foundation
Fleck Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $70k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS | $12,000 |
| CHILDRENS CIRCLE OF CARE | $10,000 |
| FOCUS | $10,000 |
| KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SVS | $9,000 |
| AID TO WOMEN CTR | $5,000 |
| THE HERE AND NOW | $5,000 |
| THE 100 CLUB | $5,000 |
| PHOENIX CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $5,000 |
| TEEN LIFELINE | $5,000 |
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION | $4,000 |
| NEW BEGINNINGS | $4,000 |
| LIFE CHURCH | $4,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $4,000 |
| MINDS MATTER | $4,000 |
| DOOR OF HOPE | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KYKENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES4× · 2021–2024 · $39k · revenue +15%
- UNUPLIFT NORTHWEST6× · 2017–2023 · $33k · revenue +41%
- WCWEA CHILDRENS FUND3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- LCLIFE CHOICES WOMENS CLINICone grant, 2021 · $10k
- NNEXUSone grant, 2017 · $10k
- NANEXUS - AUBURN YOUTH RESOURCESone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
Family law casa is committed to positive long-term outcomes for children, families, and communities navigating economic injustice across king county. we advance intersectional equity by providing free advocacy services for children…
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.
The sophia way is a place of hope and change for women. we support them on their journey from homelessness to safe and stable living.
SWYFS partners with youth and families to transform their futures.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
Homeaid's mission is to help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Children's Guild Association and the most unlike its peers is Casa Dog. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KENT YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds WEA CHILDRENS FUND ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Oxford House Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S GUILD ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds Teen Lifeline Inc ↗
- Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds AID TO WOMEN CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEXUS YOUTH AND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds DAVIDS LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF FISHER HOUSE PUGET SOUND ↗
- Who funds 100 CLUB OF ARIZONA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · One Eighty Foundation · Employees Community Fund of Boeing-Puget Sound · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Pinnacle Printing Foundation dba Walkley Foundation · 47th Avenue Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fleck Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oxford House Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Fleck Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Fleck Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.