Skip to content
First Mid Bancshares Inc First Mid Wealth Management at a glance

· Private foundation

First Mid Bancshares Inc First Mid Wealth Management

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$332k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.1MEducation$552kHealth$155kHousing & Shelter$125kHuman Services$52kArts & Culture$40kPhilanthropy$38kReligion$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$593k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MATTOON SPORTS COMPLEX INC$250,000
SARAH BUSH LINCOLN HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
STATELINE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$20,000
CHARLESTON FOOD PANTRY$10,000
ILLINOIS AMISH HERITAGE CENTER$10,000
ST JOHNS CHURCH & SCHOOL$8,333
MATTOON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$1,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
COMMUNITY INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY$1,000
GOOD SAMARITAN FOOD PANTRY$1,000
ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,000
NEOGA COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$1,000
GLEN ED PANTRY$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES CARING & SHARING$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $141k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GLEN ED PANTRY: $1k → 12%METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS EQUAL HOUSING AND OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $110k → 21%METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS EQUAL HOUSING AND OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $15k → 21%BUILD MO HEALTH: $15k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 11 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$1.9M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
0%

Still filing today

45%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    Eastern Illinois University Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +53%
  • SB
    SARAH BUSH LINCOLN HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +52%
  • WI
    Woodstock Institute
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • TY
    THE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • MS
    MAC SPORTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -30%
  • ST
    SUMPTER TOWNSHIP PARK FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

—
2
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
3
Forward Through Ferguson

Embracing the ferguson commission's mandate, forward through ferguson centers impacted communities and mobilizes accountable bodies to advance racially equitable systems and policies that ensure all people in the st. louis region can…

Civil Rights
4
Economic Development Corp of Decatur-Macon County

To coordinate non-retail business attraction, retention, and expansion efforts in macon county, illinois.

—
5
St Louis Community Foundation Inc

To improve the quality of life in the greater st louis metropolitan area by connecting individuals, families, and businesses to their philanthropic goals.

Philanthropy
6
The Edgar County Community Foundation

To make annual distributions for charitable purposes in edgar county, il.

Philanthropy
7
Eastern Illinois Foodbank

Eastern illinois foodbank exists to alleviate hunger in eastern illinois by providing a reliable source of food for the hungry through cooperation with a network of food pantries and agencies.

Food & Nutrition
8
Edhub Stl

The Education Equity Center of St. Louis advances a regional approach to achieving full racial equity in education by building anti-racist capacity towards systems level practices and policy changes.

Education
9
Small Business Empowerment Fund Cdfi

A community development financial institution or community development finance institution - abbreviated in both cases to CDFI - is a financial institution that provides credit and financial services to underserved markets and populations,…

Community Improvement
10
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
11
Southern Illinois Community Foundation

To foster and encourage private philanthropic giving to improve communities of the Southern Illinois Region by connecting charitable donors with worthy causes and to build endowment funds that will support those worthy causes in perpetuity.

Philanthropy
12
St Louis Sports Commission Inc

Foster economic growth and improved quality of life in the st. louis area by producing events, enhancing its national and international image as a premier sports region, and increasing community awareness of the value of sports.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Build Missouri Health; the most unlike its peers is Eagle Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
6/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MATTOON SPORTS COMPLEX INC: $1,000,000 · Community ImprovementMATTOON SPORTS COMPLEX INC+1 more: $15,000 · Community ImprovementEastern Illinois University Foundation: $500,000 · EducationEastern Illinois Universit…SARAH BUSH LINCOLN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $140,000 · OtherSARAH BUSH LINCOLN H…THE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $50,000 · OtherTHE YOUTH AND FAMILY…SOUTHEASTERN IL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37,555 · OtherSOUTHEASTERN IL COMM…Individual grant recipient: $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…STATELINE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS: $20,000 · OtherST JOHNS CHURCH & SCHOOL: $16,666 · OtherSUMPTER TOWNSHIP PARK FUND: $15,000 · OtherARCOLA FOUNDATION PALACE FUND: $15,000 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $15,000 · OtherILLINOIS AMISH HERITAGE CENTER: $15,000 · Other+12 more: $44,500 · Other+12 moreMetropolitan St Louis Equal Housing & Opportunity Council: $125,000 · Human ServicesBUILD MISSOURI HEALTH: $15,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesEDWARDSVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMAC SPORTS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyEAGLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LITTLE THEATRE - ON THE SQUARE INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureDIASPORA CONNECTIONS UNLIMITED: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND: $10,000 · Youth Development
Community Improvement$1,015,000Education$500,000Other$395,721Human Services$141,000Philanthropy$60,000Arts & Culture$25,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMATTOON SPORTS COMPLEX INC: $1,000,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetEastern Illinois University Foundation: $500,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetSARAH BUSH LINCOLN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetMetropolitan St Louis Equal Housing & Opportunity Council: $125,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetTHE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetEDWARDSVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMAC SPORTS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAIL RECREATION EFFINGHAM COUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetBUILD MISSOURI HEALTH: $15,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTHE LITTLE THEATRE - ON THE SQUARE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWoodstock Institute: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDIASPORA CONNECTIONS UNLIMITED: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetEAGLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATTOON COMMUNITY FOOD CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lumpkin Family Fo…Southeastern Illinois…St Louis Community Fo…The US Charitable Gif…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Lumpkin Family FoundationIL17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lumpkin Family Foundation · Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization First Mid Bancshares Inc First Mid Wealth Management funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from First Mid Bancshares Inc First Mid Wealth Management. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on First Mid Bancshares Inc First Mid Wealth Management’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home