Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fite Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.9MPhilanthropy$785kHealth$390kArts & Culture$134kInternational$133kCivil Rights$120kPublic Benefit$100kReligion$53kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $546k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FITE FAMILY FUND$300,000
THE FITE FAMILY FUND$201,350
GIRLS ATHLETIC LEADERSHIP SCHOOL$100,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$85,000
UT FOUNDATION$60,000
OBAMA FOUNDATION$50,000
CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$50,000
ITHACA COLLEGE$30,000
ALSAC ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$25,000
KCRW$20,000
KEHILLAT ISRAEL$20,000
JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
MENDEZ NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TRANSP LANTATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $5k → 16%MOTHERS OUTREACH NETWORK: $5k → 14%AMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOUCE: $6k → 10%AMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOUCE: $6k → 10%INNOCENT PROJECT: $3k → 17%AMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOUCE: $4k → 10%AL OTRO LADO: $10k → 14%AL OTRO LADO: $5k → 14%AL OTRO LADO: $5k → 14%GRIEFHAVEN: $10k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $5k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
CA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 29 repeat orgs$846k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
28

Total granted

$2.9M
$217k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+23%

Still filing today

48%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $629k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    The George Washington University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $330k · revenue +30%
  • TA
    THE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $260k · revenue +12%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $170k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • PS
    PLURALISTIC SCHOOL ONE
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +64%
  • Feeding America
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
7
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
8
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
9
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
12
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People for the American Way; the most unlike its peers is Pine Ridge Girls School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
31/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIRLS ATHLETIC LEADERSHIP SCHOOLS: $850,000 · EducationGIRLS ATHLETIC LEADERSHIP SCHOOLSThe George Washington University: $330,000 · EducationThe George Washington UniversityTHE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $260,000 · EducationTHE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INCDUKE UNIVERSITY: $170,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA+5 more: $74,500 · EducationTHE FITE FAMILY FUND: $501,350 · OtherTHE FITE FAMILY FUNDUT FOUNDATION: $240,000 · OtherUT FOUNDATIONCHMC FOUNDATION: $160,000 · OtherCHMC FOUNDATIONALSAC ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherKCRW: $65,000 · Other+31 more: $612,150 · Other+31 moreCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $40,000 · HealthMercy Corps: $50,000 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $30,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Arts & CultureSNO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Arts & CultureAL OTRO LADO: $20,250 · Human ServicesAMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOURCE CENTER: $16,000 · Human ServicesThe Erika Whitmore Godwin Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesMOTHERS OUTREACH NETWORK: $5,000 · Human ServicesYolo Crisis Nursery: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesHOPEWELL FUND: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BRIANNA KUPFER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUND: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTRAVIS CREDIT UNION'S COMMUNITY FINANCIAL WELLNESS FUND: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Education$1,784,500Other$1,738,500Health$90,000International$90,000Arts & Culture$84,000Human Services$66,250Philanthropy$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIRLS ATHLETIC LEADERSHIP SCHOOLS: $850,000 over 4y, 60% of budgetThe George Washington University: $330,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $260,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $170,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMercy Corps: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAL OTRO LADO: $20,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOURCE CENTER: $16,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFeeding America: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Erika Whitmore Godwin Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIANNA KUPFER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESTAURANT WORKERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOTHERS OUTREACH NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYolo Crisis Nursery: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPINE RIDGE GIRLS SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNative American Land Conservancy: $4,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANGEL CITY PIT BULLS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVIS CREDIT UNION'S COMMUNITY FINANCIAL WELLNESS FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Conscious Kid: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIRLS ATHLETIC LEADERSHIP SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds THE ARCHER SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds AL OTRO LADO ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin and Lauren Fite Foundation Co de Registered Agents & IncorporatorsDE17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin and Lauren Fite Foundation Co de Registered Agents & Incorporators · California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fite Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fite Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Fite Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Fite Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fite Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph